You’re so different from the Jews you complain about 24/7!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48980875)

Not expecting to hear from you any further so I hope you have a nice day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48980883)

Short answer: I hope all of you, on all sides, go back to where you came from, preferably in bags.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48980891)

Doxxers get the rope no exceptions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48981784)

this guy is upset I doxxed a Jewish pedophile

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982048)

he didn't do shit. he's a warm temp iq huckster. i get that you're juicing him up to encourage him to keep on after the joos but he actually hurts your cause. you don't want these fucking retards being the face of antizionism.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982109)

regarding that thread i don't know whether karl "deserves credit" for doxxing the pedophile, that's such a gay thing lawyers do to chip away at People Actually Doing Things to assuage their own fragile self-esteem. who cares if he deserves credit, he was at least somewhat involved in a good thing happening and that's more than pretty much any of us can say here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982170)

1) i didn't say *he* was. *he's* not the fact of anything except autistic closet cases. what i'm saying is venerating people *LIKE HIM* is ultimately bad for you because it makes antizionists look like retards.

2) fuck off with the "chipping away" shit. no, i'd be very happy to give someone credit for moving the needle ever so slightly. as individuals most of us can't do much and i applaud people that do *anything*. but karl keeps saying shit like "he put him away" when he did fucking nothing. it's bullshit. you might as well take credit for trump because you poasted support on xoxo.

you're just juicing him up because you hate kikes but if you thought for two seconds about it you'd want karlstack as far away from antizionism as possible. he's a caricature and kikes would love to (in fact already have!) place him front and center.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982244)

Paralegal M is a frustrated 2nd Gen immigrant who can’t handle that a different desert tribe lobbies the US government better than his desert tribe. He would do everything to all non-Muslims that Jews do to Palis if he had the chance.

Both have no principles or honor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982270)

Even if that were true the supremacy of Jewish power and their malice towards everyone else is a reality. With Muslims in America you are bringing up a hypothetical.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982537)

1. i don't like him because he's antizionist. there is no shortage of people reading the tea leaves these days and declaring support for Palestine. i like him because what he wrote today required courage as it put him directly in the crosshairs of his previous support base, AND it was actually a really good, well-researched piece. not seeing the problem, wasn't "venerating" the guy or putting him on a pedestal above others of like mind and persuasion.

2. is he a little desperate for cash and attention? seems like it, but why do you care? many journalists and entrepreneurs of all types are like this. he's trying to find his way. and he educated many people today on what's going on in a way unlike nobody i've seen. why not support him for doing that?

3. is he the sharpest person here? probably not but you and i aren't either. he's still a pretty good communicator and if he changes his mind on this issue again no one will really care, he's still basically an unknown niche internet figure. go touch grass

4. is he self-promoting with the putting him away stuff? yah sure, are you unfamiliar with how the world works in 2025? again, he's trying to maek it and while it's off-putting to you and me it's still a smart thing to do in the real world. he did write a researched piece on a niche, unknown pedophile (can't compare him to trump) and it seems like it was cited in some type of court case. who cares if he doesn't deserve full credit? what is breaking him down doing for you? it's a really feminine and lame lawyer trait and it reflects poorly on you my guy

kikes put him front and center when he was still supporting them. they are extremely dumb and gullible, they will distance themselves from him now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982356)

https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731310&mc=80&forum_id=2#48973941

also not only doesnt "get" this place but he doesn't even try to.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982848)

by then he had deleted his twitter account to erase evidence of his plagiarism and created the current one he's using.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982933)

its deeply ironic that plagiarism is his whole bag considering the outright plagerism you mentioned and plagerism-lite shit like implying he did the investigating rather than just print stuff that was fed to him.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732537&forum_id=2)#48982970)