paging OLDHLSDude
| house-broken incel | 09/21/21 | | Bat shit crazy selfie water buffalo | 09/26/21 | | Misunderstood goal in life | 09/26/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/26/21 | | Bat shit crazy selfie water buffalo | 09/26/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/26/21 | | Bat shit crazy selfie water buffalo | 09/26/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/26/21 | | angry organic girlfriend | 09/27/21 | | Bat shit crazy selfie water buffalo | 09/26/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/29/21 | | confused big theatre | 09/27/21 | | Misunderstood goal in life | 09/26/21 | | Chestnut menage milk | 09/28/21 | | red unholy crackhouse useless brakes | 09/28/21 | | insecure school cafeteria | 09/29/21 | | Nudist cyan corn cake cumskin | 10/20/21 | | magical ladyboy library | 09/21/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/26/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | racy pink prole international law enforcement agency | 09/26/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | racy pink prole international law enforcement agency | 09/26/21 | | jet azn school | 09/26/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | Harsh step-uncle's house dopamine | 09/26/21 | | insecure school cafeteria | 09/29/21 | | Misunderstood goal in life | 09/26/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | Elite sick stag film new version | 09/27/21 | | low-t kitchen dog poop | 09/26/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | low-t kitchen dog poop | 09/26/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/26/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/26/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | confused big theatre | 09/27/21 | | Gaped trip theater stage | 09/27/21 | | Harsh step-uncle's house dopamine | 09/28/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/30/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | sable halford | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | sickened salmon rigor | 09/27/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/26/21 | | Cracking location background story | 09/26/21 | | low-t kitchen dog poop | 09/26/21 | | Harsh step-uncle's house dopamine | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | sickened salmon rigor | 09/27/21 | | Harsh step-uncle's house dopamine | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 10/01/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/01/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Harsh step-uncle's house dopamine | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | low-t kitchen dog poop | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | confused big theatre | 09/27/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/27/21 | | confused big theatre | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Gaped trip theater stage | 09/27/21 | | Frozen Indian Lodge | 09/27/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/27/21 | | Exhilarant seedy sound barrier antidepressant drug | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | pale office national security agency | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | low-t kitchen dog poop | 09/27/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | Flushed death wish | 09/27/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/27/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | buff shaky ticket booth | 09/28/21 | | violet son of senegal house | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | violet son of senegal house | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | Flushed death wish | 09/28/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/28/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | buff shaky ticket booth | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Harsh step-uncle's house dopamine | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | buff shaky ticket booth | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | buff shaky ticket booth | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | buff shaky ticket booth | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Flatulent church cuckoldry | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Chestnut menage milk | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Chestnut menage milk | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | buff shaky ticket booth | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | marvelous business firm | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | opaque hairraiser abode | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/30/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Bat shit crazy selfie water buffalo | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Flatulent church cuckoldry | 09/28/21 | | Comical hideous parlour faggotry | 09/28/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 09/28/21 | | Hateful Senate Newt | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | opaque hairraiser abode | 09/28/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Comical hideous parlour faggotry | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Comical hideous parlour faggotry | 09/28/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/28/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | confused big theatre | 09/29/21 | | Free-loading space tattoo | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/28/21 | | Self-centered Pontificating Casino | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/29/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | low-t kitchen dog poop | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/28/21 | | buff shaky ticket booth | 09/28/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/28/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 09/28/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 09/28/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/29/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/29/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/29/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/29/21 | | pale office national security agency | 09/30/21 | | Harsh step-uncle's house dopamine | 10/01/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/29/21 | | canary set | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | jet azn school | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Cheese-eating violent national | 09/29/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/29/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/30/21 | | Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king | 09/29/21 | | Copper impressive hissy fit | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | soggy mildly autistic area potus | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | soggy mildly autistic area potus | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | soggy mildly autistic area potus | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | soggy mildly autistic area potus | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | soggy mildly autistic area potus | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | opaque hairraiser abode | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | soggy mildly autistic area potus | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | opaque hairraiser abode | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/05/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | wine narrow-minded bawdyhouse messiness | 09/30/21 | | judgmental glassy hospital | 09/30/21 | | wine narrow-minded bawdyhouse messiness | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | soggy mildly autistic area potus | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/02/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | jet azn school | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | mauve laughsome locus weed whacker | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 10/01/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/01/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 10/07/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/08/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 10/08/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/08/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/01/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 10/01/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 10/01/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/01/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 10/03/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/03/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/01/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/01/21 | | bull headed forum wagecucks | 10/01/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/02/21 | | jet azn school | 09/30/21 | | house-broken incel | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 09/30/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/05/21 | | buck-toothed crimson quadroon range | 10/01/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/01/21 | | Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler | 10/03/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/06/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/06/21 | | Umber Travel Guidebook | 10/13/21 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: September 26th, 2021 10:23 PM Author: Floppy Charcoal Center Philosopher-king
https://today.law.harvard.edu/polyamory-and-the-law/
no, not unbearably woke at all, just the lgbtq+ clinic promoting polyamory.
totally normal stuff.
and he fits right in and isn’t threatening at all to libs: fed soc, aipac, wachtell, hedge funds, totally what they think a colored person of color should be doing
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43183104) |
Date: September 26th, 2021 10:55 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Hi folks,
Without confirming or denying that I am the student in question, I will say that I am willing to confirm/explain certain things off-line (or, perhaps better put, off this forum) to OldHLSDude. I was directed to these posts about HLS and about me by another user (a current student). If there's a good way to be in touch with you, OldHLSDude, please let me know. I wouldn't usually post on a site like this, but given that I'm already being discussed here, I may as well confirm certain things to a user that other users appear to trust (like OldHLSDude) rather than have my reputation harmed by accusations and doubts that go unaddressed.
The story is significantly worse than what's been discussed. It is really, really bad. It's very political, both internally and in the traditional sense of the word, and it's just incredibly inappropriate. It's also sad -- makes it hard to see the school in the same way. (And no, I didn't start it.)
I'll tell OldHLSDude (and show him), at which point he'll probably be in a position to confirm that I was really wronged here and that HLS has a lot to answer for.
Thanks,
BB
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43183274) |
|
Date: September 26th, 2021 11:13 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
One would need money for any lengthy protracted engagement with HLS or for any serious negotiation.
Separately, some lawyers have indicated that if it weren't the law school, they would be willing to help, but because it's the law school, they don't want to get involved. Some see it as a bad look, for lack of a better term, to assist a student who claims that HLS administrators engaged in misconduct -- not because they don't believe me, but, I think, because they do. Especially so for lawyers admitted to practice in MA, where there is such strong HLS influence that affects one's social standing and professional network.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43183340) |
|
Date: September 26th, 2021 11:21 PM Author: judgmental glassy hospital
hey bro.
i would up in a situation very similar to yours that put my career and life in limbo and took years to resolve, caused by a handful of people in power with an axe to grind + institutional malaise. it was a kafkaesqe nightmare and i still have ptsd about it.
reading your twitter posts really brought me back to that and i really feel for you. wish you the best. the uncertainty and waiting is maddening, i'm sure. the class you started 3 years ago is now graduating and going off to work while you have to sit around with a thumb in your ass. fucking despicable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43183361) |
|
Date: September 26th, 2021 11:35 PM Author: judgmental glassy hospital
for anonymity sake i can't provide further details, but i was in pretty much the exact same situation. add to that the embarrassment and reputation hit of everyone assuming "well, you must have done something wrong" (hey, maybe you did. i wasn't completely innocent but the consequences *vastly* outweighed anything i did). every job interview, networking connection, friend, relative, etc. you've gotta go through the whole story about what's going on and what happened. and on top of that, when you're left in complete limbo, you're constantly being asked by concerned people in your life what's going on, but only able to respond "idk, still waiting". i still have nightmares about it, literally.
if you ever want to vent to someone who has been through similar circumstances, my throwaway email is gunneratttt@gmail.com
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43183415) |
|
Date: September 27th, 2021 12:31 AM Author: judgmental glassy hospital
well if the facts are as you say, everything should come out fine in the end. my situation was caused by my own actions. maybe you'll wind up being the poster child unfair treatment of right leaning people in academia. that could present a lot of opportunities.
anyway, the limbo and uncertainty spanning years is truly horrible. at the time i wished i could have just been sentenced. it would be comforting to know there was a deadline when everything would be over. not knowing and not being about to plan is maddening. especially when they delay is likely caused by typical bureaucratic bullshit.
best of luck, brother.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43183574) |
|
Date: September 27th, 2021 9:30 PM Author: Cheese-eating violent national
it seems very unreasonable that you would continue posting in this thread given what you’ve revealed already.
i can predict the future. three things are going to happen soon:
1. you will realize you’ve made an enormous mistake by poasting about this here
2. you will blank all of your poasts
3. you will run away
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43188248) |
|
Date: September 27th, 2021 9:26 PM Author: low-t kitchen dog poop
When are you going to graduate?
post graduation plans? Do you want biglaw?
Your profile says your interests are M&A? That sounds incredibly boring, no offense.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43188231) |
Date: September 27th, 2021 10:38 PM Author: Free-loading space tattoo
BB seems like a good dooder and it sucks he's going through this.
Please explain the jewish symbol on the twitter account. I want to follow you to keep up with this, but I'm afraid.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43188643) |
|
Date: September 27th, 2021 11:47 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
HERE WE GO...
Like I said, I didn't start this mess. What they did was bad, and embarrassing, and never should have happened.
https://imgur.com/a/h0aNxlo
They don't deny any of it. They refuse to confirm or deny in writing, whether this happened -- because it did happen, and because several staff and a few faculty knew about it in real time but pretended not to know.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43188980)
|
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 12:13 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Then told me not to tell anyone about the accusation, then continued covering it up. The grade wasn't based on my work. It was secretly punitive. I told the Dean about the situation and then all hell broke loose and the Dean of Students *lied on HLS letterhead* that I told the registrar I didn't want to take finals. She then sent that letter to HLS administrators -- including to herself and to the registrar -- to place me on a leave of absence. A lie that deprived me of my ability to make academic progress, to cover up a false accusation that they *refuse to confirm or deny in writing even happened*. Then wouldn't give me transfer paperwork so I couldn't go anywhere else.
Why wouldn't they acknowledge that they did make an accusation that had a basis?
Oh, that's right. It had no basis. An admission that it occurred is damning (as is a denial that it occurred, because it did indeed occur). So they won't discuss it in writing at all, because no matter what they say, they're either admitting to something they will never want to admit, or they're blatantly lying.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43189082)
|
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 1:38 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
I don’t know who started it. It all happened in the dean of students office, and both she and the dean of students (and to lesser extent one other person involved in LRW/Climenko at HLS) all made comments/accusations.
DN actually said to me “Your closed memo was good/decent, if you did write it yourself.” Then said “What are you going to do differently in order to pass?”
Then Sells made comments too, as described in the imgur link above.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43189312) |
|
Date: September 29th, 2021 12:24 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
I did. None was ever provided. Ever. They now refuse to confirm or deny that there ever even was a plagiarism accusation.
That's right.
They refuse to admit or deny that the accusation even existed, much less acknowledge that it existed or explain its basis.
That's how I know something really bizarre and bad happened. If there was some legitimate reason to question the authorship of my CLOSED MEMO, they would have told me then or would tell me now -- they wouldn't refuse to confirm OR DENY that there was ever a plagiarism accusation at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43194354) |
|
Date: September 29th, 2021 12:28 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
You tell me. I don’t have a magic ball. I don’t know. Listen, take it or leave it. “Be honest” 🙄
Do you know know that some people run around looking for and creating problems? Some are insecure, or have biases, or personality disorders, or are gullible, or just don’t think. Have you ever, like, met people before? Do you have life experience? Do you not think it plausible that a few of those people might work at law schools?
My point is that the way these people behaved was inexplicable. Your response seems to be, “their behavior is inexplicable, therefore there must be some reason you're not telling us!”
No.
The thing that you are searching for -- a legitimate explanation -- does not exist. That's the point.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43195887) |
Date: September 28th, 2021 2:24 AM Author: marvelous business firm
You're obviously guilty of plagiarism.
lol at the idea HLS would accuse a black student without it being 110% bulletproof certain.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43189372) |
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 3:51 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
You are dead wrong, but tell yourself whatever you wish to make yourself feel better. Whatever helps you sleep at night. I don’t need your support, but don’t trash me because you can’t wrap your head around the idea that administrators could royally screw up and then screw up more in hopes of papering over the first screw-up, making it all worse because the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.
Simplistic thinking is your choice. I don’t like it, and you’re wrong, but that isn’t my problem — it is yours.
To say what you said, you must really worship administrators. You must think they are infallible, that they are gods, that they do no wrong and always act wisely.
Not the case.
“lol” at the idea that despite knowing who I am, and knowing that you can contact me, you instead choose not to contact me and to say I am “obviously guilty.” Such a leap of logic is beneath any thinking person.
Go look up my facebook posts and then tell me who is “obviously guilty.”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43189453) |
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 4:42 AM Author: Razzmatazz jet-lagged sneaky criminal deer antler
There's no need to be upset. The pumo is likely trolling; after all, you are poasting, of all places, on a law board that's frequented by maybe two dozen mentally ill lawyers.
But I don't think you get what he's saying. Woke HLS administrators "targeting" a black Elizabeth Warren supporter of all people? All acting in unison even after turnover in one or more of the positions? I'm sure that what you have described has happened before but it's pretty rare, that's all.
What did you do for the last three years? You couldn't find a single lawyer willing to represent you? Sure, HLS may be "intimidating" but not one lawyer agreed to help you? Did you actually go to campus and insist on speaking with the DoS or members of the admin? Did you take it to Dean C's office or reach out to them? Emails are one thing but what I'm talking about here is speaking with someone IRL and explaining what you've just explained to them. Did you appeal the plagiarism charge? Are there any more in person conversations you had with them outside of the ones noted in your pdf? Did you discuss your opposition to the leave of absence with the DoS? The statute is about to run and you're scrambling to do stuff that you should have done immediately. FFS, you shared your complaint mere days before the fall semester began.
I see that you've tweeted your story out and gotten some engagement from journalists. Have any contacted you about a piece that they're willing to do? If it were me, I would send it out to every last "anti-PC/wokeness" (Bari Weiss and Quillette make a living writing about such matters) and "conservative journalist" there is. FWIW, there's a lot of DC attorneys that share that kind of thing in group chats, etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43189475) |
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 12:21 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Thanks. Will respond fully later but:
The Warren stuff was a decade ago. My politics have changed considerably, and so have hers. The CFPB as originally envisioned (a CPSC for retail / consumer credit) and TARP oversight are not hard left lib bs. She’s an ex-republican bankruptcy law specialist. 2010/2011 was a very different time.
It’s not all “acting in unison,” a lot of it is passing the buck and not acting at all.
Lawyers are not *free*. I do not have *money*.
Yes, I went to campus. They refuse to meet and say I need an appointment to be there.
Of course I tried to explain. They don’t care. They literally won’t answer calls or emails.
Of course I discussed my opposition to the leave of absence. It was involuntary. I had no choice in the matter.
There’s a four-page summary of what’s happened on my twitter page. It’s at the end of the pinned thread.
I shared my complaints on Twitter in August of this year, but I’ve been discussing it on Facebook in a handful of posts since May of last year.
Breach of contract claims have a 6-year SOL. Those claims aren't close to expiring yet -- at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43190711)
|
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 12:43 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Goodness gracious. The OGC is not sending its best! I have stories about them too. They aren't really the problem-solving type. It's all rather bizarre. I'm not saying that they're playing checkers and I'm playing chess. I'm saying that the OGC's disposition is "fuck you, you are powerless and don't know anything," and my response through my actions is "ummm...yeah, I'm relatively powerless, but I definitely know a few things..."
Good question about the registrar. A few possibilities:
1. She's on her way out and doesn't want to have to see me or interact with me before she leaves. Her entire office got the link to the audio file and I've copied them on some other things so what happened isn't exactly a secret.
2. Perhaps she didn't lie to/with Sells about me, but instead received the letter with Sells' lie (I know she did, I was on that email) and simply let it stand, which is serious misconduct but not as bad as explicitly lying. It's still really bad, since my education and career were derailed over it and she knew it was a lie but didn't report it or ensure it was retracted or corrected.
3. They're worried she'll sue for wrongful termination and cite the audio file as proof that she shouldn't be punished based on evidence of a supposedly curious origin. Sort of like worrying that your nanny will sue you for wrongful termination after the neighbor's backyard camera happens to catch her abusing your kids (or after the nanny slapped your kid while forgetting that your nannycam was on).
4. She's unionized and fighting it. She's got mouths to feed. Same with the data breach guy (J.Mc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201143)
|
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 2:24 PM Author: bull headed forum wagecucks
Yes! I cross registered and took a course he taught at HGSE (figuring it would be no work). He's absolutely an idiot!
Funny, just looking at the bios of the staff there now (https://ogc.harvard.edu/people) they've got some wildly unimpressive credentials.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201707)
|
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 11:54 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
OH. LOL. Lakshmi Clark won't be sympathetic at all.
1. She was at the plagiarism accusation meeting and so is a witness that it indeed occurred and that Newmark, Sells, and S.T. said the things that they said.
2. She also did two things during exams that were really inappropriate, in writing, and then apparently never told the Administrative Board or others about it. I told faculty about it eventually and it is probably clear to the school that she withheld it from them.
3. In August 2019 when Sells / the Ad Board sent me a letter telling me I must not communicate with ANY current or former Harvard faculty or staff if I ever wished to return (without ever giving a reason for that directive or ever even implying that anyone was instructed not to contact me -- which they never ever did), the person who actually sent the letter, was Laskhmi (though Lakshmi didn't sign it, Jeff did). I have a record of that that I can share here if you'd like. In other words, Lakshmi literally transmitted to me an extralegal gag order and apparently didn't stop to think, "wait, this is really not kosher. wtf am I doing?"
In any event, she messed up. I don't know what she was thinking.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43200963) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 12:16 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Correct, it's basically me vs. the people who cast themselves as the helpers, which makes me really wonder how this happened. Something happened early in my first semester that put me on the other side of these people, and for the life of me, I don't know what it is, but it wasn't something I actually did (objectionable speech, conduct, etc.) or something that was true. Whatever it was, it was either something simply untrue, or something about me they didn't like, which is why I still consider the possibility that it was motivated by some sort of racial or religious animus and/or political bias (AIPAC board membership which was on my LinkedIn and on FB posts, coming back from Israel the first day of orientation with photos of it all over my FB page, following Thomas Sowell and Peggy Noonan on Twitter when I only followed like 15 accounts and had never posted).
I believe Sells was quietly removed because of the audio file distribution (proving that she had made a false statement in the May 2018 leave letter), and also because of a number of emails I sent in the fall of 2020 to Sells, copying HLS faculty and others, directly accusing her of misconduct and challenging her to deny it in writing (which she never did, at all!), and finally because I and others had received a whistleblower report about misconduct by Sells against a different student years ago (it was apparently mass emailed) and I forwarded it in an email in late January to HLS leadership, university leadership, most full-time faculty, most hls administrative staff, and, ugh, fuck it, Ronan Farrow and the student newspaper. That was on a Friday around 5PM. Sells' resignation was announced the following Monday.
As for JM, I do *NOT* know WTF is going on, at all. Truly. I have theories, but they are too zany to utter at this time.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201032) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 12:33 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Listen, I get that. How do you think *I* felt experiencing such bizarre behavior from her?
As for the Met Opera, who knows. Listen, Sells "resigned," whether it was as an option she was given as an alternative to termination, or she just saw the writing on the wall without saying anything, I don't know. But she didn't even finish the school year. She left in February 2021. The opera wasn't even running; it just reopened recently. Surely she could have waited until May, at least on paper, if she was not being given the axe.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201103)
|
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 1:06 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Thank you! That's what never made sense to me.
It almost seems like the simplest explanations are the most likely ones:
1. I wrote a good paper without any help and they thought, "it's too good to be by BeeBee." Thoughtless and rude, and maybe even a little racist, but it's possible.
2. Someone copied from me. I would often put my drafts in the garbage in the library when done marking them and implementing my marks. I'm a prolific printer (I kill trees and just don't care) and I do hand markups almost exclusively, though when others are involved in drafting I'll typically then convert my hand markup to tracked changes.
(I'm not a biglaw partner yet, though I look forward to the day that I can simply hand my chickenscratch to a first-year associate and not have to put in tracked changes myself.)
3. Bias/malice/discrimination/political persecution. But WHY? Am I *that* important (or detestable)? I think not! But...🤔
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201259)
|
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 1:09 PM Author: judgmental glassy hospital
exactly. it was in your interest to keep it private too. even if you are ultimately exonerated, there will be people that have their doubts about you just because you wound up in this situation. just look at people itt that just can't believe it. like, i'm not saying you're definitely 100% right since there are almost always two sides to a story, but i'm not foreclosing it either. but there will always be people that assume that something must have happened for you to wind up in this situation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAqezBjtAOk&ab_channel=amc
this scene brought tears to my eyes the first time i watched it
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43190968) |
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 1:21 PM Author: judgmental glassy hospital
i understand completely.
when i was going through a situation similar to yours, the worst part was having to explain the situation to people constantly, and that gnawing feeling that you know they have their doubts. like, interviewing for a job is bad enough, it's 1000x worse when you know they going to ask "why did you take leave from HLS" and you have go through your whole spiel, knowing that a lot of people are going to just think "this guy clearly plagiarized and got the boot". and even if they do want to hire you, they're thinking "this guy is going to leave if he ever gets readmitted".
it was definitely in your and hls's interest to keep in private, ideally you could have resolved this privately and come up with some bullshit excuse for taking a couple years leave when discussing it later. going public against an institution as big and influential as hls takes balls. i'm rooting for you brother.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43191020) |
|
Date: September 28th, 2021 2:27 PM Author: judgmental glassy hospital
on the contrary, i think employers will consider that you tried to handle this internally for three fucking years before being forced to go public. you've tried and sacrificed even though you've been mistreated. if i was an employer i would think you're definitely *not* the type jump these tactics for a grievance.
also, although this is going to lose you points with shitlib lawyers, don't discount how much this may benefit you with fedsoc lawyers. i'm heavily involved in fedsoc and there are a ton of people who seethe about how the minority ideology is mistreated. like, if you wind up applying for clerkships plenty of fedsoc judges are going to look at your situation and want to help you because of your mistreatment and stick it to libs.
have you reached out to fedsoc yet? you should absolutely get in touch with the ma and boston lawyer's division.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43191418) |
Date: September 28th, 2021 2:09 PM Author: low-t kitchen dog poop
You're wasting time by posting here.
Consider just putting this all behind you and getting on with your life.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43191313) |
|
Date: September 29th, 2021 12:30 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
There's one thing that should make the scales tilt in my favor: the fact that I don't know who any of you are on this forum, but do know that more than a few of you are lawyers or law students or law professors, some of whom can reach out to people you know at HLS and get the scoop off the record. You don't have to believe me if you can independently confirm that what I allege is true, and many people on this website are in the position to do precisely that. I've gone into such detail that you can just, like, ask. Obviously, none of the people involved (or even other faculty) would admit in writing to knowing about this, but those of you who have personal relationships can ask your friends (or even family) who are in the faculty or administration.
In that sense, I don't entirely need to establish credibility if nobody in a position to know is willing to deny it, even privately and off the record to you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43194372) |
Date: September 30th, 2021 1:17 AM Author: soggy mildly autistic area potus
If this isn't flame, there's something deeply wrong with you bud. You had years to move on with your life but you kept beating your head against this cause, which clearly does not seem to have legs on a pragmatic basis (I also question your judgment in that you keep going at this despite not being able to obtain or even have the money for a lawyer - like wtf dude, how are you supporting yourself so far? Uber?)
Also maybe thank your stars that you didn't have to go into law. Do you think Darth Sells is the only sociopath in law? There's so many of them. Maybe youre obsessed with just getting the HLS credential but who gives a shit? There's like almost a 1000 lawyers churned out each year from HYS and even more from the T14. No one in the real world gives a crap you went to HLS. Your obsession with getting the credential might suggest you have some kind of JJC-level fixation. If you just want to be a lawyer--and can't go to a reputable grad/law school--try going to an unaccredited school and do the California Bar. A former LA Mayor graduated from the People's College of Law -> if you really just keep working at it and love the LAW then you'll be ok.
Also there's plenty of ppl who make it in this world with just a BA. If I was an employer I'd think you're legit crazy and would autistically go after me like rain man if you felt wronged.
Why not give this up and start thinking of other ways to pick yourself up. Tech is a good industry that doesn't care too much about your academic credentials/work experience. There's a whole world out there you could find value/be valued in instead of working with a bunch of nebbish law shitheads.
Finally, paging OLDHlsdude is weird man. He's friggin retired, graduated from LS decades ago and has no connection to HLS or the legal industry - its odd you'd try to get his help. He's really just XO's father figure giving discursive advice and telling stories; the guy's checked out otherwise. Clearly you seem to act and think in a way that rubs people the wrong way in politically correct environment. The fact that no one has gone to bat for you in any way that makes a difference suggests that they know well not to take on your cause. It's a fools errand tbh.
Avoid industries that focus on politics and social aspects. Give this shit up and go do autistic things (which you are likely more good at). You could have done a coding bootcamp or some other shit 2-3 years ago and have been well on your way in an alternate career by now (and making a decent salary).
PS, buy some SOL and SOL shitcoins.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43199684) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 1:39 AM Author: soggy mildly autistic area potus
That's called life dude. There's plenty of fields where if you run afoul of Bigfoot "random sociopathic heathen" where you're fucked and your life changes. Like I know a dude who went to a US Med School, pissed off his residency director (he was drummed out unfairly on some nebulous aspects of "professionalism"), contract didn't get renewed and now is an untouchable in medicine. He has $300k in debt and is looking to change careers. Right now he is no joke delivering for food apps.
Why do you have no money? Just because you were iced from law/grad school doesn't mean you can't get a job. You dont need to go to B-School.
Finally, OldHLSDude's silence here is telling. There's nothing really to be gained from engaging with you. Your story is just weird and awkward man. It doesn't really engender much sympathy for you (and I dislike people like the administration at places like HLS). You're in a privileged situation still; trying to classify this like the Dreyfus Affair is just odd, goes against the current, and isn't doing you any favors.
I know not having the paperwork is limiting your options but just mentally put it out of your head then. Stop banging your head against the wall.
Learn to code, join a startup, even fucking teaching in Asia would have been better off than whining your ass off doing jack shit and having literally "no money". If youre smart enough for HLS there's something wrong with you if you can't find any kind of gainful employment.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43199740) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 2:06 AM Author: soggy mildly autistic area potus
i looked at your linkedin and dropbox statement.
1 - so you have been doing something. you haven't been able to save 50k from this job? if this job doesnt pay well then why not find something that does? tech is one option.
2- furthermore, why is your case so unpersuasive so that no one wants to do it pro bono or for cheap? you retort that the HLS mafia has a stranglehold in MA, but then that's almost QED on why you should let this go on a legal basis.
3 - if HLS JD Admissions says you can reapply and the evil Dean is gone, does that mean you can get a letter of standing to reapply? if so, forget about HLS, just reapply to other law schools in that case. if not, then go to unaccredited law school or foreign school or something like that if you really wanna LAW
4 - i suspect you'll respond to this indignantly claiming i still dont know shit and that you are valiantly fighting the forces of evil. look, your story is really not that interesting. i suspect much of xo feels the same way. its a bad rub man, but this isn't the end of the world. the people you fought with at HLS sound like cowards, sociopaths, shitheads. i agree with you that they should go down but these are dark times all over and far greater indignities/humiliations to good people are happening every day.
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/956766
like this guy had the cash to litigate but its also an indication that there's probably tons of these kind of indignities/admin abuse out there that go unheard of in higher ed. prob another sign that further time spent in education is not the way to go.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43199786) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 2:41 AM Author: soggy mildly autistic area potus
fair points but its no bueno then. it sounds like youre screwed then without much recourse.
this is probably the most relevant part of what i think you should be asking the old-mos on xo "It's one thing to encourage me to not let more time be taken from me, that's great and that's something to discuss"
(most xo law-mos prob wont have tips on fighting HLS that you haven't considered already)
as to the story sharing part, i didnt go to HLS but a T6 and honestly it was pretty lousy. there was some camaraderie during 1L that was fun but the majority of the kids I met were tools. furthermore, law school was a really bad career move in retrospect (and I was magna/secondary journal)
i'd have gone into tech or some other innovative/more autistic-friendly career; i'd be way happier/wealthier than i am now.
so i guess i'm curious as to whether you enjoyed LS and what you wanna do with a law degree
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43199804) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 3:02 AM Author: soggy mildly autistic area potus
not a litigator, am in IP. did a shitty job in research before LS. dont really want to say more but my background is pretty generic for guys in my area.
based on what youre saying it sounds like youre still interested in high pay/prestige jobs. maybe youre a good fit for them.
as for me i'm really not into the whole mentality behind biglaw/similarly prestigious jobs. so i guess my perspective wont be particularly useful. for me the best parts of being on this forum have been learning more about dudes like CSLG (who made millions off shitlaw), and the crypto guys.
i think i've said all that needs to be said from my perspective on your situation. hope some of it helped or was at least thought provoking. good luck man, it might be hard but try to stay positive.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43199821) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 1:53 AM Author: soggy mildly autistic area potus
You're acting like this should be some kind of a national outrage where the ACLU should be fighting tooth and nail on your behalf. Have you picked up the newspaper recently and seen how crazy the world is?
If you can't get someone to rally to your cause in any effective way then that should be an indication that you might not have the wind behind you--socially, politically, financially--to get the kind of justice you seek.
The more you nitpick and obsess over this, the crazier you seem man.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43199772) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 1:59 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
I’m acting like it should be a national outrage? Not necessarily. I’m saying it’s outrageous and I wrote about it on Twitter and on this forum. You’re depicting this as some sort of massive “crying wolf” campaign, even though you hadn’t heard a damn thing about it until a few days ago.
People tend to be concerned with their lives, dude. When people are in acrimonious disputes or divorces, those situations sometimes go on for years, and those situations impact their lives in real ways and they often “nitpick and obsess,” because the stakes are high and the situation matters to them. That’s life too.
Some people “nitpick and obsess” for years over difficulty conceiving and carrying a child to term. “Oh, it’s been a few years and it hasn’t happened? Get over it, loser! That’s life, dummy! You’ll never be parents! Stop trying! Stop pretending it’s a national emergency! You’re so lame for not giving up despite the deck being stacked against you! What a fucking loser!”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43199778) |
Date: September 30th, 2021 9:39 AM Author: bull headed forum wagecucks
I've not been following this too closely but can you clarify whether you are saying you were withdrawn from the law school or are you saying they placed you on a leave of abscence?
Either way it would make sense that you wouldn't be able to transfer because you haven't completed the first year courses which is required for transferring anywhere. Rather than continue this fight have you thought about just applying somewhere else as a 1l?
Did all this go down in the first or second semester? Did you continue attending classes and try to take the finals and they just wouldn't let you sit them?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43200329) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 12:06 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
1. Correct. A voluntary leave has to be initiated by the student in writing. It can be personal, medical, or academic. I even requested that my involuntary academic leave be converted to a voluntary academic leave in September 2018 (as the 2018-2019 Handbook provided for, for the first time, such a conversion "ordinarily"), yet Sells denied that request for no logical reason, without even asserting that for whatever reason my situation was not "ordinar[y]" for purposes of applying the involAcLeave -> volAcLeave conversion provision.
2. No, Sells placed me on an involuntary academic leave by claiming that I told the registrar that I wouldn't be finishing exams, citing section X-D-6 of the HLS Handbook. Interestingly, the 2017-2018 Handbook in effect when I was placed on leave, didn't even say that one could be placed on involuntary academic leave for merely not having taken one's exams (though they added that as of the 2018-2019 edition). Rather, in 2017-2018, it stated, "6. Unfulfilled academic requirements. The student has not met an academic requirement and has not taken steps acceptable to the School to meet the requirement." Sells' false statement that I had told the registrar I wouldn't be finishing exams seems to have been quite intentionally stated, for the purpose of being able to claim that I had "not taken steps acceptable to the School" to complete exams. It seems that she knew she needed to essentially say I was not attempting to take exams, and so she lied that I had gone to the registrar and said that I *wouldn't* be finishing exams.
Too bad there ended up being an audio file of that very conversation between me and the registrar proving that I *never* said that, that I clearly said the exact opposite repeatedly and unmistakably, and that I went to the registrar to discuss a separate but related issue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201004) |
Date: September 30th, 2021 10:08 AM Author: wine narrow-minded bawdyhouse messiness
In some sense you have come to the right place because this is a forum full of people with difficult personalities who have navigated through prestigious schools. I suspect that most of us have had similar run-ins with deranged admins and profs. But the lesson you should be drawing is to work on interpersonal and conflict resolution skills, rather than endless autistic documentation of the minutia of how others wronged you.
I’ll give you my personal examples in case it helps. I took a lecture/discussion group course with a rising star prof. She was boring as fuck and did not welcome class participation, so I would typically read the assigned textbook in class. This pissed her off and she called me out on it. I could maybe see this point if I was doing something totally unrelated to class (although all law profs now seem to have accepted that modern students cannot function without an open laptop and if you sit it then back you can see that everyone fucks around). Then she came to my discussion group one week and proceeded to basically continue lecturing. I tried to debate with her because (a) it’s a discussion section and (b) apparently I’m not allowed to kick back and get some reading done. I’m sure I was argumentative and wrong. But I didn’t scream at her or go off topic or say anything inappropriate. Somehow this led to going in front of a dean with her. Fortunately for me the dean was reasonable and just listened to both of us and concluded “ok, whatever.” The prof then fucked me on my final grade and I let it go. I probably could have escalated the situation to where I got kicked out of college and spent the rest of my life living in my mom’s basement but decided against it.
Bonus story from a few years later: I has another blow hard prod that I did not respect. I did a shitty job on the first few assignments and was not a big class participant. Then I crushed the final paper because I got obsessively interested in some ideas. He gave me no grade and called me to his office. He asked a bunch of weird questions about my paper. Then he made a weird plagiarism accusation with no evidence other than “paper was too good.” But I kept calm and he dropped it because he realized that he had no evidence. To his credit, this guy then gave me a fair grade.
You’re now thinking “my situation is different because the dean was unreasonable!” Sure. You still have the burden to work through other people’s unreasonable behavior to get what you want. Not everything is a must-win battle for dominance and objective truth. Let some shit go.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43200468)
|
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 7:05 PM Author: soggy mildly autistic area potus
this guys advice is tcr.
if this happened just recently i'd say that it might be worth it but right now youre just languishing in Siberia tilting at windmills.
your fixation and obsession with not letting some "bureaucrats" get one over you would legitimately make me question your judgment and maturity. there has to be an end to this at some point even if you take an L and i hope it doesnt consume more years/you grind it down to the bitter end.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43203112) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 11:22 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Perhaps the biggest issue, and I have raised this with HLS, is that the dean of students, perhaps without the knowledge of most faculty, but with the knowledge of other administrators, sent me a letter in August 2018 stating "you must refrain from discussing your leave with others, including other Harvard administrators, faculty, or staff," and sent me another letter in August 2019 in which she decreed that I must not communicate with any CURRENT OR FORMER HLS OR HARVARD UNIVERSITY FACULTY OR STAFF if I ever wished to return from leave. As a result, I could not speak to rabbis, faculty, dispute resolution bodies, confidential resources, or even the university ombudsman without risking my education and career. In order to resolve conflicts and handle complicated interpersonal situations, the people involved need resources, support, guidance, advice, and so on. This dean of students intentionally took that away from me so that I could not get help. She did this on HLS letterhead and even signed her name to it. It was like she was trying to disable me. She was extremely abusive - not just "unreasonable." It wasn't normal at all and it wasn't university or HLS policy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43200794) |
Date: September 30th, 2021 2:16 PM Author: bull headed forum wagecucks
BeeBee, do you have a copy of your transcript? How do they list the courses you took in the spring? How do they describe your status?
Do you have any HLS profs who'd write you a LofR?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201669)
|
|
Date: September 30th, 2021 2:47 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
I have no idea how it looks now, as I no longer have access to the unofficial transcript portal. They list my spring courses as two grades (for spring LRW and for an upper-level course), and three W's (for the exams I didn't get to take). I imagine it says "on leave" for each academic term (Fall, January, Spring) from Fall 2018 through Spring 2021 and then says "Withdrawn May 2021" at the bottom somewhere.
In addition to stating to me in May 2021 that I am supposedly withdrawn, they said at the same time that my Fall 2017 matriculation is closed, and that I could reapply for admission "but there is no guarantee that you would be readmitted" (or something along those lines). They said this all after it was too late for me to apply to study anywhere this fall as a 1L.
They never provided the good standing letter / dean's certification I would need to reapply anywhere as a first-year (including grad/prof schools other than law schools), which, again, could even state that I did NOT leave HLS in good standing (if that indeed is HLS's position despite their unwillingness to say that for three years), provided that the letter includes a written explanation as to *why* I supposedly did not leave in good standing.
I don't think they'll ever produce that letter, both because (a) if I indeed was not in good standing, they wouldn't have waited three years to start saying it, and (b) in September 2018 I pushed for Sells to provide me a letter stating that I was not on disciplinary leave, and after a month she finally did. That letter had a typo in it -- but I did get it. It was a two sentence letter stating "You are on leave as of May 2018. You are *a* not on a disciplinary leave."
Curiously, in Dean M's email announcing Sells' departure, the second sentence of the email had a similar typo! It read "While this will be a great *a* loss for the Law School," which is why the Crimson article quoting it reads:
---
"“While this will be a great...loss for the law school, it is an exciting professional opportunity for Dean Sells, who, in this newly created role, will help lead the Metropolitan Opera into its next chapter,” Law School Dean John F. Manning ’82 wrote in an email.
---
Something to think about!
As for a LoR, maybe one or two profs would write one if only to help smooth my exit, but I doubt. Frankly, I think some are nervous to assist not because I did anything wrong but because they know I didn't. Not really sure though. One HLS prof liked a tweet of mine the other day. I've spoken to one by phone, in the spring, who said he thought it was highly likely I'd be allowed to resume/restart my studies this fall term. I guess he was wrong. I really trusted and liked him, and still do! I'm just not sure why the powers that be decided to go the "involuntary withdrawal" route, contrary to the Handbook. Puzzling.
I do have my original LORs from when I applied to law school still in the LSAC system. Three are from attorneys at an old workplace (the first place I worked out of college, W -- very cool place and a great experience), though one of those three letters is written for a specific school. I also have on file a fourth LOR from an attorney at a different pre-HLS workplace, and I am sure that LOR was also very helpful.
What are you thinking?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43201839) |
|
Date: October 1st, 2021 9:14 AM Author: bull headed forum wagecucks
If I were you I'd get a copy of my current transcript so you can see for sure what it currently says. I was trying to think of a way a goodstanding cert might be an educational record you'd have a right to under FERPA but I'm striking out, and IIRC there's no private cause of action under FERPA anyway.
Speaking of the goodstanding letter, how do you know that they won't provide something (whatever it might say)? I could be wrong, but aren't those usually provided to other schools or bar admission bodies? I could see how they might not release one to you. I'd try to figure out some org that would require one and see if they'll send it to them directly (preferably one where you might have an in and can see what they are saying).
I think your best option is to try to lay the groundwork to apply somewhere else as a transfer. You'd be short of few of the courses but someone might bite. Columbia loves those tuition dollars (well, they all do, really). I don't think there's any way HLS will let you back in and I'm doubtful you'd be able to compel them to absent a little luck and a hell of a lot of money. Even if successful, you'd be talking about years of litigation.
I think if I were in your position (and I still wanted to go to law school) I'd try again as a 1l or a transfer (I'd go transfer, personally). As part of that approach I'd take down all the materials related to this so that it's not immediately retrievable on the internet. I'd craft some statement about the withdrawls from the courses on the transcript that is vague and isn't inculpatory. Then again, it might be easier as a 1l admit, since they'll get your lsat score to report and they'd get a diverse student. You might even talk them into giving you credit for the completed courses. So I guess I'd try that first since that cycle comes up before the transfer window opens.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43205440) |
|
Date: October 1st, 2021 1:54 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
1. Correct, there's no private cause of action under FERPA. The most that usually happens is a school is fined $50K and ED collects (or, hell, perhaps doesn't collect).
2. I asked for it repeatedly. The first time, Sells declined, stating that I could not have it "as [you] are on leave" which makes no sense because alumni, enrolled students, AND students on leaves of absence need the letters to apply elsewhere (including PhD programs or joint degree programs). They are often sent to the recipients you described, but not exclusively so, and the Law School's document request form allows for any requested document listed on that form to be sent to any listed recipient. See "Document Request Form" at https://hls.harvard.edu/dept/registrar/policies-and-forms/.
3. Sells graduated from Columbia and was their dean of students for a couple of years in the 90s. She's also on the board of trustees at Barnard and used to be an administrator at Columbia (community relations, I think; someone on another thread said she was passed over for more senior positions there). She'll probably try to screw me over with CLS if she hasn't already. I did get into CLS before though.
4. CLS or not, if I sought 1L admission or transfer admission anywhere, I would have to retake the LSAT, as one needs an LSAT (or GRE) score that is less than five years old for either kind of application (seriously). I told HLS repeatedly about this issue throughout this leave of absence and then the rug was pulled out from under me in May anyway, leaving me with nowhere to go this year. It's just not right. They totally boxed me in.
5. Thoughts on seeking a preliminary injunction seeking a reversal of the withdrawal, on the grounds that I will lose another year of my education / career, for no good reason and contrary to my efforts, if the withdrawal (which was contrary to HLS's own amendment of its Handbook as of the 2020-2021 edition) is not reversed?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43206708)
|
|
Date: October 7th, 2021 9:19 AM Author: bull headed forum wagecucks
In terms of the goodstanding cert, I'm imagining in Harvard's eyes that you are well and truly withdrawn at this point. So a goodstanding cert is probably not going to be forthcoming because, to them, you aren't in goodstanding.
What if you ask them for an enrollment status? Surely you have a right to something like that? They can give you something that says you're not currently enrolled and you could send that along with your transfer apps with an addendum explaining the withdrawl (without the backstory, of course; I know it makes sense to you but as an adcomm I'd run for the hills if I were sent your full memo).
I don't think Sells' previous history at Columbia would necessarily change anything with CLS. I think you're overestimating how industrious adcoms are, especially for transfers whose stats don't effect rankings. But you only need to get one to work; if CLS says no maybe another fine law center will bite.
I don't think having to take the lsat again is really that big an impediment, frankly. It sucks, but that shouldn't stop you.
In terms of suing HLS, I'm not a litigation-mo, so I don't know. My wild ass guess is that you've got very little chance of success and almost certainly don't have the financial resources (or the years it would take to complete) to spare.
I'd still vote with scrubbing all mention of this from the internet to the extent possible and trying to soft peddle the withdrawl in hopes of transferring. As it stands now, I think you're in a "doobsian" scenario, where merely googling your name is going to kill you with adcoms.
But that's just my .02 and I could be full of shit. You'd need a litmo to chime in on your litigation prospects.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43235565) |
|
Date: October 8th, 2021 1:41 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Hmm. Thanks.
Here's the "good standing" requirement at Stanford, as an example:
https://law.stanford.edu/apply/how-to-apply/transfer-application-process/
https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/DEANS-CERTIFICATION-FORM-2018.pdf
HLS won't even commit to signing the form, even though it is a *requirement* and even though I have explained in writing that a good standing letter can say a student was NOT in good standing along with a brief explanation as to why.
An enrollment verification can be done by me without HLS. It can be done via the National Student Clearinghouse by me, and admissions officers can also do it themselves (which I'm sure they do when they feel like double-checking an application they're on the fence about). I don't think sending an enrollment verification would change the fact that a school would expect the sort of form I linked above to be completed by HLS, or, alternatively, a letter from HLS. To be clear, a good standing letter is a letter *regarding* one's good standing -- or lack thereof, and if the student is no longer enrolled/affiliated, then the letter is about whether they *left* in good standing. Either way -- whether relating to current or past standing, and whether the answer is that I was in good standing or not -- HLS has to send the letter answering those questions, and if they decline to answer in the affirmative, they have to say why. They do it for students all the time. Why not me?
Why not say "you did not leave in good standing because [reason]"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43239949) |
|
Date: October 8th, 2021 11:02 AM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
I informed the HLS Administrative Board of what exactly the good standing letter requirement entails, and I showed a professor the SLS form as an example so it was clear what it was that I needed from HLS. He asked me whether I knew of an administrator who would sign it. I said that it would almost certainly have to be by the Dean of Students or the dean of HLS, and I don't know who else could or would. The administration is ignoring that completely. They wouldn't commit to filling it out. They just said nothing.
The Dean of Students (now gone), Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs, and the Administrative Board chair are all on the Administrative Board through which the Dean of Students was formalizing all of her crazy bullshit behavior. I don't think any of them will give me the good standing letter because I think they care most about not doing anything that might support my claim that this whole thing was unjustified (e.g., a letter that says I am in good standing or that I was in good standing when I was actively enrolled). Which brings me back to the question: if I'm NOT in good standing (or if I was not in good standing prior to no longer being actively enrolled), why won't they sign something that says that and explain why?
Perhaps because something else -- something unstated -- was motivating placing me on leave, and now they know it isn't true. Perhaps they believed (or wanted to believe, or were told by Sells) that I did something wrong and that I knew what that something was, ergo, I would not dare ask for a good standing letter and would go quietly into the night. And then, after I kept asking for the letter, they dug into things (as they should have to begin with) and "realized" I didn't do anything wrong, at which point they realized that they couldn't justify not having already given me a good standing letter that said I was in good standing, and also realized they couldn't justify giving me a good standing letter that said I was NOT in good standing...because they now could not deny that I had been in good standing all along.
As for filling out the form myself, I think they'd love for me to shoot myself in the foot by playing fast and loose with the truth in hopes of moving forward so they can say, "See?! He's dishonest."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43241355) |
|
Date: October 1st, 2021 3:30 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
I've just requested both a transcript and a good standing letter.
Current/enrolled students and alumni who graduated within the last year don't have to pay for transcripts. Non-enrolled individuals who did not graduate within the last year, or who are not alumni, have to pay. I don't have the $11 to spare so I marked "current student" and "enrolled." Let's see if they try to nickel and dime me over 11 dollars I don't really have and then claim that I need to fork it over one way or another because I supposedly am "involuntarily withdrawn" (contrary to the Handbook in effect at the time at which they claim I was "involuntarily withdrawn.")
I also requested a good standing letter. Let's see if they provide it, and if so, what it says.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43207217) |
|
Date: October 3rd, 2021 10:26 AM Author: bull headed forum wagecucks
Honestly, my first thought is I don't think you help yourself by sending these emails to such an enormous list of individuals. I can see how you'd get to this place psychologically, but frankly I think it makes you seem a bit off-kilter to include everyone under the sun on the email. I think it's counterproductive.
Secondly, I don't know how much you want discussed on the chat boart, but I'm not sure the materials you presented read as you intend them; I wasn't left thinking Sells was out of control and vindictive (though she may very well be) but that the person in the text messages had mental problems and was maybe not the most reliable narrator. In short, it didn't seem anything at all like a smoking gun to me.
If I were you I'd go back to square one and the initial accusation. Assuming you didn't plagarize, it's hard to come up with a reason for the accusation. One of the reasons might be that you're black. So I might try a civil rights complaint approach. Make a complaint that they falsely accused you (and didn't follow normal procedures outlined in the handbook) because you were black. It doesn't seem that far-fetched based on your side of things.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43214148) |
|
Date: October 1st, 2021 6:15 PM Author: Umber Travel Guidebook
Thoughts? Perhaps a few other XO people should see this. I take no joy in this, but this really cannot go on.
If anyone else is interested, I will send.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4926664&forum_id=2#43207826)
|
|
|