Taking bets on the legal outcome of the ICE shooting
| Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | Ruddy Organic Girlfriend | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | Galvanic lilac tanning salon main people | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | Galvanic lilac tanning salon main people | 01/10/26 | | Galvanic lilac tanning salon main people | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | Galvanic lilac tanning salon main people | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | Galvanic lilac tanning salon main people | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | cracking shrine psychic | 01/11/26 | | Duck-like Really Tough Guy | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | Aggressive tattoo | 01/10/26 | | Nudist nubile location liquid oxygen | 01/10/26 | | Insane splenetic resort goyim | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | shimmering bipolar school factory reset button | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | cracking shrine psychic | 01/11/26 | | cracking shrine psychic | 01/11/26 | | domesticated citrine haunted graveyard | 01/10/26 | | navy hell | 01/10/26 | | Razzmatazz center regret | 01/11/26 | | cracking shrine psychic | 01/11/26 | | Exciting Space Striped Hyena | 01/11/26 | | electric menage double fault | 01/10/26 | | Floppy property travel guidebook | 01/10/26 | | provocative olive associate pozpig | 01/10/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/10/26 | | glittery yapping stain | 01/11/26 | | cracking shrine psychic | 01/11/26 | | Racy crawly roast beef | 01/10/26 | | navy hell | 01/10/26 | | cracking shrine psychic | 01/11/26 | | Exciting Space Striped Hyena | 01/11/26 | | Cerebral toaster | 01/11/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 10th, 2026 5:20 PM Author: Cerebral toaster
- Ross receives executive clemency (non-prosecution or preemptive pardon). State will wait to prosecute until a lib President comes around. If Ross receives a preemptive pardon, the federal government will let Ross be prosecuted by the state. If the case is removed to federal court, the court will find that he doesn't meet the Neagle standard and deny dismissal (of course the Department of Justice will file a brief in support of the prosecution). He is convicted of murder (imperfect self defense is not a defense under Minnesota law). If no pardon, lib administration prosecutes and gets a little time for deprivation under color of law.
- Good's wife sues Ross under Bivens, possibly the FTCA. Court finds there was reasonable suspicion for detention but (1) no reasonable fear given that he saw her turning away from him, and/or (2) excessive force given officer-created jeopardy (going in front of her car). Probably 1 is more likely because the lib judge will appeal-proof it by making it as dependent on factual findings as possible.
- Car owners hit by Good's car sue Good's estate for negligence and the United States under the FTCA. They settle with Good's estate for PD limit and with the United States for the remainder.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2!#49579315) |
 |
Date: January 10th, 2026 6:11 PM Author: Galvanic lilac tanning salon main people
so it's like a mini trial on the merits? and behaving outside policy strips you of the right to remove?
i thought the "scope" turns on whether you're doing the role that your federal office envisions. so a cop doing arrests or stops or whatever is in the "scope" even if they broke some policy.
(i have no idea what i'm talking about, btw.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2!#49579469) |
 |
Date: January 10th, 2026 6:19 PM Author: Cerebral toaster
You know what, the standard for removal is different then the standard for immunity, and I didn't know enough about it until today. I'm poasting far too carelessly and I apologize.
The standard for immunity is whether he's acting reasonably within the scope of his authority IIRC. Here I think his failure to abide most likely fucks up the 'reasonably' part. If ICE policy was 'kill anyone who drives in your direction' or 'kill all woman drivers' probably he would prevail.
The standard for remand is whether there's a plausible federal defense. Definitely he has a plausible federal defense, so he won't get remanded. Correcting myself again now.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2!#49579502) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 5:22 PM Author: Duck-like Really Tough Guy
“simply refusing to remove the case to federal court”
doesn’t that right belong to the defendant?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2!#49579321) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 6:33 PM Author: domesticated citrine haunted graveyard
The shitlib infestation of xo is unacceptable. Both dykes attempted to murder one or more federal agents.
Maybe some pussy hat wearing MN judge will try some bullshit but unless USA is in full shitlib banana republic mode by then, ICE is just going to tell them to eat shit and Ross won’t even appear.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2!#49579530) |
|
|