The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
99.9999% of humanity does know the difference b/w tactical and strategic nukes
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 04/07/26 |
| actual white person with a turtleneck and MacBook | 04/07/26 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 04/07/26 |
| Trust If Aryan | 04/07/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 7th, 2026 3:02 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK all the ZOMG TRUMP MIGHT USE TACTICAL NUKES bullshit is getting tiresome. He's probably already used several to no avail. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5854633&forum_id=2),#49800816) |
Date: April 7th, 2026 3:10 PM Author: actual white person with a turtleneck and MacBook whats the difference (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5854633&forum_id=2),#49800849) |
 |
Date: April 7th, 2026 4:38 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK tactical nukes are low yield and are not intended to be decisive in a conflict. You couldn't use tactical nukes to wipe out population centers. To kill more than a few hundred people you'd have to drop one on a densely crowded mall or airport or something.
Strategic nukes are meant to make a country uninhabitable. In 1945, the shock-and-awe effect was enough to make Japan capitulate, but after the Soviets got the bomb we reasoned that that they would never surrender just because they got nuked. They would just eat the nukes and never surrender. So strategic nukes got bigger and bigger, the idea being that we'd just glass the place and destroy everything. |
|
Date: April 7th, 2026 4:57 PM Author: Trust If Aryan now do fission vs fusion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5854633&forum_id=2),#49801265) |