many "illegal immigrants" need to go asap
| bearded purple box office | 06/07/25 | | Crystalline medicated house | 06/07/25 | | Boyish goyim | 06/07/25 | | bearded purple box office | 06/07/25 | | gay address | 06/07/25 | | bearded purple box office | 06/07/25 | | motley background story | 06/07/25 | | Crystalline medicated house | 06/07/25 | | Olive metal piazza juggernaut | 06/07/25 | | Vibrant International Law Enforcement Agency Stag Film | 06/07/25 | | motley background story | 06/07/25 | | thriller corn cake | 06/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 7th, 2025 7:45 PM Author: bearded purple box office
i actually quite like homan and think him and elon were bright spots in the admin. he seems professional and has no enthusiasm for the work, which is appropriate
i don't want mass crackdowns on non-violent illegals nor do i want the state to terrorize communities of predominantly illegal immigrants because they're valuable parts of the economy too atm. the state needs to confront some of these major agribusiness concerns on the topic of why they're pulling in these workers year after year and bring the nuts and bolts of the economic situation there out into the light; ignorance is killing the public's perception of the intersection between immigration and affordability of goods
but it would be good to remind "sanctuary cities" that they need to be judicious about who they provide sanctuary to and that they really shouldn't be valorizing "refugees" "migrants" over actual citizens paying in to the social systems. this may seem lassiez-faire but i think that if bipartisan discourse improves and democrats are forced to really look at some of the social and economic costs involved in their immigration policies, they're going to come back around to positions closer to the center-right on the matter.
libs need to make up their minds on that one; are we going to have better social safety nets and cheaper healthcare, at the expense of curbing migration? or are we going to continue to have open borders while disintegrating the character of the native population and lowering the quality of social services provided to actual americans with generational "pay-ins" to the federal pot?
the choice seems obvious to me but this is one of those parts of the left platform previously that made very little sense and came across as juvenile. i also think that millennial leftists were organically growing out of it anyway before the political war went "hot"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734693&forum_id=2)#48995506) |
|
|