The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Scorching Fifth Circuit dissent - link
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:07 PM Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... https://x.com/jadler1969/status/1991251392816611498?s=20 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444729) |
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:28 PM Author: coiffed sandwich heres the actual dissent which is a thousand times more 180 than that shitty twitter link:
https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/gov.uscourts.txwd_.1150387.1439.0.pdf |
 |
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:48 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., cr. very xo 2020's poasting twitter images of parts of decisions (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444819) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:32 PM Author: Candy Ride Is Jerry a woman? The first 5 pages are just about the writer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444945) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:52 PM Author: hank_scorpio honestly we need to pass legislation to limit judicial opinions to a few pages at most, letting these faggots go on and on is bad for everyone and produces nothing, absolutely nothing, of value (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444826) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:25 AM *your legislation has been struck down as a vialation separation of powers. The SCOTUS opinion is 6-2-1 and 800 cumulative pages.* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445612) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 10:49 AM Author: zoomer sexuality expert i love it when I have an old school contract or real property research project and find these 3 or 4-page opinions from 1921. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49446199) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:54 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., i got an A in fed courts, but can someone explain to me why a USDJ is on a 3-judge district court panel with judge smith of the 5th cir? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444830) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:05 PM Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... 3 judge panels are required by statute in certain Voting Rights Act cases. Was enacted during the Jim Crow era to reduce the likelihood that some biased southern judge would disregard the law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444859) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:11 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., ty. next q: how does an active non-sr COA judge end up a 3-judge usdc panel?
does this mean he's disqualified from being in the pool to hear the case in the 5th cir? and disqualified from sitting en banc? |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:37 PM Author: Nazca Redlines The case goes to the original Dist. J. to whom it was assigned plus 2 judges designated by POTUS of the relevant COA, at least one of whom must be a COA judge.
I presume the COA judge would not be on the panel for the appeal. Maybe he could be sitting en banc. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:38 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., woah. does any other suit get such procedure? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444967) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:43 PM Author: Nazca Redlines Yes--Mostly but not entirely voting and elections related (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444978) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 2:03 AM Author: rear naked choke This is still law bort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445485) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:45 PM Author: ~~(> ' ' )> (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444987) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 8:30 PM Author: kenneth play ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445071) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:06 PM Author: May I meet you? ((zurich is stained)) Comes off ysff, almost as bad as TSINAH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444870) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:13 PM Author: Online Men Blistering! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444885) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:17 PM Author: LathamTouchedMe "How dare they deny me the opportunity to offer my deep and thoughtful legal analysis!"
First sentence of dissent: "The main winners from Judge Brown's opinion are George Soros and Gavin Newsom."
|
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:15 PM Author: coiffed sandwich It contains tons of thoughtful legal analysis if you’d bother to read on (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445161) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:21 PM Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... Wait, it's a Trump judge the dissent reamed?
https://afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Brown-Snapshot-Final.pdf |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:22 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., holy shit wtf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444920) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:27 PM Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... Not only a Trump appointee, but from a highly conservative state with a Senator - Ted Cruz - who's normally very careful about ensuring no libs slip through. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444932) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:31 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., very good point. and it also looks like he hawaii judge'd the biden fraudvax mandate for fed employees (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444943) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:50 PM Author: Nazca Redlines He was on the Texas (Civil) SCOTUS for 6 years, so there would have been a strong track record of how he rules. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444992) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:23 PM Author: Candy Ride Wow. George Soros. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444926) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:29 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
1. Extremely Boomerish dissent. There's no reason this couldn't have been trimmed down to 20 pages.
2. Having said that, Jerry Smith has been one of the biggest COA > SCOTUS Feeders for decades. Libs might be laughing now, but this guy unironically has the ear of several SCOTUS Justices and he seems EXTREMELY PISSED about how all of this went down, on every level. When this decision inevitably gets appealed to SCOTUS, I'm not sure things will ultimately turn out the way libs are hoping they will. We'll see what unfolds! |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:39 PM Author: Nazca Redlines This is about as shocking a statement as you'll see in a "scathing" dissent: "I also need to highlight the pernicious judicial misbehavior of U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444968) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:42 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., yep. he also says 20 times that the majesty of law is fraud and it's all politics. has any judge said such things in an opinion before? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444976) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:45 PM Author: Nazca Redlines This is in the same vein: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMC7Ntd4d4c (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49444986) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 8:01 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., wow, is this real (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445013) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:32 PM Author: wait till biggus dickus hears of this 180 autism
As he stood in that room describing the handgun, it seemed like any second he was going to casually pan to the side and have a bound and gagged shitlib and clinically explain the handgun's firing mechanism as he blows their brains out |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:59 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., i'm reading the berzon concurrence trashing van dyke:
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/03/20/23-55805.pdf
where is she wrong? she kinda seems right |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:45 PM Author: Junko Enoshima "If, however, there were a Nobel Prize for Fiction, Judge Brown's opinion would be a prime candidate."
I'm going to be thinking about this sentence. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:45 PM Author: lucius quinctius cincinnatus (his own flesh as well as all space was still a cage) Wow. I'd love to meet Judge Smith's clerks. Or interview one or two. I'd also love to know what the horse-trading there is behind the scenes on this one. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 12:53 PM Author: CapTTTainFalcon as everyone knows, he hires only 1Ls after one semester of grades (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49446658) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 7:53 PM Author: Nazca Redlines I read the first few pages. The complained-of conduct--at least the conduct Judge Smith is leading with--is that the majority didn't let him see a draft of their opinion until shortly before they issued it (with a note that Judge Smith would be appending a dissent).
That's it? That's his first and best argument? Who cares? |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 8:23 PM Author: Lab Diamond Dallas Trump I'm sure the opinion is shit but going absolutely BERSERK over drafting practices that the general public doesn't give a shit about dramatically undermines his dissent.
He sounds like some lawyer who brought in biglaw as co-counsel because he couldn't handle the case and is MAF that they filed the MSJ without getting all his edits. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 8:01 PM Author: millennial unc gamer with 400ms reaction time lol this guy is 180 as shit
fuck libs |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 12:32 AM Author: peeface (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445419) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 8:26 PM Author: Lab Diamond Dallas Trump page 16: Second, the other factors, discussed below, are extraordinarily week [sic] in this case.
Also page 16: If this were a law school exam, the opinion would deserve an “F.” |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 8:30 PM Author: kenneth play (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445072) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 11:07 PM Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... Fifth Circuit guru says majority op is solid:
https://x.com/RMFifthCircuit/status/1991174150615081310 |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:00 AM Author: UhOh thanks, raffi! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445885) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 1:17 AM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) This is THE DEFINITION of "yosemite sam fuming mad". (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49445480) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 10:45 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., the image of this guy driving back from a funeral steaming maf is hilarious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49446187) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 10:19 AM Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/19/jeffrey-brown-texas-redistricting-00660068 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49446088) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 10:47 AM Author: UhOh the thing is blacks vote 95% dem, so you can never make a politically driven redistricting without it appearing to target blacks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49446192) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 10:49 AM Author: coiffed sandwich and its also absurd that the court would find an argument that GOP is intentionally forgoing seats in favor of being able to racially discriminate persuasive. at absolutely no level of the party that makes choices about redistricting is a single person thinking this, and everyone knows it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800066&forum_id=2!#49446200) |