Remember in like 1999 when they told women weren’t as “shallow” as men
| kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | grizzly sanctuary electric furnace | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | Chest-beating autistic puppy affirmative action | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | dashing genital piercing stage | 06/13/21 | | Appetizing immigrant turdskin | 06/13/21 | | Chest-beating autistic puppy affirmative action | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | dashing genital piercing stage | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | painfully honest flesh feces | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | dashing genital piercing stage | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | painfully honest flesh feces | 06/13/21 | | Bisexual Heaven People Who Are Hurt | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | kink-friendly legend | 06/13/21 | | startling stag film | 06/13/21 | | Gay Blood Rage | 06/13/21 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 13th, 2021 5:52 PM Author: Chest-beating autistic puppy affirmative action
Ashamed to admit I actually believed this flame. Not only is it not true, it's the opposite and their preferences are shockingly uniform-- let me guess, she likes white guys (and maybe guys of her own race), a full head of hair, tall, and fit. This doesn't work in reverse at all, there's men who like tall gym bunnies, men who like short fatmos, etc. If you're a guy, there's a very slim chance you're any woman's fantasy unless you won the genetic lottery. If you're a woman, then SOMEONE out there is fetishizing whatever attributes you have, although obviously it's easier for some than others. Hence Tinder, every women has a swarm of men, and most men have nothing.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4856299&forum_id=2#42622076) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2021 6:03 PM Author: kink-friendly legend
some of this fetishization is just necessity being the mother of invention (of fetishes). you still have women who omg love beards or who like balds.
with that said, still the point is that phenotype rules the day and anything else is basically just women shrewdly seeking out providers.
also, how many girls actually have a true phase where they love "bad boys" (i.e. scumbags), where it's only a *phase*? like seriously when does it really happen? it's not that they go from the guy in the motorcycle to the guy in a volvo, it's more that they go from wanting the guy with an awesome phenotype who doesn't give a fuck about them to settling for paulie porsche.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4856299&forum_id=2#42622128) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2021 8:14 PM Author: dashing genital piercing stage
A data scientist representing the popular dating app “Hinge” reported on the Gini coefficients he had found in his company’s abundant data, treating “likes” as the equivalent of income. He reported that heterosexual females faced a Gini coefficient of 0.324, while heterosexual males faced a much higher Gini coefficient of 0.542. So neither sex has complete equality: in both cases, there are some “wealthy” people with access to more romantic experiences and some “poor” who have access to few or none. But while the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing. According to the Hinge analyst:
On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average—think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war—think South Africa).
https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4856299&forum_id=2#42622643) |
|
|