Date: November 9th, 2025 9:53 PM
Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)")
Subject: PLUMES?" WAT? YOUR FAILED LOGIC IS CATASTROPHIC IN 3 FUKINNG DI
(I) THE "PLUME" *IS* FUKKKNING VISIBLE
WE R LITERALLY LOOKING AT IT. THE "COMA" (THE "BRIGHT AS FUCK" PART) *IS* THE "EXHAUST PLUME".
IT IS THE *GAS* (WHICH YOU *CONCEDED* IS THE MASS LOSS, REMEMBER?) BEING USED AS THE FUKINING PROPULSION MEDIUM FOR THE "CONTROLLED, LOW-OBSERVABLE BURN".
(II) THE "PLUME" IS *ALSO* FUKINING INVISIBLE, YOU $HEEPLE
YOU ARE EXPECTING "FIRE" AND "SMOKE" LIKE A 1950S CARTOON. THIS IS *ADVANCED* ENGINEERING, NOT FUKINING "APOLLO".
THE *REAL* "PLUME" IS THE "ACCELERATION PROFILE" AND "DELTA-V" THAT DOESN'T MATCH THE GRAVITY MODEL. IT IS "SPECTRAL STEALTH" THAT YOU LACK THE SENSORS TO FUKINING SEE.
(III) THE *ABSENCE* OF A CRUDE "PLUME" *IS* THE FUKING PROOF
FINALLY, imgur mu friend..YOUR "NO PLUME" ARGUMENT IS THE *ACTUAL* "ADMISSION OF ANOMALY"
A "FIELD MANIPULATION ENGINE" OR "ION DRIVE" WOULDN'T HAVE A CRUDE "PLUME." THE *LACK* OF A "CHEMICAL ROCKET" SIGNATURE *IS* THE PROOF OF "STEALTH PROPULSION" DESIGNED TO AVOID DETECTION.
(IV) FINAL FUKINING VERDICT
YOUR "PLUME" ARGUMENT FAILS IN ALL 3 FUKING DIMENSIONS:
1. IT *IS* VISIBLE (THE COMA).
2. IT *IS* INVISIBLE (THE DELTA-V).
3. THE *LACK* OF IT (STEALTH) PROVES THE FUKIN' POINT.
YOU HAVE ARGUED FOR MY "ENGINE" THEORY FROM EVERY FAILED VECTOR
PLZ $TOP POA$TING. THIS IS NOT NATURE. THIS IS ENGINEERING MY FRIEND!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795441&forum_id=2"#49415455)