Step 2: you can tell the difference because real girls suck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979695)

What I imagine will happen is that content will be signed at time of creation. Apple will probably offer this as a service on iPhones

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979742)

Re. Apple's service you concoct. Eventually there will be a workaround for this as well.

Where this is all heading is that the methods to verify Real over AI will get increasingly complicated, while its benefits get vanishingly small, that it will not be available.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979753)

I wrote this below:

AI will be superior anyway, and to the extent that "IRL

flaws" are perceived as sexier or otherwise more desirable, AI will imitate them sufficiently to fool you. Ultimately, your AI-addled brain will not be able to recall the hallmarks of "real girls"- nevermind that most zoomers and younger already are unfamiliar enough with women to understand these flaws and irregularities of real-life sexual interaction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979813)

Legacy porn from the pre-AI era will become more valued (this is already what’s happened among CP freaks: almost all child porn is ancient; simulated CP is legal, but the freaks have no interest in it).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979746)

The same will happen with job applications (as another poaster has pointed out is already happening at his firm and the resumes thay are sent).

And eventually the same will happen with all forms of electronic communication. It will all, all go away. Everything will go back to IRL and frankly the internet will cease to be.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979760)

Social media in particular will be the “yeah, I wore an olive green polyester leisure suit with 17-in. diameter bell bottoms back in the 70s… we all did” of our generation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979767)

Onlyfans will survive because its real girls, girl next door, innocent shit that the chicks at least act like they enjoy doing. Take Livvy Dunne - she's hugely popular not because she's some perfect model - she's popular because she's an athlete with a cute personality who talks like a real college girl.

AI is going to end porn. Are guys going to want to watch some porn star fake orgasm with some sketchy looking guy she met 5 minutes ago? Or are they going to put on their VR headseat and say "make a video of Hermione in her Hogswarts uniform telling me that i have a bigger dick than my ex's new boyfriend"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979763)

Again. You're not looking at two options in front of you where you click one button for Real Girls and one button for AI Girls.

You're looking at one button for AI Girls and one button for "Girl who says she's real but you have no fucking clue if she is or isn't."

AI will be superior anyway, and to the extent that "IRL flaws" are perceived as sexier or otherwise more desirable, AI will imitate them sufficiently to fool you. Ultimately, your AI-addled brain will not be able to recall the hallmarks of "real girls"- nevermind that most zoomers and younger already are unfamiliar enough with women to understand these flaws and irregularities of real-life sexual interaction.

The question is, what systems will AI and AI-caused "Reality Skepticism" not affect? What will be left after all this? I'm suggesting that technology will completely cannibalize itself, and I'm far from the first or smartest person to have said this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979769)

Also what is your opinion? Your two poasts above itt seem to go different ways.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979841)

But I do think your point about how facsimile tech becoming indistinguishable from genuine tech will largely just render the genuine tech useless. This may end up being the solution to the surveillance state: no one will give a fuck about a network of street cameras watching you go from the scene of the crime back to your apartment when defense counsel can mock up identical videos of the case agent, judge, and juror #4 committing the crime and doing the exact same return route.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2)#48979904)