The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
the complete ruination of the british 'royal' family
| super bowl | 02/19/26 |
| richard clock | 02/19/26 |
| ataraxic | 02/19/26 |
| super bowl | 02/19/26 |
| ataraxic | 02/19/26 |
| richard clock | 02/19/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 19th, 2026 7:10 AM Author: super bowl (No Future) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836207&forum_id=2"#49679705) |
Date: February 19th, 2026 7:10 AM Author: richard clock is 180
they should have scrapped the whole thing "years" ago |
 |
Date: February 19th, 2026 7:16 AM Author: ataraxic a proper "royal family" would have scrapped the clown show that is british parliament centuries ago but they don't have the balls to run a country much less to retake power so it's six of one half a dozen dozen of the other (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836207&forum_id=2"#49679711) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 7:20 AM Author: super bowl (No Future) constitutional monarchy may be the cuckiest form of government
on the one hand you have a 'monarch' with no actual power who watches the commoners rule their country (aka buttfuck their wife)
on the other hand you have a normal modern democratic republic except you have to pay taxes to this family of inbred celebrities and give them police protection and act like they matter and name everything after them |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 7:30 AM Author: ataraxic it's a good form of government if it is unapologetic about the monarchy part and the monarch has the balls to put his foot down against the stupidities of "democracy," as it was first intended. it's stupid as it exists because it is functionally a full parliamentary democracy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836207&forum_id=2"#49679723) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 7:53 AM Author: richard clock (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836207&forum_id=2"#49679741) |