The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SCOTUS denies Indiana Felon Pauper Status, Jackson Dissents
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 20th, 2026 1:28 PM Author: apoplectic feces Maybe Posner can pay his fees
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012026zor_bpm1.pdf
Page 10 |
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:14 PM Author: vivacious church private investor >Martin’s circumstances lent this Court a useful shorthand: When we bar indigent litigants from filing any future in forma pauperis petitions, we now say that we are “Martinizing” them
can rach NSAM-ize NSAM from poasting? |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:16 PM Author: vivacious church private investor where is jackson wrong? seems a bit much for prisoners to be banned forever after 5-6 petitions, esp if there are changes in the law etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824301&forum_id=2),#49603860) |
 |
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:18 PM Author: Dull Bearded Stage counterpoint: fuck these scumbags. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824301&forum_id=2),#49603863) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:19 PM Author: vivacious church private investor countercounterpoint: why does the scotus require 40 paper copies of every filing, such that the government probably uses taxpayer shekels to print out their filings 40x until theyre banned? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824301&forum_id=2),#49603869) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:20 PM Author: Dull Bearded Stage yeah, fair. fuck those scumbags too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824301&forum_id=2),#49603871) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:29 PM Author: mint rough-skinned box office part of having a decent democracy is being able to tolerate some abuse of the court system by inmates. so at some point you can deem him a vexatious litigant or whatever, but you should waive costs because of our commitment to the First Amendment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824301&forum_id=2),#49603882) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: vivacious church private investor 5-6 shitpapers doesnt seem enough to deem someone a vexatious litigant. we endure 100s of shitthreads by mentally ill spammers each day. these scotusfags can deal.
these shitpetitions can easily be denied in one sentence orders. it's not like some trial court lawsuit that actually has to be litigated. |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:52 PM Author: mint rough-skinned box office and don't they have special clerks for these post-conviction briefs? just stamped "denied" after a short read. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824301&forum_id=2),#49603959) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:59 PM Author: vivacious church private investor i'm comparing it to some trial court shitpaper, where the government has to respond, the court has to issue a ruling, etc.
for these scotus petitions, the govt doesnt need to respond and the court doesnt even need an individual order. they just list the case on the list of weekly orders as denies |
|
Date: January 20th, 2026 2:23 PM Author: pontificating sneaky criminal stock car Eh. In the unlikely event he as an actually meritorious claim someday, non-profits will be tripping over themselves to represent him. They wouldn't have to pay the backfines, just the pennies for the current one. To the extent he suffers at all from this, it's his own fault. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824301&forum_id=2),#49603876) |