The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
7/23/25 AI thread - White House releases National AI Action Plan
| autoadmit main character | 07/23/25 |
| autoadmit main character | 07/23/25 |
| pitbulls eating your face in hell forever tp | 07/23/25 |
| autoadmit main character | 07/23/25 |
| Cyberpunk Age Pervert | 07/23/25 |
| autoadmit main character | 07/23/25 |
| autoadmit main character | 07/23/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 23rd, 2025 1:45 PM Author: autoadmit main character https://x.com/AndrewCurran_/status/1948025924475289923
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf
-anti-political bias mandate, as previously reported, is very good -lots of deregulation, very good -calling for open source models is interesting. this would be great but obviously the big players aren't going to be open source. i like that they are recognizing the importance of AI for small businesses though -there's actually some stuff about funding AI training and rapid retraining for workers displaced by AI. this is good in theory but i'm always skeptical of the government throwing monopoly money at things -robotics and drone focus is 180 and cr -using public resources to build curated datasets is 180 -pushing adoption of AI in government is great in theory but would involve firing millions of dead weight paycheck stealers which will never happen soooo yeah -the section about AI in department of defense is lol. maybe start by firing all the chinese and indian nationals first -***********LAWYER ALERT************ they're going to come up with "objective legal standards" to determine if evidence is deepfaked or not ljl good luck with that -tons of stuff about facilitating power grid expansion, all good -build more data centers and semiconductors here, sure -more stuff about training the american workforce to work in both AI directly and in building physical infrastructure for AI and power generation. this is actually really good -a bunch of stuff about AI and foreign policy aimed at Containing China. dude, half our AI scientists are chinese. this shit is just so silly man
all in all i think this is Great and it's a good sign that the government is taking the AI Age transition seriously |
Date: July 23rd, 2025 1:48 PM Author: autoadmit main character in other news: you can use AI within google sheets now. actually pretty sweet
https://x.com/balajis/status/1947663132450586849 |
 |
Date: July 23rd, 2025 2:49 PM Author: pitbulls eating your face in hell forever tp Why is it not integrated into Microsoft Word yet? I would have thought that would be one of the first and easiest use cases. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753751&forum_id=2)#49125115) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2025 3:55 PM Author: autoadmit main character because microsoft suuuuuuuuucccckkks and is infested and run by jeets
they have "copilot" but it sucks because, again, microsoft sucks |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2025 3:07 PM Author: Cyberpunk Age Pervert calling to open source models and hand our key strategic advantage to china is horrible. thankfully trump cannot force that, although he is selling out the country by letting china buy h20s (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753751&forum_id=2)#49125152) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2025 6:00 PM Author: autoadmit main character so true, MA-, i mean, man (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753751&forum_id=2)#49125633) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2025 8:26 PM Author: autoadmit main character https://x.com/AndrewCurran_/status/1948155312483291629
President Trump's comments on copyright at the AI Summit, slightly abridged.
'You can't be expected to have a successful Al program when every single article, book, or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for. ... It's not doable. And if you're going to try and do that, you're not going to have a successful program.
When a person reads a book or an article, you've gained great knowledge. That does not mean that you are violating copyright laws, or have to make deals with every content provider. China's not doing it.
You have to be able to play by the same set of rules. So when you read something, and when it goes into this vast intelligent machine we'll call it, you cannot expect to every time, every single time, say oh let's pay this one that much. It just doesn't work that way. Of course you can't copy or plagiarize an article. But if you read an article and learn from it, we have to allow AI to use that pool of knowledge without going through the complexity of contract negotiations, of which there would be thousands for every time we use AI.' |