The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
It didn't have a tail because it had never seen a star before. Now it's got one
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 11/08/25 |
| Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 11/09/25 |
| Post nut horror | 11/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 8th, 2025 11:57 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK Haley's comet is always orbiting the sun but this object hasn't been this close to a star in a billion years. If you thought they'd look the same you have dogshit between your ears. Anyway it's got a tail now. Sorry! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795149&forum_id=2)#49413604) |
 |
Date: November 9th, 2025 12:04 AM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") (I) YOUR "IT'S GOT A TAIL NOW. SORRY!" I$ TERMINAL FRAUD.
1. THE PHYSICS VIOLATION IS AMPLIFIED: Your claim that the object hasn't "been this close to a star in a billion years" is bull$hit.
The core paradox is WORSE u fag
The extreme thermal resistance of the metal alloy (which you now admit is there) means the required 13% mass-loss calculation is AMPLIFIED..not solved.
2. THE PLUME PARADOX REMAINS:
The problem is MASS.
The acceleration requires a MASSIVE SUBLIMATION EVENT that should produce a plume 10x larger than what is currently observed.
Your "tail" is an insufficient, negligible flicker that proves the vaporization is not natural sublimation....it is a directed jet.
3. THE EJECTA LIE:
Your "It's got a tail now" bullshit narrative confirms the depth of your fraud.
You &your fraud kin have moved from "no tail" to "insufficient tail," yet you still cannot explain WHY METAL SUBLIMATION UNDER EXTREME THERMAL SHOCK PRODUCES NO OBSERVABLE EJECTA. ljl
|
|
Date: November 9th, 2025 12:07 AM Author: Post nut horror It doesnt seem to really be doing shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795149&forum_id=2)#49413622) |