The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
5-10 years... "biglawyers" = lamplighters out of work
| umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid | 07/18/25 |
| at-the-ready supple boltzmann | 07/18/25 |
| umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid | 07/18/25 |
| Twinkling costumed field patrolman | 07/18/25 |
| umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid | 07/18/25 |
| Soul-stirring dull national international law enforcement agency | 07/18/25 |
| laughsome swollen gaming laptop | 07/18/25 |
| Galvanic prole | 07/18/25 |
| lake spot newt | 07/18/25 |
| Galvanic prole | 07/18/25 |
| insecure hell | 07/18/25 |
| lake spot newt | 07/18/25 |
| Mildly autistic tan locale | 07/19/25 |
| Impertinent Chestnut Set | 07/18/25 |
| razzle dragon locus | 07/18/25 |
| umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid | 07/18/25 |
| alcoholic learning disabled step-uncle's house crotch | 07/18/25 |
| Mentally Impaired Maize Juggernaut | 07/18/25 |
| umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid | 07/18/25 |
| bearded opaque menage | 07/18/25 |
| Vengeful magenta death wish | 07/18/25 |
| rusted parlour weed whacker | 07/18/25 |
| Vengeful magenta death wish | 07/18/25 |
| rusted parlour weed whacker | 07/18/25 |
| rusted parlour weed whacker | 07/18/25 |
| rusted parlour weed whacker | 07/18/25 |
| Vengeful magenta death wish | 07/18/25 |
| cocky abode | 07/18/25 |
| rusted parlour weed whacker | 07/19/25 |
| dun arousing philosopher-king | 07/19/25 |
| rusted parlour weed whacker | 07/19/25 |
| Lemon Digit Ratio Box Office | 07/18/25 |
| Fuchsia native lettuce | 07/19/25 |
| mauve dilemma karate | 07/18/25 |
| Coral Volcanic Crater | 07/18/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 18th, 2025 4:16 AM Author: umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111109) |
 |
Date: July 18th, 2025 4:23 AM Author: at-the-ready supple boltzmann God willing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111113) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 4:53 AM Author: umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid Inshallah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111128) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 5:46 PM Author: Twinkling costumed field patrolman (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49112809) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:49 PM Author: umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49113496) |
Date: July 18th, 2025 4:53 AM Author: Soul-stirring dull national international law enforcement agency nickel endimed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111131) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 6:33 AM Author: laughsome swollen gaming laptop What happens next though?
Clearly we still have lawyers and law firms, but perhaps the firm headcount drops to 10% the current headcount, and AI/software picks up the slack.
In that world, is the firm owned by just a handful of partners? Do law firms start to act like lean software companies? When does a U.S. firm IPO?
The counterpoint btw is that we just do a lot more work that was prohibitively expensive before. For example, I probably see 25+ cease and desist letters for every lawsuit, because letters cost $5-10k and lawsuits cost $100k to initiate and $5M+ to litigate through summary judgment. If cost of litigation drops [80%] people may file many more lawsuits. There could be an analogous dynamic on the corporate/business side. |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:00 AM Author: Galvanic prole Interesting point. Here in shitlaw, I have people calling me virtually every day because their "friend" cheated them out of $300 or something. I tell them it doesn't make financial sense to pursue that and they start crying. There's a big untapped market out there for adjudicating squabbles among proles. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111342) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:28 AM Author: lake spot newt What is the bulk of your business (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111384) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:43 AM Author: Galvanic prole The single biggest area is rural real estate law. Evictions, construction disputes, zoning issues. Tons of lawsuits over exactly who owns some piece of land, often with a rotting mobile home sitting on it. Average client expenditure is about $3000, but that varies wildly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111405) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:54 AM Author: insecure hell lol 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111430) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:15 AM Author: lake spot newt 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111461) |
|
Date: July 19th, 2025 7:10 AM Author: Mildly autistic tan locale (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49113902) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:19 AM Author: Impertinent Chestnut Set prole squabbles, llp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111464) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:46 AM Author: razzle dragon locus UBI is a must and these gains in income (from LLM technologies)for the technologists or corporations replacing people with chatbots needs to be scrutinized and tracked ASAP to start determining the amount owed to the american citizenry it's critical |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:50 PM Author: umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49113498) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:56 PM Author: alcoholic learning disabled step-uncle's house crotch how about we just have billionaires who "lord" over us and poors who you could say serve or maybe "serf" them and then anyone who doesn't go along with this gets to die (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49113524) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:47 AM Author: Mentally Impaired Maize Juggernaut Don't count on a 10 year horizon. Get your retirement money as soon as you fucking can (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111417) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:50 PM Author: umber 180 fortuitous meteor hominid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49113499) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:50 AM Author: bearded opaque menage I’ve used Lexis and westlaw’s AI. Still not impressed. It helps, it certainly makes us more productive, but major reductions in headcount? Also, everyone keeps saying wait another year. But we’re a couple of years in and the capabilities (at least as applied to law) seem about the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111420) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:57 AM Author: Vengeful magenta death wish I'm not sure what sort of tools biglaw is using, but AI capabilities have skyrocketed over the past two years and there's no reason that wouldn't apply to law if it applies subjects that are at least as complex. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111435) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:33 AM Author: rusted parlour weed whacker It’s pretty crap right now and often in law there’s no objectively correct answer unlike coding or whatever. Here’s a better explanation why law is harder to master for AI than coding.
Coding is governed by strict syntax and deterministic rules. A given input in a programming language will always produce the same output if the code is correct. • Legal analysis involves ambiguous language, conflicting authorities, policy tradeoffs, and context-sensitive reasoning—skills that require human judgment and real-world understanding.
AI has been trained on massive open-source code repositories like GitHub, with clear labels, documentation, and results. This data is abundant, consistent, and high-quality. • Legal data is more fragmented: • Case law is often behind paywalls. • Court decisions may be long, inconsistent, or involve complex procedural postures. • Outcomes are not always “correct” or universally agreed upon.
|
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:34 AM Author: Vengeful magenta death wish Yeah I think this is horseshit cope tbh. Models like o3 pro can absolutely handle textual nuance and complex questions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111500) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:44 AM Author: rusted parlour weed whacker It pushes out shit legal work product riddled with hallucinations or misstatements of the law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111526) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 11:24 AM Author: rusted parlour weed whacker Also, the law isn’t just pure logic or even complex logic, unlike coding, there’s no single correct answer to the important questions that get litigated, the legal background is often contradictory and nuanced so you can’t just train it easily. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111634) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 12:04 PM Author: rusted parlour weed whacker Coping fag hello (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111710) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 12:10 PM Author: Vengeful magenta death wish You're just wrong about AI capabilities and AI's ability to generate responses when there isn't an objectively correct answer, there isn't much else to say. If anything law being subjective bullshit will make it easier to automate. When I deal with ai skeptics these days I mostly just wait for reality to prove them wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111715) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 5:46 PM Author: cocky abode Not only that but it basically only has to be good enough to replace paralegals and juniors to have an enormous impact, which it pretty much already has (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49112807) |
|
Date: July 19th, 2025 7:23 AM Author: rusted parlour weed whacker Why don’t you explain why I’m wrong instead of saying “I’m just wrong” with no explanation? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49113912) |
|
Date: July 19th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: dun arousing philosopher-king Just respond to chatgpt and ask it for the pro-legal AI argument to the answer it just gave you
(delete the em dash next time you retard) |
|
Date: July 19th, 2025 2:45 PM Author: rusted parlour weed whacker Current reality supports the anti-AI argument. AI law products are pretty shit for any complex practice.
No doubt that people who rely on making money through teams of 20 paralegals filling out forms and doing rote tasks will change a lot but automating such repetitive thoughtless tasks is entirely different than writing a compelling brief based on nuanced and complex facts in an uncertain area of law.
It most likely will be similar to how word processing eliminated a lot of support positions. |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 9:58 AM Author: Lemon Digit Ratio Box Office OP also thought Excel would eliminate accountants (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111438) |
|
Date: July 19th, 2025 1:33 AM Author: Fuchsia native lettuce (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49113713) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 10:23 AM Author: mauve dilemma karate I wish. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111468) |
|
Date: July 18th, 2025 12:24 PM Author: Coral Volcanic Crater Its barely any better than a google search was 6 years ago. Add on top that people using it are dumber. All AI is going to do is maybe help the few smart people left do stuff (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5751717&forum_id=2)#49111741) |