Or is it mass looting, arson and vandalism requiring deployment of the National Guard and Marines?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736219&forum_id=2)#49005611)

was january 6 a handful of retards milling about the capital or something that warranted deployment of the national guard?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736219&forum_id=2)#49005621)

EDIT: and yes, i think they are mutually exclusive. Minimizing the scope of the protest/riot to benefit your political party while simultaneously exaggerating it to demonize the other party is quite literally having your cake and eating it too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736219&forum_id=2)#49005629)

my point is that something can be both a small niche uproar and overwhelm local LE and warrant deployment of the national guard. local LE rarely has the resources to do anything but everyday LE. a few hundred people can overwhelm them, and that's exactly why we have national guard reservists. that doesn't mean that a couple hundred people going buckwild is indicative of something super significant (i.e. a "big deal.").

especially in LA's case where the local and state governments are sympathetic to the rioters and might not employ LE enthusiastically.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736219&forum_id=2)#49005761)

sanctuary cities cannot be trusted with this stuff

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736219&forum_id=2)#49005903)

The same libs: Look what is happening on Trump's watch!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736219&forum_id=2)#49005620)