The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Amended complaint on Concurring Opinions -- Ciolli dropped!
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:12 AM |
 |
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:20 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:21 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:16 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:20 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:20 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:20 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:22 AM azn was added three times, fortunately. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:22 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:22 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:22 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:39 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:29 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:41 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:21 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:24 AM
That's my racist joke for the day. ty.
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:26 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:27 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:48 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:54 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:25 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:26 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:28 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:25 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:29 AM p.53 ROFL. I can't wait for another amended complaint when they sue someone for saying they like applesauce. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:26 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:28 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:31 AM
They dropped the only person they could identify.
It's almost like an xoxo poster is heading this litigation and playing a cruel joke on the Does. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:31 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:33 AM
I would personally hunt down Ciolli if someone did that to me. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:41 AM
In March 2007, pseudonymous poster “Patrick Zeke” sent an email to the Yale Law School Faculty with the subject heading: “Yale Law Faculty concerning pending lawsuit.” The author of the email made false and harmful comments about DOE I, including: “[DOE I] is barely capable of reading (159 LSAT),” and “it seems like the risk of contracting herpes from [DOE I] would convince any rational person to go to a prostitute first.” This defamatory email was then posted as a thread on the AutoAdmit site by pseudonymous poster “lonelyvirgin” with the thread title “new lonelyvirgin e-mail to YLS faculty.” |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:34 PM
I bet this is the kind of thing 4chan would jump on as well, and it's lucky that no one has involved them. Supposedly when they decide to go after someone you have to change your number because you're getting calls the whole night and shit like that. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:33 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:39 AM http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/whats_going_on_1.html
Especially:
I have contacted several sources to try to figure out what is going on. As best as I can ascertain, Mark Lemley and David Rosen have been negotiating with non-party Jarret Cohen over the summer, seeking a settlement that would:
* delete past and prospective threads on Autoadmit about the plaintiffs; * de-index the plaintiffs from Google and other search engines; * require Autoadmit to log IP addresses; * require Autoadmit to create a term of service agreement and a complaint response system.
In return, plaintiffs would dismiss Ciolli, and (I take it) proceed against the pseudonymous defendants alone. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:40 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:41 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:45 AM
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:59 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:42 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:41 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:44 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:01 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:11 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:13 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:12 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:55 PM
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 2:17 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:33 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:35 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:35 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:37 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:45 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:47 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:49 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:50 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:42 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:28 PM
Where are the elements of libel set out? Granted I skimmed this shit in like 5 minutes so maybe I missed that whole thing, but I doubt it. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:58 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:26 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:31 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:35 PM
Also, you've seen 100 complaints and none have cited any authority? That stinks of BS. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:40 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:42 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:45 PM
edit: re-read the discussion, STEVE, re: the restatement. I never said ive never seen a complaint cite authority. I said ive never seen a complaint cite the restatement of torts in the manner suggested by valen2. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 2:00 PM
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:35 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:50 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:53 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:35 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:30 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:11 AM
Seems like people who sent emails are pretty much screwed (deservedly so) unless they were VERY careful in setting up those email accounts.
Good to see AK47 up there as well. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:15 AM
http://randazza.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/anthony-ciolli-dropped-from-auto-admit-lawsuit/ |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:20 AM
how do you see this stuff going forward? |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:31 AM
LULZ. Your attorney is a blatant HES troll. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:40 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:35 AM
I remember a while back you mentioned that if being associated with this site hurt you in the job process, you'd be ok with taht because you wouldn't want to work for such a firm. Glad to see you've come to your senses. I think you should stop posting here entirely though or at least come up with a different moniker. I have faith you'll find a legal job eventually |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:23 PM
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:39 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:41 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 2:19 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:12 AM You've got to think at some point that just because you are justified in saying something, that does not mean you should say it. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:11 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:24 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:31 AM
Also, the people with email addresses linked to their monikers in the complaint are fucked unless they registered and accessed those email addresses using proxies. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:38 AM
getfuckingreal@onlyanidiotwoulduseanactualemailaddress.com |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:43 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:44 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:48 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:52 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:38 AM at first i thought that might have been one of my monikers, back when i tried to quit this shithole. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:37 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:42 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:44 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:44 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:47 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:50 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:53 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:54 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:56 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:57 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 2:47 PM
> and aznaznazn? I'm convinced that they named him purely > because they got so tired of his threads when they were > doing research on the site.
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:53 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:10 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:39 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:50 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:44 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:48 AM
Date: February 12th, 2007 11:29 AM Author: vincimus I can assure you she doesn’t dress conservatively. Anyone who goes to the gym in the afternoon has seen her trapsing around in spandex booty shorts and a strappy tank top. She wants people to look, and they do. Date: February 22nd, 2007 4:31 PM Author: Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey Take your goddamned cell phone next time and snap a pic, for Chrissakes. Then post, oc.
That's a harsh way to get pwn3d. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:39 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:13 PM those are some crazy fuckers |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:51 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:00 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:52 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:57 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:02 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:57 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:02 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:04 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:08 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:12 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:21 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:24 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:41 AM
They are out for blood and pwnage. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:45 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:56 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:58 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:09 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:11 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:21 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:36 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:58 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:23 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:58 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:03 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:04 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:05 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:11 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:15 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:18 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:18 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:27 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:31 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:11 AM
Regardless, as the poster above suggests, it's now fair to say that this has done more harm than good to these girls. That's really why I'm starting to feel bad for them.
At first, they were the brats who complained about being maligned on a message board. I don't feel that way anymore. Now, I feel like their embarassment has been turned into capital for their lawyers, who are engaging in an intellectual staring contest. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:10 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 2:32 PM
And to be honest, at this point they might as well keep going. All the damage to their reputation has already been done. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:08 AM
They seemed to have cleaned up the writing considerably in the amended complaint. Did they realize it was obvious the original complaint was written by the Does and Fertik? |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:09 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:11 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:27 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:14 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:28 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:35 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:36 AM Author: Donald Anselmi
I want to see that guy get PWND. The problem is that they're going to assume anyone who sent a photo in is AK47 unless otherwise shown.
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=#)"
You are an incredible idiot pensive |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 6:24 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:46 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:49 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:50 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:53 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:46 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 11:56 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:07 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:26 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:35 PM
Keker & Van Nest has apparently staffed this case with no less than 5 lawyers, including one partner, one of counsel, and three associates. Plus Professor Rosen. That makes no sense to me whatsoever. Do these lawyers have nothing better to do with their time? The evidence seems to suggest: No they don't.
Just a thought.
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 12:56 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 4:03 AM
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:02 PM
Google news hit on "keker": http://news.google.com/news?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGIH_enUS228US229&q=keker
|
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 4:07 AM
Five lawyers x 20 hours/month each x $300 per hour opportunity cost = it's costing the firm $30,000 per month for this stupid case.
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:32 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:36 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 1:47 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 2:50 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 2:53 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:29 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 4:31 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 6:02 PM
(DOE I & DOE II v. Individuals, whose true names are unknown, using the following pseudonyms: pauliewalnuts; neoprag; STANFORDtroll; :D; lkjhgf; yalelaw; Spanky; ylsdooder; HI; David Carr; vincimus; Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey; A horse walks into a bar; The Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rollah; DRACULA; Sleazy Z; Whamo; Ari Gold; Ugly Women; playboytroll; Dean_Harold_Koh; kr0nz; reminderdood; r@ygold; who is; Joel Schellhammer; Prof. Brian Leiter; hitlerhitlerhitler; lonelyvirgin; Patrick Zeke <patrick8765@hotmail.com>; Patrick Bateman <batemanhls08@hotmail.com>; [DOE I] got a 157 LSAT; azn, azn, azn; Dirty Nigger; leaf; t14 gunner; kibitzer; yalels2009; AK47)
Plaintiffs' counsel requests that individuals who have used, or currently use, the above pseudonyms on this web site provide identifying information and/or the identity of counsel representing them so that plaintiffs' counsel may serve them with the complaint and conduct a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference. Plaintiffs' counsel may be contacted at (415) 391 5400. Please ask for Ashok Ramani or Steve Mitra. In addition, plaintiffs' counsel may also be contacted by email at doelawsuit@kvn.com.
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:05 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:08 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:36 AM
Meanwhile, non-privileged, non-Yale-law-student, ordinary or less-than-ordinary folks with real problems throughout the country lack pro bono support. |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:51 AM |