still, potentially fake jeebus was right about (((you people)))

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49106437)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49106513)

and Clement quoted the NT before 100AD

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49106566)

https://ehrmanblog.org/why-date-the-gospels-after-70-ce/

get a load of this bias:

"New Testament scholars are virtually unified in thinking that the Gospels of the New Testament began to appear after 70 CE. The major exceptions are conservative evangelicals who often date them earlier. One can understand why: they typically maintain that the Gospels of Matthew and John were written by disciples of Jesus and it seems implausible that they would still be alive toward the end of the first century (especially given live expectancies in antiquity)."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49106910)

The more you look into it the crazier it is to let ur children essentially practice Judaism lite and how most of ur past was literally defaced by these yids

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49108246)

those dastardly jews always playing the long game!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49109517)

Whats more they were entirely convinced the world would end and Jesus would return within their lives. No reason to write shit down.

Paul, within a few decades, starting writing scholarship. Around that time, a bit later, compilers started to compile stories into Gospels. Within 100 years it was all pretty much done. It was like WW2 writing today. Hardly ancient history and you can find some olds who saw it as adults, and many crowds of their children who were there and heard about it their whole lives.

Idgaf if you reject the Gospel of Christ, but those are the facts

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49108291)

and he was using sources written earlier than him, obv.

Id say there were probably pen-to-paper gospel accounts by the 50s or 60s. Mark's was definitive and survived

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49108306)

they just weren't compiled. also the real question about veracity comes from the rewrites/edits/codifications under the roman imperial state and this ends up presenting a few different issues mostly relating to possible ideological contagion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751078&forum_id=2)#49108305)