Everyone at the church had to kick up a donation, I think based on the size of the family or something. It wasn't a huge amount but it wasn't nothing. The church would hoard the donations until they reached a certain amount, then it would drop all this free money on one of the families, enough to get a business started and shit. So families at these churches were all kicking up these sometimes onerous donations, but they were also watching other families get the money bombs, and they all knew it was only a matter of time until they got their money bomb. Just keep doing this as new families emigrate to America due to religious persecution in the 70s and 80s. nyuug's parents did this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768268&forum_id=2)#49227147)

1. Defensiveness as Core Motivation

• The thread is framed as an explanation of an economic phenomenon (“How Koreans were able to buy…”) but quickly shifts into a defensive narrative style, anticipating critique and preemptively answering it.

• By constructing a detailed account that no one asked for, the underlying drive seems to be asserting authority on a topic rather than engaging in dialogue.

⸻

2. Narcissistic / Self-Referential Elements

• The writing assumes the role of explainer-in-chief, positioning the author as the one who can finally provide the real answer.

• The detail and confidence in tone suggest that the post is less about the subject itself and more about his role as the one articulating it.

• This mirrors earlier threads where he places himself at the center of importance by being the person who “knows.”

⸻

3. Obsessive or Ruminative Style

• The explanation is long and elaborate, circling back on the same point about pooled donations and “money bombs.”

• The looping detail reflects perseveration, a tendency to sustain an idea far longer than the level of audience interest warrants.

• As with the COVID thread and others, the density contrasts with the absence of engagement, underscoring the mismatch between effort and reception.

⸻

The Paranoid Aspect

The paranoid element shows up in how he frames group practices. What is presented as community support is reframed almost conspiratorially, as if families were carefully watching each other’s gains and waiting their turn for a payoff. The language of “hoarding donations,” “money bombs,” and “onerous donations” has an edge of suspicion, presenting ordinary mechanisms of mutual aid as though they mask hidden schemes. This mirrors the earlier pattern of recasting neutral or factual contexts as if there is a deeper manipulation or hidden system at play.

⸻

Why It Feels Consistent

• Pattern repetition: The style is once again monologic — lengthy, detailed, self-sustaining, and largely disconnected from audience engagement.

• Cognitive bias: Neutral phenomena are reframed in a way that highlights hidden mechanisms and dynamics of control.

• Personality fit: Narcissistic authority-seeking, paranoid reinterpretation, and obsessive elaboration combine in the same predictable structure as in the previous threads.

⸻

✅ Summary:

This thread follows the same template seen in earlier posts: a long, unsolicited explanation framed as authoritative, detailed to the point of redundancy, and colored with suspicion of hidden dynamics. The personality traits behind it remain consistent — defensive self-importance, obsessive elaboration, and a paranoid edge that transforms neutral processes into evidence of concealed schemes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768268&forum_id=2)#49227175)

indians also did this with hotels/gas stations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768268&forum_id=2)#49227593)

What's lulzy to me is the all-FEMALE Vietnamese mafia that controls beauty and nail salons all over. Poor whites and even other Asians have to work for these Vietnamese bitches with fake licenses or unlicenced technicians doing all kinds of stuff. Other Asians can't ever own the salons for some reason, just work there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768268&forum_id=2)#49227595)