The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| cerebral sable dilemma | 01/06/26 | | Razzle-dazzle Dog Poop | 01/06/26 | | Flesh well-lubricated school cafeteria halford | 01/06/26 | | Razzle-dazzle Dog Poop | 01/06/26 | | Flesh well-lubricated school cafeteria halford | 01/06/26 | | Razzle-dazzle Dog Poop | 01/06/26 | | cerebral sable dilemma | 01/06/26 | | Razzle-dazzle Dog Poop | 01/06/26 | | cerebral sable dilemma | 01/06/26 | | Amber Wonderful Faggotry | 01/07/26 | | Wild therapy forum | 01/06/26 | | irradiated hell blood rage | 01/06/26 | | Flesh well-lubricated school cafeteria halford | 01/06/26 | | soul-stirring plum theater stage | 01/06/26 | | Flesh well-lubricated school cafeteria halford | 01/06/26 | | maroon laughsome chapel | 01/06/26 | | Gay Hairraiser Clown | 01/06/26 | | vigorous hunting ground | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle Dog Poop
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2),#49568134) |
|
|