/panicked Jewish wheezing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49380566)

i'm not sure what tucker thought was gonna happen in this interview, but he managed to make fuentes look really good to his very substantial audience

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49380743)

that's kind of what Tucker is imho.

I don't think he really had a plan. He knew he was full of shit w/r/t Nick so he can't play gotcha.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49380807)

so it's pretty weird for him to "feud" with fuentes about fuentes's anti-israel/jewish influence rhetoric specifically. in this interview fuentes gives very straightforward, coherent explanations for his beliefs and rhetoric about jews, and tucker keeps sputtering nonsense (why?) in response

i think tucker just thinks he's a lot smarter than he actually is and he's unable to understand that some other people really are just way smarter and way better at rhetoric than him and he should never, ever invite those people on his show unless they are 100% friendlies

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49380835)

Is not a settled issue and I think

That Nick was smart to toss Aquinas out

Then drop the subject gracefully as possible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49384157)

at the end of the day, he is a 'Multiracial Invidualist' populist who has no real ammunition against white replacism, which is 100% consistent with his basic bitch 'I don't believe in white group interests' civnat politics.

Fuentes is just making him spell this out.

when you take away all the hype, all the edgy Daryl Cooper WW2 'revisionism', he is just an Alt Lite clown. he's a 'Proud Boy'.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49380843)

he thinks he is "optics policing" "for the cause" but in reality he's just old and out of touch and not actually very smart and doesn't fully understand what's going on

every single person who listens to this interview, regardless of their prior beliefs, will think that fuentes comes off as more intelligent, reasonable, and frankly just has a better understanding of the world than tucker

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49380866)

That's his entire shtick is the purity of the groyper movement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49381625)

I also liked where Tucker was like "I'm sorry I called you gay btw"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49381326)

-pretty clear that Fuentes's understandable resentment toward conservative media figures for shutting him out fuels his entire approach to media. he's been driven completely insane watching people show up to the antisemitism party ten years after he did and not receive half of the pushback he did. so while it seems that Tucker or Candace don't have nearly as much substantive disagreement with him that people might think they do, his knee-jerk reaction is always going to be "Fuck you" which is once again understandable.

-Fuentes is a much better rhetorician than Tucker. There might not be anyone better.

-Tucker starts out the interview apprehensive about Fuentes, but I think he starts to realize about halfway through the extent to which his resentment and his lack of guidance is responsible for his "attack first" mentality, and then I feel like Tucker softens considerably after that. I don't think Tucker or Nick disagree on almost anything. Nick is just far more juvenile in how he expresses it.

-This is a total Fuentes victory, it further humanizes him, he got to defend himself on a number of messy points to the biggest audience he's ever had, and I feel like Tucker will take him under his wing from now on.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49381698)

Tucker is a self-preservationist though. He will continue to blow in the wind. Candace is just retarded

But otherwise, cr.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49381822)

The final segment of the interview about women was absolutely devastating for him. He looked like a total clown

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49381956)

Tucker babbling about how it's important for men to be married because it's good to "live around someone who you don't fully understand" while Fuentes sat there trying to hold back laughter was wild to watch

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49381983)

CR except it NEEDS to be underscored that regardless of whether he is personally fueled by resentment or insanity or whatever, Fuentes is 100% correct about that we need to be TYRANNICAL at this point about THOROUGHLY DESTROYING any and all gatekeepers on the right re the JQ.

No, it' not "Neocons," it's all Jews. No, it's not just "Israel / the government of Israel," it's all Jews. No, it's not "Iraelis," it's all Jews. It's all Jews, everywhere, always. Period. And that cannot and will not change for as long as "the Jews" exist as a people who are separate and apart from the rest of humanity (genetically and/or culturally) in any fashion or form, anywhere on Earth. Period.

There can be absolutely no half measures or compromises on either the substance or the rhetoric of that position moving forward, and God bless Nick for seeing that and staying true to the course on it at all times, whatever his personal motivations may be.

Literally the only thing I disagree(d) with Nick about was when he disavowed that there is a clear genetic element underpinning "Jewish behavior." That's obviously the case, and Fuentes probably knows that on some level, but strategically I don't think it's necessary to dwell on that fact in 2025 so he can have a pass there (for now).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382640)

Yeah he's obviously temporarily cucking on that, I get it and that's one thing I can understand and forgive ATM. But eventually that fact, too, will need to be openly acknowledged and discussed on a normie-facing level.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382708)

Tucker explicitly acknowledged this also

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382704)

'oh, who is dave rubin? is he even relevant today?!?!'

'oh, ben shapirio?!? ha, is he even relevant today???!'

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49385739)

NF ripped him a new asshole a couple months ago.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382135)

Weed is worse than alcohol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382035)

🕎🇮🇱✡️🕍

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382283)

Haha yeah haha super embarrassing

Which of the retarded hot take low IQ bullshit talking points that Nick mindlessly regurgitated did you *most* substantively disagree with, btw? :)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382672)

Wow!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382683)

also he wears a wig and is a federal agent.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382692)

I heard he's also gay! And basically 100% Mexican! Did I mention that he's a homosexual pedophile?!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49382695)

Explained that there's no winning with support

Of politicians. "If I go for them

It's 'toxic bear-hug.' If I voice dissent

It's 'senseless in-fighting'." And that's where Tucker

Accepted his defeat, it seems to me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49384094)

https://x.com/nickjfuentes/status/1983544934721597583?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49386766)

you can tell he plays this dumb shtick he knows is pure kike enforced propaganda

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790623&forum_id=2)#49389069)