PROTIP: use "Websters dictionary defines..." to start ur closing
| violet public bath | 04/24/15 | | Out-of-control Charismatic Library | 04/24/15 | | Mahogany locale | 04/24/15 | | Ivory wonderful laser beams business firm | 04/24/15 | | dashing center | 10/22/15 | | Provocative famous landscape painting | 10/22/15 | | vigorous half-breed heaven | 10/22/15 | | Vivacious topaz piazza | 10/22/15 | | beta translucent dysfunction | 10/22/15 | | Word combinations | 10/08/25 | | outnumbered casino | 10/22/15 | | violet public bath | 05/16/16 | | yapping histrionic round eye | 05/16/16 | | violet public bath | 05/16/16 | | yapping histrionic round eye | 05/16/16 | | violet public bath | 05/16/16 | | razzle-dazzle stag film | 12/28/16 | | Blathering Fat Ankles | 12/28/16 | | orchid hunting ground | 12/28/16 | | razzle-dazzle stag film | 11/11/20 | | internet-worthy trust fund pisswyrm | 07/26/24 | | Paralegal Adolf Hitler | 10/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 24th, 2015 2:57 PM Author: violet public bath
It has a reputation now as this hackneyed expression, which is why it WORKS. The jury always perks up because it's so unexpected. Also it frames the issue very clearly: this is the plain definition, here are the facts, the facts don't match the accusation, acquittal. I literally bring a well-worn old dictionary and thump it onto the jury railing.
Prosecutors get flustered as FUCK and end up reacting to me rather than making their own case, and it makes them look gay as hell. They smirk or scoff, which makes them look like douches. They usually take time in their own closings to say something about "the defense counsel's old tricks and theatrics" but that just reminds the jury even more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2862749&forum_id=2!#27751704) |
|
|