Another "Iryna Zarutska" situation developing in Chicago (subway)
| coiffed sandwich | 11/19/25 | | ethereal \\(> ' v ' <)// tp | 11/19/25 | | coiffed sandwich | 11/19/25 | | Lesbian with a Black, disabled, non-binary child | 11/19/25 | | coiffed sandwich | 11/19/25 | | jeevacation@gmail.com | 11/19/25 | | coiffed sandwich | 11/19/25 | | Pilgrims Did Nothing Wrong | 11/19/25 | | AI_concubine | 11/19/25 | | Pilgrims Did Nothing Wrong | 11/19/25 | | hung stud | 11/19/25 | | Raul Mondesi circa 1998 | 11/19/25 | | "'''"'"""''" | 11/19/25 | | Pilgrims Did Nothing Wrong | 11/19/25 | | millennial unc gamer with 400ms reaction time | 11/19/25 | | .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,...., | 11/19/25 | | Megathor lives! | 11/20/25 | | law center death march | 11/19/25 | | ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,. | 11/19/25 | | goy orbison | 11/19/25 | | constantscreen the great | 11/19/25 | | 6-7 | 11/19/25 | | jcm | 11/19/25 | | kenneth play | 11/19/25 | | .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,.,.,:::,...,:,...:..:.,:.::,. | 11/19/25 | | 6-7 | 11/19/25 | | kenneth play | 11/19/25 | | real men wearing real watches | 11/20/25 | | Pilgrims Did Nothing Wrong | 11/20/25 | | coiffed sandwich | 11/20/25 | | kenneth play | 11/20/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 11/19/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 11/19/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:17 PM Author: Pilgrims Did Nothing Wrong (TDNW)
again bystanders too afraid to intervene
sick world the libs have made for us
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800010&forum_id=2!#49444420) |
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:47 PM Author: millennial unc gamer with 400ms reaction time
this stuff only stops when judges start getting killed
nothing else to say about it. no amount of public outrage will ever change anything. but judges getting murdered will change it overnight
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800010&forum_id=2!#49444517) |
 |
Date: November 19th, 2025 11:59 PM
Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,....,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800010&forum_id=2!#49445381) |
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:38 PM
Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.
libs want this to happen to you if you are white. that's just an objective fact supported by long-term evidence. libs, care to refute?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800010&forum_id=2!#49444791) |
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:14 PM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,.,.,:::,...,:,...:..:.,:.::,.
Reed yelled over Judge Laura McNally and said he pleads guilty and will represent himself.
“When you walked in here, I presumed you to be innocent of these charges,” McNally said.
“I’m guilty,” Reed responded.
...
Arrests records indicate Reed has been arrested 71 times and convicted 13 times in Cook County.
...
According to court records, Reed also pleaded guilty to arson in a 2020 case where he set a fire at the Thompson Center.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800010&forum_id=2!#49445160)
|
 |
Date: November 19th, 2025 11:13 PM Author: kenneth play
i stole the following from reddit bc it's funny in a bleak way to think about the appellate arguments that can be raised on this, when you have an obviously guilty insane man in court yelling "i'm guilty"
--
a defendant who raises the possibility of representing himself at trial places the district court between the Scylla of trammeling the defendant's constitutional right to present his own defense, Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and the Charybdis of shirking its "constitutional duty to ensure that the defendant only represents himself with full awareness that the exercise of that right is fraught with dangers." Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d at 732; see also Patterson, 487 U.S. at 298, 108 S.Ct. at 2397-2398. No matter what decision the district court ultimately makes — whether to honor or deny the request — the defendant is likely to appeal
US v. Sandles, 23 F. 3d 1121 (7th Circuit 1994)
Moreover, a trial court must ensure that the defendant is competent to represent himself, and can appeal on the ground that the Court should not have permitted him to do so, though of course his appeal might fail. People v. Lawley, 27 Cal.4th 102 (2002)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800010&forum_id=2!#49445346) |
|
|