The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why is it so hard to incorporate AI into Higher Ed ?
| .........,,.,.,.,.,,,,,,.,.,.,.,.,. | 11/29/25 |
| bungulator | 11/29/25 |
| .........,,.,.,.,.,,,,,,.,.,.,.,.,. | 11/29/25 |
| Amateur Millennial Butt Porn | 11/29/25 |
| .........,,.,.,.,.,,,,,,.,.,.,.,.,. | 11/29/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 29th, 2025 1:41 PM People act like AI breaks the whole system. It just changes it, it’s not like every AI paper is an A. You have to be able to refine the outputs with prompts, challenge the reasoning, and adjust tone etc.
Weird that people seem to think ChatGPT works like a calculator but it’s more like an interactive tool that’s not going away.
Columbia panel on AI https://youtu.be/d52_MvN2dtk?si=8_xeY1S0Cj2v_ziZ |
Date: November 29th, 2025 1:44 PM Author: bungulator imo the process of creating it on your own is the whole point, you are learning to learn and build
shitting out 1000 ai prompts is not the same thing and defeats the entire point
obviously higher ed is a pure scam and joke now but there was a time when actually learning and growing was the point and not some piece of paper |
 |
Date: November 29th, 2025 1:49 PM having the ability to challenge your reasoning with a PHD masterman companion should yield stronger arguments and understanding.
I think something where you have to show whatever prompts you used and then have to defend your paper irl could work. But people should be constantly questioning AI outputs and actively checking against actual sources and their own reasoning. |
|
Date: November 29th, 2025 1:50 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn This is confusing me too. It should be incredibly easy to amplify learning and then you just add oral/handwritten exams. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804106&forum_id=2.#49470329) |
|
Date: November 29th, 2025 2:11 PM (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804106&forum_id=2.#49470395) |