The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Words as Forcefields: The Exile of Symbolic Speech
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 17th, 2025 11:05 AM Author: cock of michael obama This essay explores the dual nature of language: as a mere tool for conveying facts, and as a potent forcefield shaping perception, belief, and the very architecture of consciousness. Tracing language’s historical transformation from sacred initiator to flattened procedural instrument, it reveals how modernity’s empirical and managerial regimes manipulate symbols to colonize souls and control populations. Against this backdrop, the rise of AI language models presents new spiritual dangers by subtly altering our inner symbolic fields.
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/words-as-forcefields-the-exile-of
this is my love letter to you, goy retardstar. may you read it and spittle out "THESE WORDS DON'T MEAN ANYTHING!" "YOU'RE USING LLMS THE WRONG WAY!!!" in good health |
Date: August 17th, 2025 11:11 AM Author: Rich Innerlife Have you ever read Snow Crash? If not it is a must-read for you with key insights into the role of language in bio-and spiritual hacking in a cyber-dystopia dissident context. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191784) |
 |
Date: August 17th, 2025 11:22 AM Author: cock of michael obama i'll add it to the list, thank (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191800) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 11:55 AM Author: ''''''"'''"" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191856) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 12:35 PM Author: sentient octopus There's nothing constructive I can say to you that I haven't already said. I don't think it's a good idea for you to engage in this kind of narcissistic masturbation with LLMs. I would say the same thing to anyone else who I encountered doing this, as a matter of concern for their well-being. It's not something that I'm choosing to criticize you, specifically, for doing, for the purpose of criticizing you personally
That being said, you're an adult and you make your own decisions. You've got a blog that other people read and enjoy, and if they like this kind of posting and you like posting it, keep on doing your thing. I think you should probably consider making portions of what you publish less obviously written by LLMs, because people might judge you negatively, but don't take that as a blanket suggestion. I'm actually not sure that's correct. I might be wrong about that. I've definitely seen some pretty convincing evidence otherwise |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 12:39 PM Author: cock of michael obama I agree that there's not much to say further on this point as you're stuck in a flattened empiricist paradigm, but this was a useful exercise to elaborate to myself and others my perspective - and you served as the precipitating cause for this as I was constantly annoyed with you, so thank you. Regarding using LLMs for writing, my process is to draft a full first draft and then use the LLM for flow refinement - finding the right balance between use and not use is a tricky thing I am still navigating. I appreciate your feedback here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191918) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 12:47 PM Author: ataraxic what's the point of writing if you're using ai to do it for you
it's one thing to use ai to do your homework or your job, another thing entirely to use it for personal writing |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 12:50 PM Author: cock of michael obama As I wrote, my first draft is my own - I don't mind using it to increase flow, clarity, and polish. Everyone historically used editors pre-publication for the same reasons - I look at it the same way, it's just the LLM is doing the editing for free. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191946) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 12:59 PM Author: sentient octopus Some of the top blogs on Substack are written by LLMs. It's a very successful (and profitable) strategy for writers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191952) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 1:09 PM Author: cock of michael obama yeah, and all of it is transparent slop. I think most of those subscribers are bots. I (currently) do not have paid subs on (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191964) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 4:31 PM Author: ataraxic if it's just a side hustle or a business that's obviously fine. consuela is apparently trying to do life's intellectual work on substack. i have no interest in reading any slopified content if i can knowingly avoid it and if i were consuela i would consider the use of ai for my writing both embarrassing and self-defeating. if i can't write interestingly or even proficiently on my own without training wheels i don't deserve to have readers. and if it's not me who is being read for what purpose am i writing in the first place. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49192388) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 1:10 PM Author: sentient octopus I'm more referring to using LLMs to come up with the substance of your writing itself. Although you should be more careful with specific language, too (or not? Like I said I'm increasingly unsure about this. People genuinely like LLM language, which shouldn't be surprising when you think about it). There are multiple paragraphs in your post that are pretty clearly LLM-generated, with light edits
The blog entry itself is LLM slop. There's no nice way to put it. The content of the essay doesn't make any sense because it was generated by an LLM. It's fundamentally incoherent. It's the same thing that chillmata tp is doing in this thread:
https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762037&mc=126&forum_id=2
He's doing it tongue in cheek and having fun with it, and I suspect that to a certain extent you actually are too. You just gotta be careful because now that you've started using LLMs instead of doing your own thinking and writing, it's going to be very very hard to go back. It's like people who get hooked on increasingly degenerate pornography as they become accustomed to it and can no longer be satisfied without going further
You lose your personal expression that you had when you were thinking and writing on your own. No matter what anyone else thought about your output, or if it was totally accurate at the end of the day, it was YOURS, you created it yourself. That's worth something. I'd say it's worth a lot. Nobody else created the Jewish Central Banker Cinematic Universe or whatever you want to call it (not making fun). It's yours. Don't give that up, imo. |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 1:16 PM Author: cock of michael obama "may you read it and spittle out "THESE WORDS DON'T MEAN ANYTHING!" "YOU'RE USING LLMS THE WRONG WAY!!!" in good health"
Yes! There it is! I was a little disappointed you avoided it in the initial response. Tyft.
|
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 12:40 PM Author: reracination is based it's not a categorical difference. it's a preferential inclusion or exclusion of empirical referent in the signifier (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49191921) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2025 3:32 PM Author: cock of michael obama (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763290&forum_id=2),#49192250) |