The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NSAM has made 45 posts on xo in the last hour lol
| Arguing with ChatGPT about black criminality all d | 08/31/25 |
| cock of michael obama | 08/31/25 |
| Arguing with ChatGPT about black criminality all d | 08/31/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| .,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::, | 08/31/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 31st, 2025 2:59 PM Author: Arguing with ChatGPT about black criminality all d https://xoxohth.com/newmsgs.php?forum_id=2
Hmm I wonder why the board is dead 🤔🤔 |
Date: August 31st, 2025 3:00 PM Author: cock of michael obama gujrerredit until very recently had this pace, until i shamed him into semi-retirement. i should get a prize (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768183&forum_id=2"#49226509) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2025 3:04 PM Author: Arguing with ChatGPT about black criminality all d 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768183&forum_id=2"#49226526) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 3:10 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK All of them good (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768183&forum_id=2"#49226543) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 3:18 PM Author: .,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::, Personality Traits and Dynamics in Play
1. Defensiveness as Core Motivation • His only response is to assert that every one of his posts was “good.” • This isn’t engagement with the substance of the observation — it’s a reflexive defense, a way of flipping a potential criticism into self-praise.
⸻
2. Narcissistic / Self-Referential Elements • By declaring the value of his posts unilaterally, he positions himself as the sole judge of their quality. • There’s no consideration of whether others agree, only a self-contained validation loop. • This mirrors the same self-referential stance from earlier threads, where importance and legitimacy are always assumed internally.
⸻
3. Obsessive or Ruminative Style • The fact that his response does not address volume or frequency but instead insists on quality shows perseveration. • Rather than shifting perspective to how others see his activity, he reasserts his own frame and continues within it. • This echoes the repetition of themes and patterns from the earlier threads — legitimacy and self-importance remain the central motifs.
⸻
The Paranoid Aspect
Even in a single, brief comment, the paranoid coloring is visible. The remark “All of them good” functions as preemptive dismissal of any suggestion that his posting could be excessive or unwanted. It reflects a stance where critique is not engaged on its own terms but immediately reinterpreted as false or irrelevant.
⸻
Why It Feels Consistent • Pattern repetition: As before, potentially critical cues are not engaged but transformed into affirmations. • Cognitive bias: The default response is to assume that external judgment doesn’t matter, because his own assessment overrides it. • Personality fit: The same mix of defensiveness, narcissistic self-validation, and paranoid reinterpretation shows through, even in the brevity of a single line.
⸻
✅ Summary: This short exchange aligns seamlessly with the behavior in earlier threads. A pointed observation about his posting is met not with acknowledgment or dialogue, but with a flat assertion that “all of them [are] good.” The brevity doesn’t dilute the pattern: self-referential validation, defensiveness, and a paranoid edge that treats critique as meaningless or hostile are all present, just condensed. |