The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why are so many scientists atheist?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:16 AM Author: Contagious digit ratio or when pressed, claim agnostic. what do they know that we dont know? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896012) |
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:17 AM Author: Adulterous cream market sweet tailpipe transcendent definitions of God are inherently vague and without observable/attributable effects (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896014) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:20 AM Author: Submissive rehab 1. Because one wrong move and they’re Ruined. They must follow ALL Rules exactly, even unwritten ones or else people will be like, “what a joke.” If you aren’t sufficiently Liberal then no one will fund your research imo
2. Bc they’re supposed to assume something doesn’t exist if they can’t prove it exists.
3. Bc they aren’t able to look beyond their “job training,” bc they’re proles
4. Because half of them are Losers who bombed the MCAT or Match Day or whatever |
 |
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:27 PM Author: splenetic gunner wagecucks Your God can’t save Sony champ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896275) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:28 AM Author: Submissive rehab https://ideology.us/kaczynski/c11.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896043) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:34 AM Author: indigo corner weed whacker materialism and materialists are gay, even when focused on the highest levels of cosmology (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896053) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:55 AM Author: sooty menage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896078) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:45 AM Author: Drab factory reset button I dont know that I understand what atheism is, or how one can "be atheist".
Rejecting Roman Catholicism, fine. Or rejecting claims about a personal God, sure. Thinking some questions are still unanswered, or even that some questions will probably never be answerable, okay.
But confronting these questions, e.g.
- I have consciousness and a personal self, that emerged some time in my life that I do not remember. How and why and from where and for what?
- I see certain things come to be and then cease to be. How did *anything* come to be, and when, and why, and for what?
- How can I not even imagine an alternative to the universe being, given that there most likely was a state affairs without it? Or, alternatively, if it just always was, how the fuck does that work?
Confronting these with a fixed, certain and universal claim: THERE IS NO GOD AND I KNOW IT.
lmao. Seems like the most retarded and immature creed ever, arrived at purely to annoy or flip the bird, with zero justification at all.
One either assents to some kind of religious faith, or one does not and holds the questions unanswered. There is no "atheism" apart from performative adolescence |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:31 PM Author: french violet indian lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896288) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:57 PM Author: bearded striped hyena Your definition of atheist is a bit strict. It often refers more broadly to those who lack god-belief, not just those who affirmatively assert god non-existence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896366) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2025 8:09 AM Author: Drab factory reset button perhaps. i think it would be most helpful to use "atheism" as a mode, i.e. I am doing this experiment atheistically, or not employing any god-belief I may or may not have
but atheists are not neutral in practice, they are hostile. they encounter the questions I posed above, as everyone must, and then claim that god-answerers have the burden of proof. But god-answerers do not. The questions have the burden. They can be engaged in these ways:
1. Ignored 2. Answered with reference to a "god" agent 3. Determined to be unanswered, or unanswerable 4. answered foreclosing "god"
atheists are not compelled by 2, and then say 2 people have all the burden, so default is 4
its bad logic, bad thinking, and juvenile in its polemic
honest doubters should rest at 3, and this is in no way "atheism" by any meaningful def |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 9:51 PM Author: Stimulating lettuce all of this seems to adhere to some faith in linearity (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48897732) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:46 AM Author: aromatic honey-headed bawdyhouse multi-billionaire i would think agnosticism is the default sciencemo religious stance. you can't disprove god any more than you can prove him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896066) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:54 AM Author: sooty menage Big big difference between "athiests" who deny the existence of God outright (midwit total retards) and "atheists" who believe in God but don't subscribe to any particular popular religion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896077) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 11:35 AM Author: Contagious digit ratio God as in the benovolent loving God that cares for his children, or the force that created everything. Scientists dont believe in the loving God being that actively gives a shit about humans, but they dont deny something created everything. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896168) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 11:54 AM Author: Submissive rehab Atheists don’t believe in god you idiot. You’re talking about Deists. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896204) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:08 PM Author: sooty menage I'm aware of the distinction, but when people (including OP) use the term "atheist," they don't use it in this way. They just mean 'someone who isn't religious' (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896237) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2025 10:07 AM Author: Submissive rehab You don’t know that and to assert otherwise is intellectual dishonesty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48898556) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 11:57 AM Author: Deep Chrome Brunch Keepsake Machete You don’t have to be a scientist to see that all religion is manmade fiction intended to serve a societal purpose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896211) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:16 PM Author: cracking yellow sandwich the problem is theres no other shorthand way to say this irl without coming off as edgy and aloof. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896249) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:22 PM Author: Deep Chrome Brunch Keepsake Machete Most people don’t care about that anymore. Richard Dawkins won the war on religion. Far fewer people in America identify as religious after The God Delusion was published, and religions now have far less power. Check out this graph (God Delusion published in 2006):
Religiousmos fucked with the wrong atheist and he destroyed them and everything they care about as a result |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:24 PM Author: sooty menage Wew lad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896267) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2025 12:07 PM Author: Comical demanding alpha Most people don’t know who the fuck Richard Dawkins is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48898835) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:24 PM Author: beady-eyed garnet hunting ground resort “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.”
— Werner Heisenberg
https://billionyearoldcarbon.substack.com/p/uncertainty-principle |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 12:44 PM Author: burgundy faggotry Because they don’t poast. If they had an XO account and saw how God punishes benzo they’d be believers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48896327) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 1:21 PM Author: Exhilarant party of the first part Because Atheists become scientists to try to understand.
Science does not cause atheism, atheism makes one more likely to be a scientist. |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 5:03 PM Author: Mind-boggling center goal in life religion is for the feeble mind clinging to hoap (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48897078) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2025 12:04 PM Author: Deep Chrome Brunch Keepsake Machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48898823) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:00 PM Author: Fuchsia scourge upon the earth senate My gut take is that atheists are more likely to become scientists in the first place, but the single most hardcore atheist I know off the top of my head became a successful STEM prof at Berkeley or some place like that before he became an author. I forget what exactly he did but it was serious high level academic shit:
https://x.com/chediak?t=IeExOv5DwdW5a_HvJAjjGw&s=09
He's a 190 dood BTW. One of the greatest Americans of all time among Gen X. |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:04 PM Author: Fuchsia scourge upon the earth senate Ok he went there at least. I believe he got a PhD there.
https://x.com/chediak/status/1916180431122346223?t=KntRZTYnE3Evb4MdGv_2sg&s=19 |
|
Date: May 1st, 2025 10:32 PM Author: pea-brained unhinged gay wizard most are autistic and people with autism don't really have souls (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719226&forum_id=2)#48897798) |