The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
What % of men 18-30 can bench 225?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:27 PM Author: Brilliant Hissy Fit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109813) |
 |
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:40 PM Author: Histrionic filthy jap range Fewer than 1 in 10 for sure. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109984) |
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:28 PM Author: Irradiated Affirmative Action Around 25% brother. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109818) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:28 PM Author: Stirring tanning salon Lulz (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109826) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:31 PM Author: razzmatazz son of senegal gaping lololol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109867) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:28 PM Author: Ultramarine macaca 2-3%, and that is generous. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109824) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:28 PM Author: Amber School Cafeteria Jewess 225 has got to be in the 90 percentile (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109825) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:28 PM Author: appetizing tantric field rigor 3-5% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109830) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:29 PM Author: Brilliant Hissy Fit what % of LS bros can bench 225? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109835) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:29 PM Author: Amber School Cafeteria Jewess are we talking for reps or max? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109846) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:30 PM Author: Brilliant Hissy Fit at least once (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109856) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:31 PM Author: Amber School Cafeteria Jewess i'd say 20 percent
a max lift is a poor indicator of strength, imo |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:38 PM Author: cobalt mad-dog skullcap a max lift has a lot more to do with your mastery of the form of that lift than the number of reps you can do with say, 80% of your max. i'd agree with that. i don't see how you figure 20% of law school dudes can do 225 once. i'd say your average law school dude could put up around 160 for 1 rep if that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109960) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2012 7:20 PM Author: Honey-headed Adulterous Skinny Woman Home Average LS dude hasn't seen the inside of a gym in years. 135 for a few reps, and that's being generous. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20140541) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:39 PM Author: Ultramarine macaca I'll have to disagree.
A max lift is the best indicator of absolute strength. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:29 PM Author: Racy bearded theatre i can bench 185, I weigh 185. What do i do to get 225? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109840) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:30 PM Author: Passionate indian lodge you can bench 185... once? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109849) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:30 PM Author: appetizing tantric field rigor Actually start working out. You should be able to bench your own body weight just by being a non fatass who gets a bit of physical activity and has played sports in the past. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109853) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:30 PM Author: Amber School Cafeteria Jewess not for reps, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109861) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:49 PM Author: Racy bearded theatre bro ive been working out for like 4 months now. I cant get more than this, what should i do? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110040) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:31 PM Author: razzmatazz son of senegal gaping 2-5%. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109872) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:35 PM Author: cobalt mad-dog skullcap yeah, less than 5% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20109915) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:46 PM Author: electric hairless pit legend bench is for shorts with their short stubby little arms. dead lift is tc lift. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110021) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:47 PM Author: Hairraiser reading party just do both pansy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110026) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:48 PM Author: Histrionic filthy jap range Dead lift is about 1000x more credited than bench press. However, being short and stubby is no less mechanically advantageous for the DL than it is for the BP. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110039) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 10:56 PM Author: cobalt mad-dog skullcap having short arms sucks for the deadlift. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110090) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:05 PM Author: Histrionic filthy jap range This is true, but having short legs helps. I guess to the extent a person is proportionately stubby, there is actually an advantage on the BP over the DL. I stand corrected. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110142) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:10 PM Author: learning disabled free-loading chapel stock car (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110184) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:03 PM Author: Passionate indian lodge to an extent. the raw bench press record is still held by scott mendelson, who is 5'11". (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110130) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:04 PM Author: Aromatic Harsh Heaven Legal Warrant but he's a topheavy ripped 350lbs... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110136) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:16 PM Author: Passionate indian lodge it seems like the additional weight reaches a point of very sharply diminishing returns.
eg, the all-time record at any weight is mendelson's 715lbs. truly remarkable. but as you note, he was 350 when he did that.
now if we cut that weight almost in half - down to 181 - the bench record for that weight level is NOT cut in half. in fact, it's hanging out at 556lbs. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:22 PM Author: Rambunctious Bawdyhouse Background Story Ryan Kenelley benched 1075. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110275) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:23 PM Author: Passionate indian lodge i don't even consider the bench-shirt records. go raw or nothing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110282) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:29 PM Author: Rambunctious Bawdyhouse Background Story A shirt can't do much. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110313) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:32 PM Author: Passionate indian lodge it gave scott mendelson a 315lb boost. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110332) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:34 PM Author: frum philosopher-king It can do 360 pounds extra, apparently (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110350) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:32 PM Author: Ultramarine macaca Bodyweight and the return on bar weight is not linear. Every strength coefficient formula takes this into account. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110326) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:34 PM Author: Ultramarine macaca Squat is still the overall most credited indicator of total body strength, regardless of limb length.
|
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:12 PM Author: walnut exciting library 2% can 4 plate.
and I think a combined DL/BP is a good indicator of power and strength. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:26 PM Author: Purple people who are hurt indirect expression 30-40% of non-faggots who actually hit the gym. 225 is a completely unimpressive lift. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110294) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:29 PM Author: Chest-beating halford spot who cares about bench press? i'm a crossfit bro. we dont do that shit lift (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110308) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:35 PM Author: frum philosopher-king do you do crossfit in vibram five fingers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110369) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:32 PM Author: mauve box office athletic conference very few. the 2-5% figure is probably right (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110327) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 11:46 PM Author: Purple people who are hurt indirect expression lmao @ the manlets on this site (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#20110481) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2026 11:15 PM Author: nyuug When looking at the entire world population, the percentage of humans who can bench press 225 lbs (102.1 kg) at any given moment is exceptionally small—estimated to be well under 0.5%, and likely closer to 0.05% to 0.1%.
While hitting a "two-plate" bench press is a common milestone in fitness circles, expanding the data pool to include every human on Earth completely shifts the statistics. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2026 11:16 PM Author: nyuug When we narrow the lens down to 18–35-year-old males globally, we are looking at humanity’s absolute peak demographic for physical strength. Because of this, the number does jump noticeably compared to the general population, but it remains surprisingly low.
Globally, it is estimated that only 1% to 2% of males aged 18–35 can bench press 225 lbs. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2026 11:43 PM Author: Highfalutin Halfbreed 100% of men 18-50 should be able to put up at least a couple reps of 225, or they're not men at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888889&forum_id=2)#49975104) |