The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
woman kneeling before a pretty penis in Hobbesian state of nature
| .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,.....,:,...:.:.,:.::,. | 07/21/25 |
| male emotional laborer | 07/21/25 |
| Kenneth Play | 07/21/25 |
| we have such sights to show you | 07/21/25 |
| eucalyptus bubble bear | 07/21/25 |
| msj | 07/21/25 |
| eucalyptus bubble bear | 07/22/25 |
| "im pumo now" | 07/22/25 |
| ,.,....,.,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,..,,:,.,.:..,:.::,. | 07/22/25 |
| "im pumo now" | 07/22/25 |
| ,.,....,.,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,..,,:,.,.:..,:.::,. | 07/22/25 |
| "im pumo now" | 07/22/25 |
| "im pumo now" | 07/22/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 21st, 2025 9:22 PM Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,.....,:,...:.:.,:.::,. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120168) |
Date: July 21st, 2025 9:23 PM Author: male emotional laborer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120169) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 9:24 PM Author: Kenneth Play unggh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120170) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 9:37 PM Author: we have such sights to show you tp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120212) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:26 PM Author: eucalyptus bubble bear (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120457) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 9:51 PM Author: msj it kind of makes me think that birdbrain has no clue whatsoever what “hobbesian state of nature” even means. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120236) |
|
Date: July 22nd, 2025 1:35 AM Author: eucalyptus bubble bear First time I heard that there was some guy in Euro history who had the name Hobbes before Calvin and Hobbes ever existed, it threw my high school brain for a loop (my “intellect” without the guidance of insightful men on Autoadmit.com isn’t much to write home about, evidently - and I really like it here FWIW) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120571) |
|
Date: July 22nd, 2025 3:59 AM Author: "im pumo now" yeah i'm sure that it's actually a "pretty penis" and that isn't just more slander concocted by greedy, panicking jews and feds in their vain efforts to do damage control you can fit (i.e. rape) a lot of Suffering and Falsity inside of a vessel too exhausted by the onslaught of evil in this world to fight back 24/7 do you ever notice how these people reduce the noumena underpinning everything freely given between people to mere "costs" and a system of tabulation-friendly exchange? i wonder why that is. surely it's not to dump layers of fundamentally fake arbitrage into sets of relations that they're trying to gain control over |
|
Date: July 22nd, 2025 4:15 AM Author: ,.,....,.,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,..,,:,.,.:..,:.::,. "pretty penis"
cr. anglo-judeo rational calculativism vs. continental transcendentalism. |
|
Date: July 22nd, 2025 4:27 AM Author: "im pumo now" they just don't understand it and have to rape something that can only exist with gentleness and "chesed" into one of their pre-rendered categorizations for the sakes of control over phenomenon that are genuinely new and extant productions of the system of living built around us and personal disputes, or perceived personal disputes, are what animates the original blow against anyway. there's few real "costs" involved; and the intended results are "court-ordered diabetes", a sickness unto death. and if it's hard enough and from behind there's not going to be any counter-argumentation, and that's counted on, because there are no real lasting arguments against. it's from a playbook. |
|
Date: July 22nd, 2025 4:36 AM Author: ,.,....,.,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,..,,:,.,.:..,:.::,. Hitler was right. a 'civilized' rebarbarization of man is the only way forward.
modernity (technological thought) is anti-metaphysical. it venerates only the primacy of instrumental reason and calculation/categorization, rejecting the meaning and validity of any other position, for which it must offer itself as replacement. |
|
Date: July 22nd, 2025 4:58 AM Author: "im pumo now" i kinda disagree with this. i'm optimistic about technology, machine-operated farms are great, robotic surgical assistance is awesome, even if i think something like LLMs should've never existed to begin with. the cat's out of the bag now though, the chinese are working on the same stuff, the world economy is globalized, and people will probably be subjected to it one way or another unless it's all just a mass hallucination. the easiest (said with some irony; there's nothing "easy" about even the easiest way out of this mess) and most obvious route is just using this withered state to nationalize large parts of the profit faucets from these devices and putting them into a general pension fund to cover the costs incurred (publicly) by the (private) destruction of professional life. have it pay for those laid off or found without means, for a time, and use the surpluses to build and improve communities and ensure that people have access to self-sustaining labor that improves the qualities of their lives. if "sam altman" or "mark zuckerberg" or whoever whines about it they're shoved up against a wall and given their exit package in lead. i don't have any patience left for these Silicon Valley cognoscenti types after seeing how little care they have for the citizenry that their wealth is supposed to benefit and protect, as per the liberal social contract wrt private-public partnership in the state. imo the neoliberal elite has been deliberately weakening the state over the last several decades to stave off this sort of outcome, though. same with the "UN" or any other international regulatory body that could put out a SALT like treaty limiting production and usage of these things. what we're looking at is the utter failure of the "free market" and the classically liberal economic consensus on the matter of protecting the citizenry from the rapaciousness and greed of the billionaire caste, and public opinion needs to change accordingly. if there's some "rebarbarization" that happens in the course of this, it's acceptable. i agree some with your second paragraph, and sympathize with it i/r/t a later point in human development, but am much more moderate on it for the present time. generally i'm thinking that if the wealth shared by another round of technological revolution is disbursed fairly amongst those displaced by it, we could be able to save the general structure of things. make every lawful citizen a shareholder in the threshing mill and the cotton gin and new economic sectors will eventually open up for those displaced by those narrowing. imo technology is not frightening in and of itself; what frightens us is the prospect of the power-relations that morally degraded Capital will inevitably subject us to, using it as a vessel for dominance. every hour i save with a washing machine is an hour i can use to read poetry, or work on my patio, or talk to my friends. the washing machine wasn't an existential threat for anyone other than dish soap producers, though. LLMs are a general threat to the public and their way of life, and seem to empowering a handful of the shittiest and least "noblesse oblige" bound elites in recent history. |
|
Date: July 22nd, 2025 5:15 AM Author: "im pumo now" liberating the working class from the conditions that make them the working class was the original promise of modernity's technological thrust, and this was something taken for granted and shared by men as a fairly common sentiment up until some point in the late aughts or tens, where a great expansion of the values of the Market came to introduce all of these evils once thought vanquished from the lens of valorization back into the popular mind (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753136&forum_id=2)#49120696) |