www.grokipedia.com

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790915&forum_id=2),#49382557)

This has been very low hanging fruit ever since LLMs were developed that nobody has had the ambition to attempt until now

If he sees this through it could potentially be one of his most successful and impactful endeavors and be extremely profitable too not flame

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790915&forum_id=2),#49382565)

Michael Madsen popped in my head so I compared the two -- it's basically just a rephrased copy. even has the same section layout

if wikipedia fights back and forces them to use bootstraps instead of cribbing homework (if such a thing is even possible, which it's realistically probably not), smells like model collapse waiting to happen to me

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790915&forum_id=2),#49382684)

Critics, often from ideologically aligned institutions, have highlighted perceived authoritarian tendencies and media influence, yet empirical measures of democratic backsliding remain contested, with Modi's governments securing repeated mandates through direct elections.

A defining controversy from his Gujarat tenure involves the 2002 riots following the Godhra train burning, which resulted in over a thousand deaths, predominantly Muslim; Modi faced allegations of complicity or inaction, but a Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) granted him a clean chit in 2012, a verdict upheld by the court in 2022, dismissing claims of a larger conspiracy as unsubstantiated despite persistent narratives in segments of the media and opposition.

Modi in Wikipedia:

Under Modi's tenure, India has experienced democratic backsliding and has shifted towards an authoritarian style of government, with a cult of personality centred around him.[f]

His administration is considered complicit in the 2002 Gujarat riots[c] and has been criticised for its management of the crisis.

While his policies as chief minister were credited for encouraging economic growth, his administration was criticised for failing to significantly improve health, poverty and education indices in the state.[e]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790915&forum_id=2),#49382614)

Grok:

More contentious revelations emerged from FBI archival summaries examined by historian David Garrow in 2019, alleging King's complicity in a January 6, 1964, Washington, D.C., hotel suite incident where a woman was sexually assaulted by Logan Kearse, a Baltimore pastor, while King and others reportedly watched and laughed without intervening.[47] [51] These claims derive from typed summaries prepared by FBI agents, not verbatim transcripts or the original audio, which remain sealed by court order until 2027 due to privacy concerns.[131] Critics, including some King scholars, caution against accepting the summaries at face value given the FBI's documented animus toward King—rooted in J. Edgar Hoover's personal vendetta—and the lack of independent corroboration for the most extreme assertions, though Garrow argues the bureau's meticulous documentation lends credibility to the sexual misconduct patterns.[51] [131] Subsequent releases of FBI records in July 2025, including wiretap transcripts, reaffirmed the extent of the surveillance but did not introduce verified new details beyond previously known infidelity evidence.[132]

The tapes' contents highlight tensions between King's moral advocacy and private behavior, with no evidence they influenced his public effectiveness, as the FBI's smear efforts failed to sway media or public opinion at the time.[48] While the surveillance violated King's privacy and exceeded legal bounds—later deemed unconstitutional by courts—the empirical record from the recordings substantiates a double life inconsistent with his preached standards of personal rectitude.[122]

Wiki:

In 1977, district court judge John Lewis Smith Jr. ordered the recorded audiotapes and written transcripts resulting from the FBI's electronic surveillance of King between 1963-68 to be sealed from public access in the National Archives until 2027.[444] In 2019, an FBI file emerged on which a handwritten note alleged that King "looked on, laughed and offered advice" as one of his friends raped a woman. Historians who have examined this notional evidence have dismissed it as highly unreliable.[445][446] David Garrow, a King biographer, wrote that "the suggestion ... that he either actively tolerated or personally employed violence against any woman, even while drunk, poses so fundamental a challenge to his historical stature as to require the most complete and extensive historical review possible".[447][446] Garrow's reliance on a handwritten note appended to a typed report is considered poor scholarship by other authorities. The professor of American studies at the University of Nottingham, Peter Ling, pointed out that Garrow was excessively credulous, if not naive, in accepting the accuracy of FBI reports during a period when it was undertaking an operation to attempt to discredit King.[448] Professors Jeanne Theoharis, Barbara Ransby, Nathan Connolly and Glenda Gilmore have expressed reservations about Garrow's scholarship. Theoharis commented "Most scholars I know would penalize graduate students for doing this." It is not the first time the rigor of Garrow's work has been called into serious question.[446] Clayborne Carson, King biographer and overseer of the Dr. King records at Stanford University states that he came to the opposite conclusion of Garrow:

None of this is new. Garrow is talking about a recently added summary of a transcript of a 1964 recording from the Willard Hotel that others, including Mrs. King, have said they did not hear Martin's voice on it. The added summary was four layers removed from the actual recording. This supposedly new information comes from an anonymous source in a single paragraph in an FBI report. You have to ask how could anyone conclude King looked at a rape from an audio recording in a room where he was not present.[449]

The tapes that could confirm or refute the allegation are scheduled to be declassified in 2027.[450]

In his 1989 autobiography And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, Ralph Abernathy stated that King had a "weakness for women", although they "all understood and believed in the biblical prohibition against sex outside of marriage. It was just that he had a particularly difficult time with that temptation."[451] In a later interview, Abernathy said he only wrote the term "womanizing", that he did not specifically say King had extramarital sex and that the infidelities were emotional rather than sexual.[452] Abernathy criticized the media for sensationalizing the statements he wrote about King's affairs,[452] such as the allegation King had a sexual affair the night before he was assassinated.[452] In his 1986 book Bearing the Cross, Garrow wrote about affairs, including one woman King saw almost daily. According to Garrow, "that relationship ... increasingly became the emotional centerpiece of King's life, but it did not eliminate the incidental couplings ... of King's travels." He alleged that King explained his affairs as "a form of anxiety reduction". Garrow asserted that King's supposed promiscuity caused him "painful and at times overwhelming guilt".[453] King's wife Coretta appeared to have accepted his affairs with equanimity, saying once that "all that other business just doesn't have a place in the very high-level relationship we enjoyed."[454] Shortly after Bearing the Cross was released, civil rights author Howell Raines gave the book a positive review but opined that Garrow's allegations about King's sex life were "sensational" and stated that Garrow was "amassing facts rather than analyzing them".[455]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790915&forum_id=2),#49383435)

Transgender refers to individuals whose self-perceived gender identity conflicts with their biological sex, the latter defined by dimorphic reproductive roles in which males produce small gametes (sperm) and females produce large gametes (ova), as determined by chromosomal, gonadal, and anatomical characteristics from conception.[1][2] This mismatch often manifests as gender dysphoria, a clinical diagnosis in the DSM-5 characterized by a marked incongruence between one's experienced gender and primary/secondary sex characteristics, lasting at least six months and causing clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other functioning.[3][4]

Prevalence of transgender identification has risen sharply since the early 2010s, particularly among adolescents and young adults, with U.S. estimates indicating approximately 0.6% of adults and higher rates among youth (around 1-2% in recent surveys), though some data suggest a recent decline in young adult identification, potentially reflecting shifts in social trends.[5][6][7] This increase coincides with expanded access to social media and peer networks, where clusters of identification have been observed, prompting hypotheses of social influence or contagion alongside biological and psychological factors, though causal mechanisms remain uncertain and debated.[8] Many transgender individuals report co-occurring conditions such as autism spectrum traits, depression, and anxiety at elevated rates, complicating etiological understanding.[9]

Treatments typically involve social transition (e.g., name/pronoun changes), puberty suppression, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries to approximate desired physical traits, but evidence for long-term benefits, especially in minors, is limited and of low quality, as highlighted by the 2024 Cass Review, which critiqued the field's reliance on weak studies and ideological assumptions over rigorous data.[10][11] Controversies persist regarding youth interventions' risks (e.g., infertility, bone density loss), desistance rates in pre-pubertal cases (up to 80-90% without intervention), participation in sex-segregated sports and facilities, and the influence of institutional biases in research and policy, where systematic overemphasis on affirmation has sidelined exploratory therapies and outcome tracking.[12][13]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790915&forum_id=2),#49383468)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790915&forum_id=2),#49383736)