If ocean is more nutrient-rich than land then why we live on land?
| VoteRepublican | 07/21/25 | | Schizomemesis is gay | 07/21/25 | | 40-50x more gay and autistic than you | 07/21/25 | | VoteRepublican | 07/21/25 | | msj | 07/21/25 | | hank_scorpio | 07/21/25 | | msj | 07/21/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/21/25 | | 40-50x more gay and autistic than you | 07/21/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/21/25 | | VoteRepublican | 07/21/25 | | VoteRepublican | 07/21/25 | | Jack Mehoff | 07/21/25 | | hank_scorpio | 07/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 21st, 2025 8:05 PM Author: 40-50x more gay and autistic than you
Despite the ocean being more nutrient-rich than land in terms of dissolved minerals and biological productivity in certain zones, humans live on land primarily because it provides a more suitable and stable environment for our survival and development. Our biology is adapted to breathe air, walk on solid ground, and regulate body temperature in terrestrial conditions. While oceans contain vast amounts of nutrients that support massive populations of marine life, they do not offer the physical infrastructure we need—such as dry, stable surfaces for building homes, growing crops, and developing technology.
Additionally, human civilization has been shaped by access to fresh water, predictable weather, and fertile soil—all of which are more readily available and manageable on land. The ocean's harsh conditions, including saltwater, pressure changes, limited oxygen, and constant movement, make it a challenging habitat for long-term human habitation. Although underwater exploration and technology have advanced significantly, living permanently in the ocean would require complex life-support systems and enormous energy inputs. Therefore, even with the ocean’s nutrient richness, the practical needs of human life are far better met on land.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2)#49119978) |
|
|