Josh Hammer did the Revelation of the Method re: killing Charlie Kirk
| cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | goy orbison | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | The bloodiest bhenchod | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | ..,..,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,. | 10/11/25 | | ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,... | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | The bloodiest bhenchod | 10/11/25 | | ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,... | 10/11/25 | | Murder Boner | 10/11/25 | | ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,... | 10/11/25 | | Murder Boner | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,... | 10/11/25 | | Secret Knowledge Curator | 10/11/25 | | Murder Boner | 10/11/25 | | Secret Knowledge Curator | 10/11/25 | | Murder Boner | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | Secret Knowledge Curator | 10/11/25 | | Murder Boner | 10/11/25 | | Secret Knowledge Curator | 10/11/25 | | SneakersSO | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | Murder Boner | 10/11/25 | | Secret Knowledge Curator | 10/11/25 | | Murder Boner | 10/11/25 | | Secret Knowledge Curator | 10/11/25 | | SneakersSO | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | year zero | 10/11/25 | | abcxyzabc | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | year zero | 10/11/25 | | Gay Grandpa | 10/11/25 | | Paralegal Amos | 10/11/25 | | SneakersSO | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | Gay Grandpa | 10/11/25 | | cock of michael obama | 10/11/25 | | beta-caryophyllene | 10/11/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 11th, 2025 11:19 AM Author: cock of michael obama
I have not heard of this Josh Hammer character before reading Laurent Guyénot’s below post, but Hammer - who was in Charlie Kirk’s inner circle, apparently serving as one of his handlers from above - retweeted a 2013 Trump tweet about “public execution” only a couple hours before Kirk’s assassination, and then wrote it again only a couple hours after his assassination. See Guyenot’s post about this.
Looking at Hammer’s Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Hammer), he has many features I actively dislike: fake conservative (where the only thing he cares about “conserving” is Israel’s domination over America), married to a Cohen, manages Newsweek, obsessed with promoting Jewish interests, economist major (they think way too narrowly and left-brain empirically, pea-brains), lawyer. Also his last name “Hammer” suggests aggressive action, and he has a really sinister physiognomy.
It seems pretty likely that he was doing Revelation of the Method here (https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Revelation_of_the_method) where he was bragging about his involvement.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341730) |
Date: October 11th, 2025 11:38 AM
Author: ..,..,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341772) |
Date: October 11th, 2025 12:22 PM
Author: ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,...
wow. this is quite a theory. But plz explain the shooter not putting out a statement through his lawyer that he’s just a patsy, was elsewhere when shooting happened, etc. Also why did the shooter’s dad turn him in? Is he a Mossad agent too?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341832) |
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 12:29 PM Author: cock of michael obama
We know the official story is nonsense - from Cashapp Paypal saying a 30-06 was used to kill Kirk (false), to the timeline alleging the shooter dissembled and reassembled the rifle in the woods (false) - given the official narrative has no credibility, "the shooter's dad turned him in" can't be believed either (and is also contradicted by another official narrative that the tranny furry boyfriend turned him in).
We'll see what happens with the guy in custody if he even makes it alive to trial.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341858)
|
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 12:40 PM
Author: ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,...
if you’re positioned in front of someone and you hit them in the side of the neck then there is no “exit wound.” It just removes a big chunk of flesh from the side of the neck and they pour out like a tapped beer keg. By contrast, he had gotten hit in the CENTER of his throat from that angle THEN there’d be an exit wound. This isn’t rocket surgery brej. It’s simple geometry.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341888) |
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 12:51 PM
Author: ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,...
Sure:
https://x.com/ubersoy1/status/1965852333608484944?s=46
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341916) |
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: ,:....,..,..,,,....,,....,...
How does that support your conspiracy theory that it was Mossad?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49342057) |
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 12:51 PM Author: Secret Knowledge Curator
https://youtu.be/y6zPjo5Vogc?t=269
this video breaks it down pretty well
it's just weird that people keep repeating this. like you can just watch the clip yourself. you can see the spot where it hit his chest. it left a mark on his shirt. you can see his shirt bounce upward with the shape of the body armor behind it, after the impact of the bullet
everyone on twitter was talking about this the day that it happened. everyone immediately realized that the bullet bounced off his body armor. then days later, people started repeating this "no exit wound" forcememe out of nowhere, i guess because it seems like a "good" talking point if you never actually watched the clip of him getting shot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341918) |
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 1:08 PM Author: Murder Boner
Charlie Kirk's nipples must be crazy hard to poke through titanium plate armor
https://x.com/TPOGKelly/status/1967707481964167352
Which was apparently glued onto him
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341944)
|
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: Secret Knowledge Curator
https://i.imgur.com/FXwUPhv.jpeg
body armor doesn't necessarily extend over your nipples
just watch the clip of him actually being shot. play the clip frame by frame. you can see the effects of the impact of the bullet on his chest before the wound appears on his neck. there's no ambiguity at all. it's a video clip of the event happening
i dunno if he lied to his wife about not wearing a vest or what, who knows. but he's obviously wearing one based on the actual video evidence of the incident. and it explains everything else about the footage too (no exit wound, unusually large impact wound). and if you want to believe that "israel" shot him, him wearing a bulletproof vest doesn't preclude that also being true
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49341958) |
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 1:38 PM Author: Secret Knowledge Curator
just watch the clip of him being shot. it's the direct evidence of the event occurring. none of this other stuff supersedes it. none of this other stuff explains him being impacted in the chest followed by a massive shrapnel wound on his neck
i don't even understand what "no exit wound" has anything to do with "conspiracy theories" about the assassination. he could have been (and was, clearly) wearing a bulletproof vest and there still could have been a broader conspiracy behind his assassination beyond what we're being told
the point i was originally trying to make above is that the "no exit wound" talking point is one of those weird things that one person says and then a bunch of people start repeating it as supporting evidence for a pet theory of theirs when there's no connection between the two at all, and they're just repeating it because it "sounds good"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49342027) |
 |
Date: October 11th, 2025 1:42 PM Author: SneakersSO
You’ve got to be the worst Lawyer ever lmao. Gtfo of here and accept that you Lost the argument and are just spreading nonsense.
Btw the “no exit wound” people are saying that
1. the wound we saw was the exit wound and he was shot from his right rear
or
2. Magical Israel assassination using something besides a bullet
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49342036) |
Date: October 11th, 2025 3:09 PM Author: beta-caryophyllene
only one second shooter theory in the history of second shooter theories has ever been true: sirhan sirhan shooting wildly into the crowd under hypnosis while someone else sneaks up and point-blank executes RFK. in that case there was LOTS of evidence that something didn't add up (from the coroner report among other things).
to pull it off with kirk would require insanely tighter coordination than that and you'd be able to see that they weren't letting anyone else examine the body or other irregularities. too many moving parts in both the execution and the coverup. occam's razor says shrapnel theory is true.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5785363&forum_id=2!#49342195) |
|
|