but I also thought TSINAH was bragging about getting a 5 figure check in the Discover action so I assumed there was a settlement for nuisance value.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47574859)

it's entirely possible there was no settlement, but who knows.

if this hearing is related to the discover case, then ZZZ is probably in for a healthy buttfucking. based on what i know about the case (which i read in the thread about the first hearing), the court didn't grand summary judgment but told discover that she would do so if they could prove that TSINAH made a payment within the SOL period for debt collection. my guess is that they have supplemented their MSJ with that evidence and asked for another hearing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47574879)

https://i.imgur.com/6MjD96z.png

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47575023)

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47575054)

my theory is that he's like an incredibly autistic rainman-like idiot savant. either that or he got very lucky or had some cognitive injury. i mean, it's beyond dispute he's retarded and one of the dumbest poasters here. getting a 180 wouldn't change that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47574952)

btw it pays to discover

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47575031)

also why are the apostrophes after plaintiffs and attorneys? are their multiple plaintiffs? multiple attorneys? jfc zzz you are dumb as a fucking rock lmao. can't even use proper punctuation in a one page proposed order. wow!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47576586)

It's easy to mock the biglaw faggotry culture of perfectionism, but this is why. These simple mistakes make ZZZ look even more preposterous than this cause of action already does.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47577373)

but when you're submitting a one page proposed order fucking up shit like that does just make you look like an idiot. and for good reason. candy ride/zzz is also getting mocked here about it. at the very least i'd do a quick once over to avoid being teased here. that this short, simple thing contained several errors is likely because of stupidity, not lack of care.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47577383)

REQUEST NO. 18: Admit that you spoke with a Discover representative regarding the Account on or about May 8, 2020 via telephone.

REQUEST NO. 19: Admit that you spoke with a Discover representative regarding the Account on or about August 31, 2020 via telephone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47585283)

tsinah, i remember during your eviction ordeal i warned you about doing this type of shit while you were seeking to be admitted in another state. i assume you admission remains pending in part because of this stuff. i don't bear you any malice and i'm not bringing this up to embarrass you -- but you really need to reconsider the path you're on if you plan to continue practicing law. i've volunteered in my state's disciplinary system and this type of stuff is taken very seriously. it's really hard to get disbarred but it's really easy to run into problems getting admitted. considering you're already a licensed attorney and getting admitted into a new state is typically a lay-up, the fact it isn't happened yet (i assume) is very concerning. continuing to press with litigation like this is very dangerous. if you do seek to get admitted they will look for evidence of rehabilitation, so the longer you press it the longer you'll likely be waiting.

i can't imagine you actually think that this has merit. and personally i support fucking over finance companies with vexatious litigation. but not at the risk to your reputation and career.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47585350)

i doubt DISCOVER would bother trying to fuck with his license. this is some shitcase and they will probably just deal with it and move on. although who knows whether ZZZ has engaged in RT-esque tactics that have enraged discover's attys.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47585362)

my first thought was that perhaps you get sanctions against a plaintiff-attorney who isn't representing himself if there is a high enough bar that they knew or should have known that the litigation was frivolous? idk. but the fact they're even asking at all is concerning. i would not be surprised if discover filed bar complaints against zzz and tsinah. this is ridiculous. there is notices of settlement offers on docket and zzz discussed it during the hearing. they should just take whatever they can and get the fuck out. this seems to be getting to the point where it's not just fun and games. considering they know rt and the consequences he's faced idk why they're pressing this. especially over such a small figure.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47585394)

And I have to say, step back and appreciate the absurdity of the situation. Discover is basically outright saying here they know TSINAH made a 2020 payment and what bank account it came out of. TSINAH swore that this never happened. One of these parties is about to suffer a massive credibility implosion and I seriously doubt the bank is bluffing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47585419)

like, this isn't fun and games. intentionally lying, and persisting with a lie, to a court, in avoidance of a legitimate debt, is really bad. like, actual disciplinary action bad. i've seen people get publicly disciplined for far, far less in my jx.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516373&forum_id=2)#47585446)