XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| wine dopamine | 07/04/25 | | Boyish walnut office | 07/04/25 | | abnormal nursing home roast beef | 07/04/25 | | vivacious green abode | 07/04/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/04/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/04/25 | | Boyish walnut office | 07/04/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/04/25 | | Boyish walnut office | 07/04/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/04/25 | | Boyish walnut office | 07/05/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/05/25 | | hilarious station | 07/05/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/06/25 | | hilarious station | 07/05/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/05/25 | | hilarious station | 07/06/25 | | Henna hot milk theater | 07/06/25 | | Idiotic Hairy Legs Ladyboy | 07/05/25 | | galvanic kitchen | 07/06/25 | | Idiotic Hairy Legs Ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Idiotic Hairy Legs Ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Bronze fiercely-loyal space lettuce | 07/05/25 | | Histrionic institution | 07/06/25 | | Slimy hall jew | 07/05/25 | | Hyperventilating locus | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Cordovan forum sneaky criminal | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Stirring trump supporter legal warrant | 07/06/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/06/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/06/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/06/25 | | Henna hot milk theater | 07/06/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/06/25 | | galvanic kitchen | 07/06/25 | | wine dopamine | 07/06/25 | | Cordovan forum sneaky criminal | 07/06/25 | | Histrionic institution | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Arousing Library Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Apoplectic naked black woman brethren | 07/06/25 | | Bespoke theater stage | 07/06/25 | | frisky school famous landscape painting | 07/06/25 | | Bespoke theater stage | 07/06/25 | | trip pervert | 07/06/25 | | Idiotic Hairy Legs Ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | Razzmatazz dark multi-billionaire | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Poppy Arousing Library Jewess
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2),#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Poppy Arousing Library Jewess
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2),#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Poppy Arousing Library Jewess
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2),#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Poppy Arousing Library Jewess
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2),#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Hyperventilating locus
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2),#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Henna hot milk theater
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2),#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Histrionic institution
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2),#49076800) |
|
|