Woman gets 34% more Tinder matches after digitally enhancing tits from A to DD
| michael doodikoff | 09/03/25 | | stardew valley digital homesteading gf | 09/03/25 | | Diamond Dallas Trump | 09/03/25 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 09/03/25 | | Diamond Dallas Trump | 09/03/25 | | scholarship | 09/03/25 | | gin and eschatonic | 09/03/25 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 09/03/25 | | scholarship | 09/03/25 | | Texas School Book Suppository | 09/03/25 | | Diamond Dallas Trump | 09/03/25 | | scholarship | 09/03/25 | | stardew valley digital homesteading gf | 09/03/25 | | gibberish (?) | 09/03/25 | | .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; | 09/03/25 | | Oh, you travel? | 09/03/25 | | Judas Jones | 09/03/25 | | Texas School Book Suppository | 09/03/25 | | Bob Rooney | 09/03/25 | | michael doodikoff | 09/03/25 | | stardew valley digital homesteading gf | 09/03/25 | | Solomon Pacifico, Attorney-at-Law | 09/03/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 3rd, 2025 2:45 PM Author: stardew valley digital homesteading gf
men aren't like that.
trust me. i know these things.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5769468&forum_id=2"#49234078) |
Date: September 3rd, 2025 3:03 PM Author: Diamond Dallas Trump
the 34% understates the mathematical effect because she was always going to be capped at 1000 matches and her baseline was 600. some percentage of the matches she didn't get was made up of inactive users, people who didn't see her profile, etc. looking at the reduction in the rejection percentage is a better measure than total number of matches.
bottom line is that in going from 600 to 800 matches, she picked up AT LEAST 50% of the most selective guys who didn't swipe her before. if you assume 100 never saw her profile and that the real sample size is 900, she is picking up 67% of the rejection population.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5769468&forum_id=2"#49234121) |
 |
Date: September 3rd, 2025 3:31 PM Author: Diamond Dallas Trump
with a name like "scholarship," you should already know that the difference will be less pronounced due to diminishing returns, especially using the same calculations as the authors. if she is already picking up virtually all potential matches, it's impossible for her to increase the raw number of matches much.
that is why the DDC method of looking at the rejection population is absolutely critical here. if her baseline is 850 matches and she goes to 880 with augmentation, that is still a very meaningful increase even though it's not a large change in the raw number. if you can control out users who were always going to arbitrarily exclude her for reasons such as race or religion and exclude them from the sample size, the increase becomes even larger.
unfortunately, what is very difficult to model for is the fact that those last 30 matches she picks up are probably more desirable than the prior 850 combined. they are likely to be the true Chads, the most selective men, and a match with one of them is worth 40-50x a match with a Melvin. If we could properly model that, the returns would show us that the increase in breast size improved her attractiveness by THOUSANDS of percentage points.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5769468&forum_id=2"#49234189) |
|
|