The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Provocative doobsian state | 01/06/26 | | Confused spot | 01/06/26 | | electric internet-worthy bbw | 01/06/26 | | Confused spot | 01/06/26 | | electric internet-worthy bbw | 01/06/26 | | Confused spot | 01/06/26 | | Provocative doobsian state | 01/06/26 | | Confused spot | 01/06/26 | | Provocative doobsian state | 01/06/26 | | multi-colored ratface | 01/07/26 | | cruel-hearted cocky boltzmann | 01/06/26 | | irradiated swollen lettuce | 01/06/26 | | electric internet-worthy bbw | 01/06/26 | | mint kitty cat plaza | 01/06/26 | | electric internet-worthy bbw | 01/06/26 | | excitant crackhouse | 01/06/26 | | Razzmatazz water buffalo forum | 01/06/26 | | Soul-stirring grizzly electric furnace | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Confused spot
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2),#49568134) |
|
|