Founding Fathers by Clique
| cowgod | 12/22/25 | | gibberish (?) | 12/22/25 | | Wes Scantlin | 12/22/25 | | cowgod | 12/23/25 | | barnabyjones | 12/22/25 | | cowgod | 12/23/25 | | ....,.,.;;;,.,,:,.,.,::,.....,:,..,.. | 12/23/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 22nd, 2025 10:10 PM Author: cowgod
George Washington — Prep/Jock
Alexander Hamilton — Loser
James Madison — Prep
Gouverneur Morris — Prep
James Wilson — Loser
John Jay — Prep
Thomas Jefferson — Prep
John Adams — Loser
Benjamin Franklin — Nerd
Samuel Adams — Loser
Patrick Henry — Loser
Thomas Paine — Low Loser
Nathanael Greene — Loser
Henry Knox — Nerd
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2"#49532774) |
 |
Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:30 AM Author: cowgod
Francis Marion was a High Loser who commanded an irregular army of Scumbags. Marion’s men were not produced by the Revolution, they were exposed by it. Clique Theory orthodoxy holds that Scumbags exist prior to ideology and become operational when hierarchy loosens, and the Carolina swamps functioned as a solvent that stripped away residual restraint. These were bodies already trained by deprivation, dampness, and casual violence, for whom liberty was not an idea but a temporary suspension of consequence. Scumbags do not metabolize abstraction, they respond to permission, grievance, and proximity to force. The swamp rewarded endurance, disappearance, and predation while dissolving discipline, paperwork, and permanence. Marion did not reform this material, orthodoxy forbids reform, he merely vectored it outward through scarcity, silence, and selective tolerance. Violence was not condemned, it was aimed. The effectiveness of the force derived from its incompatibility with institutions. When the republic congealed into law, property, and legibility, these bodies became excess matter. History then performed sanitation, recoding Scumbags as rustic patriots, preserving the myth while erasing the mechanism.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2"#49533244) |
 |
Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:18 AM Author: cowgod
In a 1807 letter to Benjamin Rush, Adams listed Washington’s “talents” in a way that is clearly sarcastic about what made him admired: focusing on looks, height, and fortune rather than intellect or learning:
Adams described Washington’s qualities as including a “handsome Face,” a “tall Stature,” “elegant Form,” and “graceful Attitudes and Movement,” then concluded without mentioning reading, thinking, or writing — implicitly mocking the idea that Washington’s greatness came from intellect.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2"#49533237)
|
Date: December 23rd, 2025 8:25 AM
Author: ....,.,.;;;,.,,:,.,.,::,.....,:,..,..
no scumbags?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5813332&forum_id=2"#49533240) |
|
|