Notice of lawsuit pending vs. certain AutoAdmit posters
| lake rambunctious church building | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | mildly autistic slimy cruise ship cuckoldry | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | mildly autistic slimy cruise ship cuckoldry | 06/11/07 | | mildly autistic slimy cruise ship cuckoldry | 06/11/07 | | pontificating yapping menage | 06/11/07 | | mildly autistic slimy cruise ship cuckoldry | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Histrionic olive center | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | overrated theater | 06/12/07 | | Motley Fanboi | 06/12/07 | | vibrant crackhouse alpha | 09/03/07 | | curious principal's office | 06/11/07 | | metal nursing home | 06/11/07 | | angry ticket booth psychic | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Charismatic disrespectful hall newt | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Charismatic disrespectful hall newt | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/12/07 | | Razzmatazz generalized bond | 06/19/07 | | Idiotic hissy fit | 06/11/07 | | Boyish navy property dog poop | 06/11/07 | | Territorial at-the-ready death wish | 06/11/07 | | light house black woman | 06/11/07 | | erotic up-to-no-good locale | 06/12/07 | | crimson garrison kitty | 08/28/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Swashbuckling Plaza | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Swashbuckling Plaza | 06/11/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | pontificating yapping menage | 06/11/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren | 06/11/07 | | adventurous low-t feces | 06/11/07 | | Supple geriatric immigrant hospital | 06/12/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | hilarious faggot firefighter | 06/11/07 | | mildly autistic slimy cruise ship cuckoldry | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | adventurous low-t feces | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | pontificating yapping menage | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Henna idea he suggested | 06/11/07 | | fuchsia violent trailer park community account | 06/12/07 | | cerebral halford | 06/12/07 | | Spectacular gunner institution | 06/12/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | fuchsia violent trailer park community account | 06/12/07 | | Spectacular gunner institution | 06/12/07 | | pontificating yapping menage | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | pontificating yapping menage | 06/11/07 | | Henna idea he suggested | 06/11/07 | | adventurous low-t feces | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | mildly autistic slimy cruise ship cuckoldry | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | adventurous low-t feces | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/11/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/12/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | light house black woman | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | pontificating yapping menage | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | shivering mediation | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | milky nubile new version | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Orchid confused associate partner | 06/12/07 | | Drab dilemma | 06/12/07 | | Orchid confused associate partner | 06/12/07 | | ungodly meetinghouse weed whacker | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Spruce Bearded National Security Agency | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | Floppy forum sneaky criminal | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | Misanthropic orchestra pit juggernaut | 06/12/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | startling mind-boggling coldplay fan | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Racy stag film | 06/11/07 | | Provocative Azure Theater Stage | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | hairraiser hell | 06/11/07 | | dashing charcoal famous landscape painting | 06/11/07 | | hairraiser hell | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | hairraiser hell | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Obsidian diverse parlor | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Black sex offender puppy | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Obsidian diverse parlor | 06/11/07 | | adventurous low-t feces | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Obsidian diverse parlor | 06/11/07 | | erotic up-to-no-good locale | 06/12/07 | | Territorial at-the-ready death wish | 06/11/07 | | startling mind-boggling coldplay fan | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | hairraiser hell | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Floppy forum sneaky criminal | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Zombie-like haunted graveyard | 06/11/07 | | adventurous low-t feces | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | Obsidian diverse parlor | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | thriller headpube | 06/12/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | French Rehab | 06/11/07 | | Spruce Bearded National Security Agency | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | Opaque beta trust fund | 06/12/07 | | Misanthropic orchestra pit juggernaut | 06/12/07 | | Opaque beta trust fund | 06/12/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/12/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | godawful chrome state | 06/11/07 | | Duck-like kitchen voyeur | 06/11/07 | | Spruce Bearded National Security Agency | 06/11/07 | | Zombie-like haunted graveyard | 06/11/07 | | titillating international law enforcement agency | 06/11/07 | | carmine sticky corner half-breed | 06/12/07 | | violent awkward base | 04/11/08 | | Arousing Corn Cake | 06/28/08 | | glittery knife | 06/11/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | concupiscible resort | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Obsidian diverse parlor | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Zombie-like haunted graveyard | 06/11/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/11/07 | | startling mind-boggling coldplay fan | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | startling mind-boggling coldplay fan | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | maroon galvanic party of the first part karate | 06/11/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/11/07 | | maroon galvanic party of the first part karate | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | cordovan lay | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | cordovan lay | 06/11/07 | | maroon galvanic party of the first part karate | 06/11/07 | | maroon galvanic party of the first part karate | 06/11/07 | | Purple Useless Brakes Church | 06/12/07 | | Zombie-like haunted graveyard | 06/11/07 | | Obsidian diverse parlor | 06/11/07 | | Claret Contagious Faggotry Indian Lodge | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Idiotic hissy fit | 06/11/07 | | Spruce Bearded National Security Agency | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | beady-eyed judgmental native | 06/11/07 | | maroon galvanic party of the first part karate | 06/11/07 | | Claret Contagious Faggotry Indian Lodge | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Floppy forum sneaky criminal | 06/11/07 | | flesh whorehouse giraffe | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | flesh whorehouse giraffe | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | flesh whorehouse giraffe | 06/11/07 | | slippery shrine | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | flesh whorehouse giraffe | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/12/07 | | beady-eyed judgmental native | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | coral passionate stead place of business | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | cordovan lay | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | tan big-titted bawdyhouse | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Ruddy goyim parlour | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | cerebral halford | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | shimmering fragrant stage | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | shimmering fragrant stage | 06/11/07 | | Rough-skinned set boltzmann | 06/11/07 | | Stubborn spot | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Stubborn spot | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Cobalt windowlicker dysfunction | 06/11/07 | | Stubborn spot | 06/11/07 | | Emerald den | 06/11/07 | | Stubborn spot | 06/11/07 | | shivering mediation | 06/11/07 | | amber effete tanning salon | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Wonderful slate university electric furnace | 06/11/07 | | Brindle odious senate | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | amber effete tanning salon | 06/11/07 | | dashing charcoal famous landscape painting | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | dashing charcoal famous landscape painting | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/11/07 | | dashing charcoal famous landscape painting | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/11/07 | | dashing charcoal famous landscape painting | 06/12/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/11/07 | | underhanded electric field crotch | 06/11/07 | | Ocher trump supporter school cafeteria | 06/11/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | Ocher trump supporter school cafeteria | 06/12/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | beady-eyed judgmental native | 06/11/07 | | Deep Trip Stock Car | 06/11/07 | | Vengeful pink macaca | 06/11/07 | | Onyx razzle old irish cottage | 06/11/07 | | shimmering fragrant stage | 06/11/07 | | bipolar sound barrier | 06/11/07 | | topaz sadistic sanctuary athletic conference | 06/11/07 | | Onyx razzle old irish cottage | 06/11/07 | | light house black woman | 06/12/07 | | Onyx razzle old irish cottage | 06/11/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/11/07 | | Lime step-uncle's house | 06/11/07 | | Provocative Azure Theater Stage | 06/11/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | Ocher trump supporter school cafeteria | 06/12/07 | | Ocher trump supporter school cafeteria | 06/12/07 | | Bat shit crazy school | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Bat shit crazy school | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Bat shit crazy school | 06/12/07 | | Provocative Azure Theater Stage | 06/12/07 | | Bat shit crazy school | 06/12/07 | | Provocative Azure Theater Stage | 06/12/07 | | Bat shit crazy school | 06/12/07 | | Provocative Azure Theater Stage | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/11/07 | | Lascivious Ratface Gas Station | 06/12/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/11/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/11/07 | | Spectacular gunner institution | 06/12/07 | | heady stage | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | exhilarant dingle berry pozpig | 06/12/07 | | Big Address Round Eye | 06/12/07 | | vigorous selfie station | 06/12/07 | | pontificating yapping menage | 06/12/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/12/07 | | Big Address Round Eye | 06/12/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | Talented temple affirmative action | 06/12/07 | | massive nibblets | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | fuchsia violent trailer park community account | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | fuchsia violent trailer park community account | 06/12/07 | | buck-toothed site wagecucks | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | green laughsome theatre potus | 06/12/07 | | Pungent unhinged abode gay wizard | 06/12/07 | | fuchsia violent trailer park community account | 06/12/07 | | Pungent unhinged abode gay wizard | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Aromatic Business Firm | 06/12/07 | | erotic up-to-no-good locale | 06/12/07 | | exciting home toaster | 06/12/07 | | appetizing canary area stain | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | irradiated range | 06/12/07 | | Onyx razzle old irish cottage | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | Indecent fear-inspiring market pistol | 06/12/07 | | Opaque beta trust fund | 06/12/07 | | Onyx razzle old irish cottage | 06/12/07 | | exciting home toaster | 06/12/07 | | Spruce Bearded National Security Agency | 06/12/07 | | startling mind-boggling coldplay fan | 06/12/07 | | shivering mediation | 06/12/07 | | thriller headpube | 06/12/07 | | appetizing canary area stain | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | Startled brunch | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Startled brunch | 06/12/07 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | appetizing canary area stain | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Filthy puce pervert | 06/12/07 | | burgundy slap-happy chapel tank | 06/12/07 | | Excitant public bath | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | pearl space | 06/12/07 | | appetizing canary area stain | 06/12/07 | | Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit | 09/07/08 | | Violet stirring office | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Multi-colored antidepressant drug | 06/12/07 | | Hideous piazza | 06/12/07 | | exciting home toaster | 06/12/07 | | Idiotic hissy fit | 06/12/07 | | Avocado library | 09/10/08 | | Bonkers rigor | 06/12/07 | | Aphrodisiac national | 06/12/07 | | overrated theater | 06/12/07 | | appetizing canary area stain | 06/12/07 | | erotic up-to-no-good locale | 06/12/07 | | Lilac codepig dopamine | 06/12/07 | | Seedy lodge | 06/12/07 | | Emerald den | 06/12/07 | | Infuriating insanely creepy chad location | 06/12/07 | | stimulating heaven | 06/12/07 | | sick mood | 06/12/07 | | carmine sticky corner half-breed | 06/12/07 | | Cracking roommate point | 06/12/07 | | Marvelous Twisted Box Office Cuckold | 06/12/07 | | erotic up-to-no-good locale | 06/12/07 | | Lime step-uncle's house | 06/12/07 | | khaki hominid | 06/12/07 | | Spectacular gunner institution | 06/12/07 | | Frisky locus dragon | 06/12/07 | | glittery knife | 06/12/07 | | Zippy Thirsty Casino | 06/12/07 | | alcoholic | 06/12/07 | | Gay anal quadroon | 06/12/07 | | alcoholic | 06/12/07 | | Plum comical french chef | 06/12/07 | | razzle-dazzle bistre mental disorder | 06/13/07 | | Deep Trip Stock Car | 06/14/07 | | turquoise 180 internal respiration | 06/19/07 | | azn | 06/19/07 | | chocolate embarrassed to the bone candlestick maker | 08/03/07 | | Fantasy-prone | 08/04/07 | | Fantasy-prone | 08/04/07 | | flushed | 08/28/07 | | crimson garrison kitty | 08/28/07 | | crimson garrison kitty | 08/28/07 | | Cerise factory reset button tattoo | 09/03/07 | | crimson garrison kitty | 11/04/07 | | Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit | 09/07/08 | | Arousing Corn Cake | 09/07/08 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:38 PM Author: lake rambunctious church building Subject: Notice of lawsuit pending vs. certain AutoAdmit posters
To the defendants listed below, you are being sued in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The defendants are the persons using the following pseudonyms on the website autoadmit.com or xoxohth.com: Pauliewalnuts; neoprag; STANFORDtroll; :D; :D (Hillary v. Jeb’08); MoreDoughHi; Remember when I said I would kill you last? I lied; lkjhgf; yalelaw; Spanky; ylsdooder; Community Norm; HI; David Carr (Glass of water for Mr. Grainger); vincimus; Beach Body Brady; Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey; Todd Christopher; A horse walks into a bar (saving one CPGWBT at a time); The Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rollah; DRACULA; Sleazy Z; Whamo (Let me lay it on the line, he had two on the vine); Ari Gold; Ugly Women; playboytroll; Get_to_da_choppa; Dean_Harold_Koh. The allegations are as follows: copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 501; appropriation of another’s name or likeness; unreasonable publicity given to another’s life; publicity that places another in a false light before the public; intentional infliction of emotional distress; negligent infliction of emotional distress; and defamation.
The plaintiffs are attempting to serve you with a complaint and summons in a civil action. The text of the summons appears below. So that we may deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to you, please provide your complete contact information to the following email address: drosenlaw@gmail.com.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NUMBER: 307CV00909 CFD
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
DOE I, and DOE II
v.
DEFENDANTS
Anthony Ciolli; Individuals, whose true names are unknown, using the following pseudonyms: Pauliewalnuts; neoprag; STANFORDtroll; :D; :D (Hillary v. Jeb’08); MoreDoughHi; Remember when I said I would kill you last? I lied; lkjhgf; yalelaw; Spanky; ylsdooder; Community Norm; HI; David Carr (Glass of water for Mr. Grainger); vincimus; Beach Body Brady; Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey; Todd Christopher; A horse walks into a bar (saving one CPGWBT at a time); The Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rollah; DRACULA; Sleazy Z; Whamo (Let me lay it on the line, he had two on the vine); Ari Gold; Ugly Women; playboytroll; Get_to_da_choppa; Dean_Harold_Koh
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY
David N. Rosen, Esq.
David Rosen & Associates, P.C.
400 Orange Street, New Haven, CT 06511
an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within twenty days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable period of time after service.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243886)
|
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:45 PM Author: Emerald den
THIS SEEMS LEGIT.
This case isn't in pacer, yet. https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl
The case no., however, is too accurate to be flame. The highest case no. in PACER is 3:07-cv-00902, for a case filed on 6/8. That makes a new case with 909 a possibility. No flame would be so meticulous as to get the case number right.
The supposed judge on this case (last three letters of case no.) is http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/droney.htm . The defendants might want to call his clerk to see if this case exists. Edit: or better yet call the courthouse so as not to overwhelm his clerk. He seems to be in the Hartford Courthouse http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/htfd.htm .
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243905) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:00 PM Author: Ruddy goyim parlour
he's listed here:
051235 A DAVID N. ROSEN
(Admitted: 09/23/1969) DAVID ROSEN &
ASSOCIATES,P.C.
400 ORANGE ST
NEW HAVEN, CT 06511
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243979) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:51 AM Author: Filthy puce pervert Subject: This post, 7 minutes after OP by another unknown poster,
practically shouts flame
"THIS SEEMS LEGIT.
This case isn't in pacer, yet. https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl
The case no., however, is too accurate to be flame. The highest case no. in PACER is 3:07-cv-00902, for a case filed on 6/8. That makes a new case with 909 a possibility. No flame would be so meticulous as to get the case number right.
The supposed judge on this case (last three letters of case no.) is http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/droney.htm . The defendants might want to call his clerk to see if this case exists. Edit: or better yet call the courthouse so as not to overwhelm his clerk. He seems to be in the Hartford Courthouse http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/htfd.htm ."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245617)
|
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:04 PM Author: Hideous piazza
"drosenlaw@gmail.com"
LOL!
Solo working from bedroom?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244677) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:41 PM Author: curious principal's office
pwned.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243897) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:48 PM Author: angry ticket booth psychic
hi guys! what's going on in this thread?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243919) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:48 PM Author: Ruddy goyim parlour
uh, btw, this is real. just verified. summons w/o complaint and using expedient service. wow. this is certainly interesting.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243921) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:50 PM Author: Idiotic hissy fit
what's happening?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243924) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:50 PM Author: Boyish navy property dog poop
Really good flame.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243926) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:50 PM Author: Territorial at-the-ready death wish
Is this like an evite?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243929) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:53 PM Author: Bateful brilliant hairy legs brethren
Did he really just ask posters "Help me serve you so that I can sue you in court?" What a ttt attorney (to go along w/ his ttt personality & sense of humor).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243936) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 8:53 PM Author: coral passionate stead place of business
wheeeee!!!!!
edit: what a dumb fuck. doesnt he realize that email tags are NOT part of the moniker???? jesus fucking christ
edit: where is his attorney ID #?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243937) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:00 PM Author: hilarious faggot firefighter
:D just shit a brick
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243977) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:01 PM Author: slippery shrine
12(b)(2)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243981) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:29 PM Author: pontificating yapping menage
Some of the posters in that list likely have domicile or presence in CT, and a weak but plausible argument could be made for minimum contacts.
Bottom 25% by any chance?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244153) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 10:25 AM Author: cerebral halford
Did you all fail civ pro? D. Conn. really went out there and had a case that held that a website was sufficient for minimum contacts. Not directly on point, but it is in every civ pro book.
Inset Systems, Inc. v. Instruction Set, Inc., 937 F. Supp. 161 (D. Conn. 1996) Sustaining exercise of jurisdiction over defendant where defendant's only contacts with Connecticut were an Internet web site and an 800 telephone number, both of which advertised defendant's services. The web site and 800 number were accessible to anyone with Internet access or a telephone including Connecticut residents.
Not sure if it is still good law, but it is in D. Conn. right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246193)
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:07 PM Author: Spectacular gunner institution
the defendants knew HI was in Connecticut when they posted their defamatory remarks. personaljurisdictionpwn3d.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246459)
|
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:10 PM Author: coral passionate stead place of business
http://www.ssbb.com/yesjuris.html
for some examples. You are torting someone in CT, they are feeling the brunt of it there, something like that
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244037) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:21 PM Author: Spectacular gunner institution
"The fact that it was read by someone in CT is not enough. This is basic 1L shit."
If that was the only "fact" you'd be right. It's not, and you're not.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246496)
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:01 PM Author: adventurous low-t feces
don't forget AK247
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243987) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:04 PM Author: slippery shrine
what if they changed their monikers and then dismissed for mootness
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244008) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:09 PM Author: concupiscible resort
Cherminsky said anonymous speech was protected today. Of course he also threw in some shit about state action in there, but fuck that, I'll cite whatever I want to cite.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244036) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:12 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
Did you catch the part where he said that the first amendment applies only to the government, not to private parties? Or about how defamatory speech is not protected?
Two issues blown in a single sentence. Good luck on the NY bar.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245381) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 8:52 AM Author: concupiscible resort
1. I said it requires state action so no shit that means it only applies to the gov
2. why are assuming there was defamatory speech?
3. and just in case you were actually serious or thought I was you are a MOTHERFUCKIN RETARD. I was being sarcastic you tard or did you miss the part about "I'll cite whatever I wan to cite."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246101) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:13 PM Author: coral passionate stead place of business
Who else thinks this is the most dangerous type of lawyer possible for our xoxo heroes? assume he will have some internet whizzes in his corner..
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244051) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:14 PM Author: Hideous piazza
"THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. I'm sure Rosen has printouts of every post."
You think he electronically edited things in an HTML editor or Adobe Acrobat first to give himself a better case?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244720) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:15 PM Author: slippery shrine
e-mail your contact info to DROSEN@GMAIL!!! that sounds legit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244065) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:17 PM Author: Lilac codepig dopamine
Why wasn't rach listed as a Def?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244077) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:19 PM Author: Ruddy goyim parlour
well, if this is flame, it's REALLY fucking good flame.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244085) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:21 PM Author: vigorous selfie station
Those girls in the WAPO article?!
I'm guessing, can this actually work?
If it can, why didn't someone like Allison Stokke sue already?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244100) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:26 PM Author: vigorous selfie station
Is there any precedent for this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244127)
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:23 PM Author: ungodly meetinghouse weed whacker
@gmail???
lulz.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244111) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:11 PM Author: Hideous piazza
Doesn't that violate the Gmail Terms of Use?
http://www.google.com/mail/help/terms_of_use.html
"Personal Use. The Service is made available to you for your personal use only."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244706) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:24 PM Author: Floppy forum sneaky criminal
nice.
get his email shut down
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244772) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:24 PM Author: massive nibblets
If my other moniker is listed in there, even if I haven't done anything anywhere close to wrong or illegal (even by IRL standards), should I just stop posting here? I honestly don't know how they could get a hold of me...I'm thinking I'll just go on the lam.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244115) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:24 PM Author: startling mind-boggling coldplay fan
so, service by clicking on xoxo thread -- might this be the new tubgirl?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244116) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:25 PM Author: Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit
lol, the law board is finally going to get its comeuppance.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244120) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:31 PM Author: Lilac codepig dopamine
Right. He can just sue John Doe, AKA ...
That's what he has done. He can then use the law suit to discover other's identities. Until he serves each individual poster, though, I doubt this counts as proper service.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244165) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:34 PM Author: Lilac codepig dopamine
Right. But that meanst he service is defective as to the other posters.
Right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244179) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:27 PM Author: coral passionate stead place of business
I keep waiting for hte op's moniker to switch to pwn3d
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244134) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:27 PM Author: Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit
How fitting that Paulie Walnuts is listed first. And I'll bet :D is right now crying in a corner.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244135) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:28 PM Author: vigorous selfie station
I bet everyone except Ciolli is putting their hard drives in microwaves frying them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244137) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:28 PM Author: hairraiser hell
k
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244139) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:29 PM Author: massive nibblets
We are what we don't see
Missed everything daydreaming
[Chorus]
Flames to dust
Lovers to friends
Why do all good things come to an end
Flames to dust
Lovers to friends
Why do all good things come to an end
come to an end come to an
Why do all good things come to end?
come to an end come to an
Why do all good things come to an end?
Traveling I only stop at exits
Wondering if I'll stay
Young and restless
Living this way I stress less
I want to pull away when the dream dies
The pain sets in and I don't cry
I only feel gravity and I wonder why
Flames to dust
Lovers to friends
Why do all good things come to an end
Flames to dust
Lovers to friends
Why do all good things come to an end
come to an end come to an
Why do all good things come to end?
come to an end come to an
Why do all good things come to an end?
Well the dogs were whistling a new tune
Barking at the new moon
Hoping it would come soon so that they could
Dogs were whistling a new tune
Barking at the new moon
Hoping it would come soon so that they could
Die die die die die
Flames to dust
Lovers to friends
Why do all good things come to an end
Flames to dust
Lovers to friends
Why do all good things come to an end
come to an end come to an
Why do all good things come to end?
come to an end come to an
Why do all good things come to an end?
Well the dogs were barking at a new moon
Whistling a new tune
Hoping it would come soon
And the sun was wondering if it should stay away for a day til the feeling went away
And the sky was falling on the clouds were dropping and
the rain forgot how to bring salvation
the dogs were barking at the new moon
Whistling a new tune
Hoping it would come soon so that they could die.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244151)
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:30 PM Author: soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams
Don't worry, I'll represent y'all!
Welcome to Legal Aid.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244157) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:42 PM Author: Obsidian diverse parlor
they should represent themselves pro se. They'd be better off than having Madcat represent them.
HMFY this is legal advice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244213) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:30 PM Author: Black sex offender puppy
flame potential : 178
flame as executed: 138
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244158) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:31 PM Author: vigorous selfie station
if it's a flame: 180
if not: dark day for xoxo
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244167) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:43 PM Author: Obsidian diverse parlor
if it's flame: 180
if not flame: 181
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244220) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:32 PM Author: underhanded electric field crotch
Why are the Plaintiffs listed as Does?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244170) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:37 PM Author: vigorous selfie station
The fall of Rome, it began with a dream from the PR board, and ended in flames when some dumbass from YLS decided to post one day.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244188) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:37 PM Author: hairraiser hell
"publicity that places another in a false light before the public"
so if i say some random woman is attractive but she's not i can get sued for that?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244190) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:38 PM Author: massive nibblets
I knew it was bad in high school when I stumbled upon Princeton Review. Noooooooo, I couldn't just look at the fucking rankings...I had to go to the god damn message board...Look what you little bastards have gotten me into!
What are the possible outcomes for this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244199) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:42 PM Author: Zombie-like haunted graveyard
Best post ever.
Seriously, and I've seen posts for years.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244209) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:45 PM Author: soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams
Does this even qualify as "service"? Do the mentioned monikers have any affirmative obligation to release their contact information?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244226) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:48 PM Author: French Rehab
@gmail.com? A Harvard educated attorney would have obtained a domain name...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244248) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:48 AM Author: Misanthropic orchestra pit juggernaut
Commercial isn't personal.
You seem to think "personal" is a word with no meaning. If that's incorrect, tell us what you think "personal" means.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245243) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:07 AM Author: Opaque beta trust fund
I don't think "personal" use = non-commercial use. I think "personal" use = use by yourself and not by some other party.
The reason for this provision is so that the provider can hold whoever agrees to the terms of service to those terms, without an "it wasn't me; it was my brother" excuse.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246110) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:49 PM Author: slippery shrine
i believe United States ex rel. Gerald Mayo v. Satan and His Staff, 54 F.R.D. 282 (1971) can be of some help here!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244259) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:49 PM Author: godawful chrome state
Somehow it is fitting that :D is getting pwned. I just wish AK47 was in that group.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244265) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:52 PM Author: glittery knife
shit. there but for the grace of god, and all that.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244282) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:55 PM Author: concupiscible resort
Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey is a great name for a defendant.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244294) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:35 PM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
*Bows deeply*
*Raises middle finger to D. Rosen*
*roflz*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244842) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:57 PM Author: startling mind-boggling coldplay fan
Just e-mailed Brian Leiter's work addy and phone number to this d00d.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244304) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 9:58 PM Author: maroon galvanic party of the first part karate
Luckily I have no money or reputation. I'm giddy over meeting my cheerful big titted accuser in court. TYTY!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244312) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:02 PM Author: soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams
Here's hoping they put a lien on your inheritance.
That is, on whatever's left after you are ESTATETAXPWN3D by the new Clinton Administration!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244338) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:02 PM Author: underhanded electric field crotch
What are the going hourly rates for a recent Quinnipiac law grad?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244340) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:03 PM Author: cordovan lay
What's the worst that can happen in a situation like this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244343) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:07 PM Author: maroon galvanic party of the first part karate
Legal fees: $100K
Judgment: $100k
You still have $150K.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244367) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:05 PM Author: Claret Contagious Faggotry Indian Lodge
174
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244357) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:06 PM Author: Emerald den
Ironic that aznazn isn't a defendant?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244365) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:06 PM Author: massive nibblets
RyanGA (or whatever his name was) fucking killed a girl, and we get this??? Seems unfair!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244366) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:21 PM Author: Spruce Bearded National Security Agency
Visit AboutUs.org for more information about DAVIDROSENLAW.COM
Registrant:
Rosen, David
400 ORANGE ST
NEW HAVEN, CT 06511-6405
US
Domain Name: DAVIDROSENLAW.COM
Administrative Contact:
Rosen, David david.rosen@yale.edu
400 ORANGE ST
NEW HAVEN, CT 06511-6405
US
203-787-3513
Technical Contact:
Network Solutions, LLC. customerservice@networksolutions.com
13861 Sunrise Valley Drive
Herndon, VA 20171
US
1-888-642-9675 fax: 571-434-4620
Record expires on 06-Sep-2012.
Record created on 06-Sep-2001.
Database last updated on 11-Jun-2007 22:20:26 EDT.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS75.WORLDNIC.COM 205.178.190.38
NS76.WORLDNIC.COM 205.178.189.38
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244443) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:21 PM Author: beady-eyed judgmental native
The fact that there is a debate over whether this is real or not indicates it is not proper service. You can't post and official document into a message board known for made up schticks, and expect it to be considered seriously. It would end parody.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244446) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:34 PM Author: soul-stirring rusted prole laser beams
To the defendant listed below, you are being sued in the United States District Court for the District of Uranus. The defendant is the person using the following pseudonym on the website autoadmit.com or xoxohth.com: . . . . . .
The allegations are as follows: annoying the FUCK outta me.
I'll see you in court, BE-AYCH!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244509) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:42 PM Author: massive nibblets
"names associated with each moniker"
Is there really hard evidence for this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244563) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:38 PM Author: flesh whorehouse giraffe
anyone who thinks this is proper service is going to have a tough time on the bar exam...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244532) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:45 PM Author: flesh whorehouse giraffe
and you, sir, are giving legal advice by advising people not to advise people not to give legal advice.
disclaimer: this is not meant to be legal advice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244574) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:44 PM Author: Ruddy goyim parlour
lol. for NY, look up CPLR 308(5):
"Personal service upon a natural person shall be made by any of the following methods: . . .
(5) in such manner as the court, upon motion *without* notice, directs, if service is impracticable [using standard methods] . . . ."
All you have to do then is satisfy due process. Defendants directed their tortious activity to CT b/c they knew HI was there. Then look at burden on plaintiff and defendant. The end. HTH.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244568) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:09 PM Author: flesh whorehouse giraffe
even if it were a proper method of service, the form is incorrect. there is no statement of the relief sought.
legal issues aside, the post clearly states "we are *trying to serve you*..." and also conviently asks defendants to please forward their addresses so they can be served a complaint. if this were actually valid service no litigator would ask for an address to serve the complaint to. he would wait until the defendant responded by serving a demand for a complaint or a notice of appearance. after all, he wants the defendant to default.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244700) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:01 PM Author: beady-eyed judgmental native
Well there is an argument here. This is Mullane notice issue
MULLANE v. CENTRAL HANOVER TR. CO., 339 U.S. 306 (1950). Give it a read. There is some dicta that could be friendly to the plaintiff.
Edit: Not saying that this is good service or notice; it isn't. But there at least a colorable (barely) argument that it is.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244669) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:46 PM Author: massive nibblets
THIS IS FLAME!
I anonymously (and from a publicly used computer) e-mailed his Yale e-mail. Here is my response:
"I will be out of the office until June 19. I will have intermittent access to email. If you wish to reach our office by email, you may write sadkins@davidrosenlaw.com"
There are e-mail accounts set up at davidrosenlaw.com.
I feel this is fairly conclusive!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244581) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:48 PM Author: cordovan lay
If true, this is the best flame ever created.
180, 45, 800, 2400
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244594) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:52 PM Author: massive nibblets
G-mail addy is xoxoposter, password is autoadmit
look for yourself.
Also, the auto-reply is from drosen@davidrosenlaw.com
I think we might be in the clear?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244616) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:00 PM Author: massive nibblets
Ok, listen. I sent his Yale account (which I guess re-directs to his davidrosenlaw.com account right now) an email from a completely anonymous g-mail account. this account is xoxoposter@gmail. com
Go to gmail, type in xoxoposter in the username, and autoadmit in the password, and you will see his auto-response which completely proves that this is the most elaborate and amazing flame in the history of xoxohth
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244661) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:21 PM Author: massive nibblets
It was originally to just e-mail him and hopefully get a response (I wasn't originally going to share the e-mail). I got an autoresponse from an email address that ended with @davidrosenlaw.com
Why would he have us e-mail a free gmail account over something like this when his law firm has a domain of its own that is much more legit?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244759) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:14 PM Author: massive nibblets
You're fucking right. I just got back to my home computer and can't access it for some reason. I swear this is right, and if anyone else e-mails his Yale e-mail, this is what they will get. I really have no reason to lie.
Edit: NM, I'm sure someone logged on and changed the password.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244722) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 10:34 AM Author: cerebral halford
Based on the history of this board, would you list any email you actually used on it?
gmail is still plausible.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246217)
|
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:21 PM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
could be that he wants people to write to his gmail since he's on vacation
?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244753) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 10:47 PM Author: shimmering fragrant stage
shocker that this guy is a dirty Jew.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244589) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:09 PM Author: Rough-skinned set boltzmann
I thought service is OK if judge allows it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244696) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:15 PM Author: Stubborn spot
And a judge approved this why?
Oh and BTW, accepting pro-bono clients for the living fuck of it. anon6356@yahoo.com if you are actually worried about this.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244725) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:21 PM Author: Emerald den
Are you licensed in CT and admitted to that court? Even if you're not you might be able to get Pro-Hac Vice.
THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244758) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:25 PM Author: Stubborn spot
I AM NOT YOUR ATTORNEY. THIS POST HAS NOT CREATED AN ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. PLEASE EMAIL WITH OTHER INQUIRES.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244786) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:11 PM Author: shivering mediation
What's the theory behind the copyright infringement claim?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244703) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:13 PM Author: amber effete tanning salon
lol
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244716) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:24 PM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
you might be reaching. it's possible he listed his gmail account for whatever reason.
i wouldn't be shocked if this were flame, but right now i kinda think it's real.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244777) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:31 PM Author: dashing charcoal famous landscape painting
i actually would be shocked at the mind-blowing quality if this were flame. it would take amazing attention to detail to feign ignorance of board format and include the email tag line in the moniker, and as someone else pointed out on atl it's a sequential case number.
right now, i think i feel like the good germans when the nuremberg trials started.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244819) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:36 PM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
if you're a troll/regular, would you even think to include the taglines? would you be smart enough to make it seem legitimate (i.e., make yourself seem ignorant of board convention) by including :D twice, once with tagline and once without, as if he were two different posters?
maybe. there has been some good flame in the past. but that, combined with the quality of the thing in general, makes me think it's real.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244845) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:47 PM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
first, why don't we avoid calling her a whore from now on?
these are the claims:
"copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 501; appropriation of another’s name or likeness; unreasonable publicity given to another’s life; publicity that places another in a false light before the public; intentional infliction of emotional distress; negligent infliction of emotional distress; and defamation."
i don't know enough about the law or the facts to know whether any of them are valid. can anyone take a stab, for instance, at the "unreasonable publicity given to another's life"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244894) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:52 PM Author: Violet stirring office
So now the internet is the 'public'?
Those are all loaded concepts that are being thrown around. Such cases are notoriously hard to prove.
I have a hard time believing this is real.
Xoxo is a microcosm of the internet. Anonymously authored bile with great information.
If Xoxo goes down, the internet goes down.
Edit: I don't care if you-know-who doesn't like being called a whore. It's my fucking right.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244925) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:50 PM Author: dashing charcoal famous landscape painting
not only that but this post http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8243905 makes it seem like they got the case number right as well, and assigned it to a ct district court judge.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244913)
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:16 PM Author: underhanded electric field crotch
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244731) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:30 PM Author: Ocher trump supporter school cafeteria
Nice, and it only took ~290 posts.
Seems some of our regs are pretty nervous about all of this
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244809) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:21 PM Author: Hideous piazza
Who will be the first to tubgirl Rosen via e-mail?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244757) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:35 PM Author: Deep Trip Stock Car
Now this takes it to the next level.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244839) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:40 PM Author: Vengeful pink macaca
Wow. Amazing that an impromptu beauty contest caused all this shit to roll down hill.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244863) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:49 PM Author: Onyx razzle old irish cottage
It's going to be kindof amusing when someone has to explain to the judge that the there are about 3 people behind all those usernames.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244909) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:51 PM Author: bipolar sound barrier
If this is real, do you suppose whoever had to type that got through the list of monikers without laughing?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244918) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:52 PM Author: topaz sadistic sanctuary athletic conference
one of the more amusing flames i've seen in a while.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244919) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:54 PM Author: Onyx razzle old irish cottage
Sorry to double post. But if you guys are seriously worried about this, maybe you should contact Charlie Nesson. He seemed pretty supportive of GTO - maybe he would find the case cool.
Dershowitz is another possibility, but he's more of an appellate litigator IIRC.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244933) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:55 PM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
What is the "complaint" referred to here? Whoever concocted this is a terrible lawyer. hth!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244935) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:55 PM Author: Lime step-uncle's house
i would like to see the trial. "your honor, the prosecution calls 'a white girl sucking on an asian penis forever' to the stand."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244939) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:55 PM Author: Provocative Azure Theater Stage
I have trouble believing this is flame. Wouldn't the OP be opening himself up to some issues with David Rosen?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244940)
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:02 AM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
good point as well
(not legal advice, of course)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244981) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:08 AM Author: Ocher trump supporter school cafeteria
the answer to every question is WGWAG
priceless, i would laugh if I were there
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245016) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:59 PM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Dear Sir/Madam:
I will only accept service conducted in conformance with the Hague Convention. Please contact the US embassy in Warsaw for further details, and ask them to perfect service on me at the address below:
Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey
Rondo Onz 1, 00-124
Warszawa, Poland
tyia.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244964) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:59 PM Author: Hideous piazza
MOM! MOM! THIS ISN'T RIGHT!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244965) |
Date: June 11th, 2007 11:59 PM Author: vigorous selfie station
If this is no flame, all the defendants should go to the ACLU, that's your best bet, and it's free too.
I mean they defended the KKK, why wouldn't they defend internet free speech?
If you're in New York go to this website:
http://www.nyclu.org/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8244967) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:49 PM Author: Spectacular gunner institution
The EFF would be a better resource I would think.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246563)
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:12 AM Author: heady stage
Executive summary, please.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245037) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:21 AM Author: exhilarant dingle berry pozpig
Well, at least we'll be able to see which monikers were actually pensive.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245077) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:24 AM Author: massive nibblets
This is very Cho-esque
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245100) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:31 AM Author: Big Address Round Eye
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245150) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:40 AM Author: Talented temple affirmative action
flame. duh you faggots
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245202) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:14 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
This is some of the saddest civ pro discussion I've seen yet.
There is no question that the longarm statute will give personal J over the parties. DUH. No brainer.
The issue here is VENUE dammit! VENUE!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245396) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:17 AM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
how are minimum contacts met?
(please be gentle)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245415) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:32 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Hypo: CESM resident of WY looks up a phone number in FL. Calls said number. Calls person a major league asshole, various other horrifying insults.
Your analysis: Recipient of phone call has cause of action against CESM, PJ satisfied?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245508) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:37 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Well, that would all be decided via 12b6 or the state analogue. The issue is whether PJ exists. Your answer is "yes."
ergo, u = retarded.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245533) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:43 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
If it's not a tort there's no PJ. So the answer is NO.
You do realize that there has to be a TORT involved, right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245576) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:45 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Call it IIED. Imagine something truly horrible was said that induced a stroke.
Still, there's no PJ, nice guy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245588) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:03 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Or find a case, any case, that says intentional tort = PJ.
It just doesn't exist friend. Sorry.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245684) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:08 AM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
i don't think that's supported by caselaw. the calder "aiming" requirement might only be satisfied by situations with calder-like facts.
sorry for the long post, but here's language from Wilson v. Belin, 20 F.3d 644 (5th cir. 1994) suggesting just that:
"Wilson first argues that the district court had specific personal jurisdiction over Blakey and Belin because each of them spoke with a Texas newspaper reporter and thus reasonably could foresee that their defamatory comments would be published in Texas and injure Wilson's reputation in Texas. Wilson argues that Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 789, 104 S.Ct. 1482, 1487, 79 L.Ed.2d 804 (1984) clearly stands for the proposition that whenever the effects of libel by a nonresident are felt in the forum state, specific jurisdiction exists. We believe Wilson reads Calder too broadly.FN4
FN4. We also note that First Amendment considerations regarding the defendants' abilities to inject their respective opinions into the marketplace of ideas on a topic of obvious public concern are not relevant to our wholly jurisdictional inquiry. Calder, 465 U.S. at 790-91, 104 S.Ct. at 1487-88.
In Calder, 465 U.S. at 788-90, 104 S.Ct. at 1486-87, a reporter for a Florida publication researched a story in California, wrote a story about a California resident whose career was centered in California, and provided that story to his (the defendant reporter's) employer, which had a substantial portion of its national circulation in California. The Court stated that the defendants' (the reporter's and his editor's) “actions were expressly aimed at California” because they wrote and edited “an article that they knew would have a potentially devastating impact upon [the plaintiff in California].” Id. at 789, 104 S.Ct. at 1487. In the instant case, however, neither Blakey nor Belin did any preparation for a story to defame the plaintiff. They did not even write or devise a story. They did no research regarding Wilson's theory in Texas or elsewhere. Furthermore, there is no indication that these defendants were paid for their comments, that their comments were part of a planned business venture, or that such unsolicited comments served any role in advancing their business careers. Finally, the plaintiff, Wilson, is not a Texas resident and his career is not centered there. Thus, the dispositive facts in Calder simply are absent from this case.
Wilson also places great weight on the premise that a libelous tort is deemed to have occurred where the offending material is circulated. See Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 465 U.S. 770, 777, 104 S.Ct. 1473, 1479, 79 L.Ed.2d 790 (1984) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 577A, Comment a (1977)). This principle alone, however, will not win the day for Wilson. That the tort is deemed to have occurred in whole or in part in Texas is simply not dispositive of whether jurisdiction is appropriate. See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 288-89, 100 S.Ct. 559, 562-63, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980) (holding that although tort occurred in Oklahoma, New York defendant was not subject to personal jurisdiction in Oklahoma by nonresident plaintiff).
____________________
it's just one case but it goes HARD the other way.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245701) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:46 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
Now please go away little man.
Calder v. Jones
The allegedly libelous story concerned the California activities of a California resident. It impugned the professionalism of an entertainer whose television career was centered in California.[Footnote 9] The article was drawn from California sources,
Page 465 U.S. 783, 789
and the brunt of the harm, in terms both of respondent's emotional distress and the injury to her professional reputation, was suffered in California. In sum, California is the focal point both of the story and of the harm suffered. Jurisdiction over petitioners is therefore proper in California based on the "effects" of their Florida conduct in California. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297-298 (1980); Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws 37 (1971).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245595) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:56 AM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
NLA
that seems right
"Court held in Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 465 U.S. 770 (1984), that jurisdiction would also be found even where the party injured by the libelous assertion was not a resident of the state where the lawsuit was brought."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calder_v._Jones#Other_developments
NLA
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245654) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:41 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
Well the letter was sent to the Yale LS faculty and she goes there, I would say the greatest impact was suffered in CT, do you disagree?
Actually, that wouldn't even matter since it was sent to CT on purpose.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245562) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:21 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Heard of Int'l Shoe, dude? A state can't just say, "we have PJ over every citizen of earth," and leave Ds to argue venue.
Ding!^10
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245434) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:26 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
When you PURPOSEFULLY direct your activity toward another state and the effects are felt there, guess what? Minimim contacts are satisfied. O rly? Rly.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245468) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:30 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
LOL Any civ pro book, hornbook, outline, set of flash cards, hell anything just type in google fer fucks sake.
This is civ pro for high school kids.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245499) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:34 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
No. Your looking at "purposefully targeted" in terms of business etc. Not the posting of message boards hosted in PA via the interwebs.
hth.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245514) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:51 AM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
NOT LEGAL ADVICE
that her pic is on the internet will relate to different legal claims (invasion of privacy, including "appropriation of another’s name or likeness; unreasonable publicity given to another’s life; publicity that places another in a false light before the public" as in the OP)
we're just talking about straight up defamation. all that requires is: (1) defamatory language (not including opinion, unless it is based on specific facts), (2) of or conerning the plaintiff, (3) publication of language by defendant to 3rd person, and (4) damage to plaintiff's reputation. note that under (4), general damages are presumed in a libel action, so she doesn't have to make out specific damages.
if i had to guess, all of these will probably bet met by at least some posts on here.
there are defenses: (1) consent and (2) truth would be the only ones possibly relevant here.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE
this is NOT the same issue as whether connecticut has personal jurisdiction over the defendants.
there are also the issues surrounding intentional infliction of emotional distress.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245615) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:43 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
I'm going to stop insulting you, b/c you seem nice. Sorry.
But your legal analysis is terrible. Do you find your law profs always telling you "you're not seeing the issue?"
Here the issues are two: 1) PJ 2) Service. Neither of these exists, but even if service could be effected, PJ wouldn't exist for 9/10 of the Ds.
hth.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245579) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:48 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
Calder v Jones
The allegedly libelous story concerned the California activities of a California resident. It impugned the professionalism of an entertainer whose television career was centered in California.[Footnote 9] The article was drawn from California sources,
Page 465 U.S. 783, 789
and the brunt of the harm, in terms both of respondent's emotional distress and the injury to her professional reputation, was suffered in California. In sum, California is the focal point both of the story and of the harm suffered. Jurisdiction over petitioners is therefore proper in California based on the "effects" of their Florida conduct in California. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297-298 (1980); Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws 37 (1971).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245602) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:55 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
"[P} brought suit in California Superior Court, claiming that she had been libeled in an article written and edited by petitioners in Florida and published in the National Enquirer, a national magazine having its largest circulation in California."
The issue is minimum contacts, dude. Sorry. The [D] Enquirer had them in CA in Calder by selling 1 million copies/week there; xoxo posters don't have them in CT.
Thread closed.
hth.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245645) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:01 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
Oooo so I guess you win since you said that you win.
Where does the opinion state the minimum number of copies needed to meet the threshhold? It doesn't. You are taking a detail from the facts and readining into the rule. BAD law student. NAUGHTY NAUGHTY!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245676) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:11 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Read the post above quoting the 5th Cir.
ur wrong, friend.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245713) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:52 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
This COULD be valid service because if P can find no other feasible way to serve D, the court can approve some other method at its discretion. If publishing in a newspaper is ok, I don't see a due process violation in posting the notice where the D's are KNOWN to visit.
Of course, in practice the P would subpoena for their IP addresses and (if they could get them) would then subpoena their ISP's for their names and addresses, but it is conceivable that this could be valid service if the IP addresses could not be obtained.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245626) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:59 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Sorry; no. You're saying that the sufficiency of service depends on whether the judge _thinks_ it's sufficient?
There IS law out there, you know, we can't just make up whatever the fuck we want.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245669) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:08 AM Author: green laughsome theatre potus
No. The Supreme Court determines whether it is sufficient.
The judge can make up a way for the party to serve on the other if no practical means can be found, provided that the method of service ordered by the court isn't in violation of due process.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245703) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:23 AM Author: Filthy puce pervert
First the issue is improper service. We recently covered this in barbri, how is no one here to mention it? This is NOT proper service, this is not a form of service a judge can even rule acceptable and there is no jurisdiction without proper service.
What did our barbri prof say? If they send you improper service and ask you to accept, DO NOT DO IT, DO NOT HELP THE OPPOSING PARTIES' LAWYERS
oh, and this is flame. I am just testing my barbri skillz.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245450) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:16 AM Author: erotic up-to-no-good locale
*EVERYBODY DANCE NOW*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245411) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:25 AM Author: exciting home toaster
sadly, an LSD poster accomplished what nearly 400 posts here couldn't:
its either a flame or the guy has a bad lawyer
1. the service process is invalid under frcp 4.
2. this is a state tort action filed in a federal court. since defendants addresses are unknown, if even one ends up being from connecticut, diversity is destroyed. in addition, the amount demanded must be on the complaint, and must be over $75000
3. out-of-state defendants get 30 days to file an answer, not 20, so the complaint is invalid on its face.
4. the proper way to pursue this suit would be to sue xoxo (or, if not incorporated, the owner) directly. serve discovery papers to obtain all of those user's ip addresses and physical addresses for service. use frcp joinder rule (17 i think) to add only those defendants who dont destroy diversity.
(and the "this is not legal advice" joke was played out some time ago.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245461) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:27 AM Author: burgundy slap-happy chapel tank
Good points, all.
But D. Rosen must have given his consent to do this. A class project?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245476) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 3:40 AM Author: exciting home toaster
"can't he just join the state law claims to his federal claim and asset pendant jurisdiction"
correct
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245944) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 8:42 AM Author: Spruce Bearded National Security Agency
On 1 and 3, I'm not so sure the details of this service, but isn't this just a demand for an address in order to summons them properly? Then, after he can't get information from some of them, he goes to the court, shows hardship, and gets permission to have public notice of the complaint and demand for an answer?
On 2, you're flatly wrong. He's got a federal question in there, so the state claims are within federal jurisdiction even absent diversity through pendant claims.
On 4, those cases have consistently failed under federal laws protecting domain hosts or Web hosts from liability for the actions of individuals committed on the site.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246090) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:25 AM Author: thriller headpube
He's trying to get people to expedite service. But service isn't executed until a copy of the complaint is served to the defendants. That hasn't happened here.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245465) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:29 AM Author: appetizing canary area stain
MY NEW STANCE: This is complete flame. Until I hear otherwise I will not respond to anything. I will not let it bother me. There is no fucking way this can happen over a message board.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245493) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:31 AM Author: Violet stirring office
I'm with you. Even if this is real, we saw how Trustafarian got PWN3D through honesty.
And what he did is actually legally punishable. This is a joke.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245503) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:35 AM Author: Filthy puce pervert
you shouldn't respond either way. It is improper service. odds are they will never get proper service, as they cannot get the identity of the posters and serve you properly, ie in person or by certified mail to your address or place of work.
And by responding to improper service, you can waive your right to claim improper service later, so for christ's sake, don't do anything.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245520) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:37 AM Author: Violet stirring office
The only way ISP's are giving out select IP's is when they are being slapped with multi-million dollar lawsuits from the mighty, deep-pocketed RIAA. Even this process takes years and years.
David Rosen cannot compel these ISPs into forking over this client info. Can you imagine the precedent that would set? The internet would crumble before our eyes.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245531) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:46 AM Author: Emerald den
"It's not legal advice, it's anonymous internet discussion."
Exactly. You're not even willing to stand by your advice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245593) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:36 AM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
i'm beginning to think this is flame too. or at least a first attempt at service with very shaky legal foundation.
if it's confirmed as real tomorrow, though, what will you do? if i were in your shoes i'd contact the alcu asap. maybe a prof at your school who works in the field (or nesson at hls?). definitely wouldn't email the guy with my name and address.
that's personal advice not legal advice - obviously
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245526) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:40 AM Author: Violet stirring office
This is Leiter's revenge. He's probably having a huge laugh right now with his fat wife while deconstructing these amateur legal arguments.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245553) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:39 AM Author: Multi-colored antidepressant drug
what if, in about 7 hours, this terms out to be real - then what?
i will look back on tonight with nostalgia. see, usually i'm one to believe the worst from the very beginning. i never cling to false hope. here the worst outcome would be that this event, after all the disasters xoxo has survived, will actually be the one to kill the board and ruins the reputations and careers of many posters. objectively speaking, i think there's a good chance of that.
but right now i'm still clinging to the hope that it's brilliant, masterful flame. these are strange feelings for me, a calmness and optimism i've had only brushes with in the past, and i will hold on to them for as long as i can.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245825) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 3:53 AM Author: Hideous piazza
"what if, in about 7 hours, this terms out to be real - then what?"
Hilarity ensues!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245963) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 3:44 AM Author: exciting home toaster
Dispensing with the dumb, unfunny, and unnecessary "this is not legal advice" trope: Obvioulsy no one should ever respond to this kind of solicitation. That's legal advice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8245950) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 4:27 AM Author: Idiotic hissy fit
OH NO, DIARRHEA ALL OVER THE CARPET, WHY DID I INFRINGE COPYRIGHT UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 501 NAKED? THIS ALWAYS HAPPENS.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246005) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 7:37 AM Author: Bonkers rigor
Though I am not giving legal advice, part of me thinks this is flame because they've selected negligent infliction of emotional distress as a cause of action, and because a horse walks into a bar is being listed as a defendant. At least as I understand NIED, the posters' actions couldn't fit this cause of action. Also, AHWIAB says he didn't say anything. If that's actually true, it makes it sound like said flamer just slipped up in picking him. Just my two cents.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246069) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 7:41 AM Author: Aphrodisiac national
lawyers throw easily dismissed claims in all the time.
i googled and i think i found what ahwiab said. the lawyer probably knows that claim is going to fail, but this is what you do as a lawyer. however, if that's really what the claim against ahwiab is based on (a comment about a sundae), then it's borderline Rule 11 sanctionable.
edit: actually, if many of these claims are based on the thread I'm looking at, then I'd say Rule 11 sanctions are likely.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246070) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 8:19 AM Author: appetizing canary area stain
Has anyone called??
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246080) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:03 AM Author: erotic up-to-no-good locale
Case is not in the computer according to the clerk at Hartford.
I call bullshit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246103) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:19 AM Author: Infuriating insanely creepy chad location
rofl. what did get to da choppa ever do?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246123) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:35 AM Author: stimulating heaven
lol
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246140) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 10:30 AM Author: sick mood
What a LULZ.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8246205) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:54 PM Author: carmine sticky corner half-breed
Anyone remember those WGWAG XOXO polo shirts someone got made? They're gonna be law school collectors items. "Check out my Ciolli signed XO polo!"
Selling said shirts would be a decent way to start a defense fund.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8247120) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:57 PM Author: Cracking roommate point
I wonder what Ms. Doe's real LSAT score was. I'm guessing it was kinda shitty - which is why she's so uptight about it - but at least in the 160s.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8247129) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 5:28 PM Author: Marvelous Twisted Box Office Cuckold
How has noone yet posted that the Wall Street Journal is confirming this thing?
From their law blog:
"The complaint asks for judgment against the defendants for unspecified damages as well as punitive damages in the amount of $245,400. Besides Ciolli, named defendants include individuals with pseudonyms such as “Pauliewalnuts” and “The Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rollah.”
“It’s bringing the right to protect yourself against offensive words and images into the 21st century,” said David N. Rosen, a New Haven, Conn.-based attorney for the students and a senior research scholar in law at Yale Law to the Law Blog in an interview. “This is the scummiest kind of sexually offensive tripe,” he said of the postings about the women on AutoAdmit. Rosen is joined by Mark A. Lemley, of counsel at San Francisco litigation boutique Keker & Van Nest and a professor at Stanford Law School who teaches computer and internet law. They are taking the case pro bono. Here [link to this thread], they have posted a notification on the lawsuit on AutoAdmit."
Bad suit, probably. Flame, almost certainly not.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8247726) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 6:19 PM Author: Spectacular gunner institution
rofl
way too late. they got hard copies of every thread they wanted to preserve way before this suit became public.
if they were smart they probably wrote letters to ciolli and any other relevant person expressly instructing them not to destroy evidence. i would expect some sort of a motion to that effect if they cant reach a private agreement.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8247904)
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 6:51 PM Author: Frisky locus dragon
How did they pick which people to sue? It seems like they could have easily doubled the number of defendants.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8248008) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 8:07 PM Author: Plum comical french chef
OMG this is like the CRAZIEST thing i've ever seen i wlii bend time and space to make this CRAZY thing just GO you know man just GO GO GO!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8248290) |
Date: June 14th, 2007 6:21 PM Author: Deep Trip Stock Car
Bump, in case any defendant misses this notice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8255610) |
Date: June 19th, 2007 9:55 PM Author: azn
FLAME
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8275714) |
Date: August 3rd, 2007 2:53 PM Author: chocolate embarrassed to the bone candlestick maker
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8467920) |
Date: August 4th, 2007 7:25 PM Author: Fantasy-prone
"The plaintiffs are attempting to serve you with a complaint and summons in a civil action. The text of the summons appears below. So that we may deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to you, please provide your complete contact information to the following email address: drosenlaw@gmail.com. "
= ROFL.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8473221) |
Date: August 28th, 2007 12:24 AM Author: crimson garrison kitty
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8569057) |
Date: August 28th, 2007 11:01 AM Author: crimson garrison kitty
Is this substituted service? Is this substituted service?
No, faggots.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8570143) |
Date: November 4th, 2007 1:36 PM Author: crimson garrison kitty
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#8851554) |
Date: September 7th, 2008 5:26 PM Author: Vivacious Genital Piercing Pit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#10136139) |
Date: September 7th, 2008 5:30 PM Author: Arousing Corn Cake
Wasn't "Dirty Nigger" one of the defendants?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2#10136148) |
|
|