The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Let's pretend (hypothetically, of course) that I'm a D.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 9th, 2007 7:57 PM |
 |
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:01 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:03 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:05 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:05 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:07 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:10 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:11 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:21 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:13 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:13 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:16 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:19 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:27 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:29 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:36 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:41 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:41 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:43 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:32 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:01 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:42 PM
I'm saying they match your IP to an email that was used to create a moniker here.
There's no reason to think that was you at all, if you were running an open wireless network in law school housing. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:20 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:07 PM
And while you are at it, can you suggest to them that while the amended complaint is a huge improvement with respect to writing style, it still needs work.
For example, they have completely messed up the verb tenses in this sentence:
"That person specifically addressed DOE I’s future classmates, telling them to “watch out for her” when she would begin at Yale Law School in the fall."
This is also the first time I have seen the word "trash" used as a verb in a complaint.
|
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:21 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:11 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:22 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:23 PM
btw, by "further" I mean substantively further, obviously. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:24 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:25 PM
The only miscalculation was at how patient the judge would be with utterly hopeless litigation.
The reason there are no rule 11 sanctions is because nobody sought them. |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:04 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:10 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:11 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:25 AM
Just because Keker is a bit slow right now does not mean that they will just come in and kill folks.
The reason dismissals and rule 11's have not happened is because they have not served anyone with the lawsuit. |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:01 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:19 PM
But they will never be sought in the first place, at least by any defendant that is represented by an actual attorney.
|
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:20 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:26 PM
|
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:22 AM second, while there are some interesting legal questions surrounding the tort claims, the main issue in this case isn't legal, it's technical: how are the Ps going to identify these 30+ defendants? the few involved in the t14 hotties site might be easy to track down, but not the rest. having served as supreme court editor of the yale law journal isn't going to help the lawyers solve this problem. |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:22 AM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:24 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:26 PM |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:27 PM |
|
Date: December 7th, 2007 11:13 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:23 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:31 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:17 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:26 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:26 AM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:21 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:25 PM |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:03 PM |