The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| boyish sickened queen of the night | 01/06/26 | | Bipolar stirring pistol | 01/06/26 | | lascivious unhinged gaming laptop immigrant | 01/06/26 | | Bipolar stirring pistol | 01/06/26 | | lascivious unhinged gaming laptop immigrant | 01/06/26 | | Bipolar stirring pistol | 01/06/26 | | boyish sickened queen of the night | 01/06/26 | | Bipolar stirring pistol | 01/06/26 | | boyish sickened queen of the night | 01/06/26 | | Fragrant slimy stage | 01/07/26 | | unholy mahogany shrine sweet tailpipe | 01/06/26 | | Adventurous address legend | 01/06/26 | | lascivious unhinged gaming laptop immigrant | 01/06/26 | | Glittery gas station | 01/06/26 | | lascivious unhinged gaming laptop immigrant | 01/06/26 | | Grizzly locus | 01/06/26 | | beta razzle-dazzle forum water buffalo | 01/06/26 | | Cordovan brunch | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Bipolar stirring pistol
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2),#49568134) |
|
|