The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Lawyers who disregard order of addressees in email
| Charismatic frozen lodge | 11/29/18 |
| aquamarine razzmatazz casino | 07/08/25 |
| flushed elite reading party | 07/08/25 |
| vibrant black tanning salon | 07/08/25 |
| flushed elite reading party | 07/08/25 |
| trip rigpig | 07/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 29th, 2018 4:58 PM Author: Charismatic frozen lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2)#37322384) |
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:49 PM Author: aquamarine razzmatazz casino (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2)#49084769) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:52 PM Author: flushed elite reading party i’ve seen *former* lawyers who did this, but never any that were able to remain barred. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2)#49084782) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:56 PM Author: vibrant black tanning salon You mean alphabetical (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2)#49084803) |
 |
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:57 PM Author: flushed elite reading party ljl. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2)#49084806) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 11:02 PM Author: trip rigpig i was adjacent to a situation where a low level associate was sending out an email to the client, two partners, and two other non-partners.
the associate got reamed, in a screaming way, by the senior partner for not listing the client first in the "to" line, then the partners by seniority in the "to" line, and then the non-partners by seniority in the "cc" line. |