SCOTUS: white men need not meet higher standard to sue for discrimination
| white toaster | 06/05/25 | | Marvelous ruby dopamine | 06/05/25 | | Godawful Son Of Senegal | 06/05/25 | | copper lay | 06/05/25 | | white toaster | 06/17/25 | | magenta gaping | 06/17/25 | | white toaster | 06/17/25 | | Zippy Cobalt Windowlicker | 06/17/25 | | white toaster | 06/17/25 | | Zippy Cobalt Windowlicker | 06/17/25 | | Odious home hominid | 06/17/25 | | white toaster | 06/17/25 | | Maize generalized bond | 06/17/25 | | Odious home hominid | 06/17/25 | | white toaster | 06/17/25 | | Odious home hominid | 06/17/25 | | white toaster | 06/17/25 | | Zippy Cobalt Windowlicker | 06/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 17th, 2025 9:00 PM Author: white toaster
are you just playing dumb or what? the EEOC is political like every agency. the administration in power decides what gets prioritized. under Biden it was groups like trannies. Trump has explicitly told the EEOC to ignore the tranny shit and instead now pursue "reverse discrimination" cases -- which, as you unwittingly highlight, is really just discrimination. But libs didnt see it that way. They saw punishing white men as enforcing "equity" and "social justice".
so, last week, there were a bunch of prominent Biden investigations that got suddently dropped, like this one: https://whyy.org/articles/sheetz-racial-discrimination-case-eeoc-trump-executive-order/
now, they're shifting their resources to reverse discrimination cases. you heard it here first.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733697&forum_id=2)#49026449) |
|
|