https://solarireport.substack.com/p/dillon-read-and-co-inc-and-the-aristocracy

fitts was a high up executive in dillon read, a powerful and very well connected investment bank. she goes into great detail about the criminal nature of wall street, and she correctly notes offhandedly that the rothschild central bank scam rules the world.

given you have discounted my analysis because you claim to be an insider with greater knowledge about the process than i do as an outsider, i'm interested in your analysis of the above, thank

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905273)

"evidence that a very large proportion of the nation's wealth is being illegally diverted since several decades into secret, unaccountable channels and programmes with unspecified purposes, including covert operations and subversions abroad and clandestine military R&D at home. Public institutions have been infiltrated and taken over by shadowy groups in the service of powerful private and vested interests, often at the expense of the common good."

i believe this. that doesn't mean that there is a central bank cabal of puppet masters, it means that grifters gonna grift. i don't think many people here disagree that the government is rife with grift and pork. the difference is that we don't think it's orchestrated by a cabal. the powerful have always been tempted to use their power for selfish reasons. that doesn't mean there is a centralized conspiracy to do so.

also, i never said because *I* have superior knowledge you should change your mind. i said the *COLLECTIVE* superior knowledge of xo should influence you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905483)

and since you rely on her so much, why not take to heart her explicit renunciation of your blackpill despair bullshit?

"My hope is that as your powers grow to see the financial game and the true dividing lines, you will be better able to build networks of authentic people inventing authentic solutions to the real challenges we face. My hope is that you will no longer invite into your lives and work the people and organizations that sabotage real change. If enough of us come clean and hold true to the intention to transform the game, we invite in the magic that comes in dangerous times. Yes, there is a better way, and yes, we can create it."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905517)

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&mc=10&forum_id=2#48905537

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905542)

this article is contrary to your conspiracy theory moron. i intend to read it throughly. in mean time, care to address her saying her purpose in explaining how the grift works is to promote changes in the system and how that fits in with your blackpill despair?

i don't think you will because your level of engagement shows you either havent read the article or are too dense to understand that it is completely contrary to your theories.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905561)

if you need more "on the nose" comments from fitts about the rothschilds and the central bank scam, see here:

https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-invisible-corral-how-central

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905596)

(2) while i believe this world is fallen and cannot be perfected, and i believe fitts is too optimistic, i support her in her individuation process because she means well and she's doing the right thing by letting the public know.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905638)

if this article supports your theory then it's explicit purpose could not be grass roots change.

the article doesn't support your theory, it documents the mechanism by which elites grift from the system. note that you cannot find a passage that says "btw it's a central bank cabal running things." and now you're doing consuela sophistry to referencing jungian individuation and accusing me of changing the topic to avoid directly answering a simple question.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905652)

next question?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905659)

"very large proportion," "secret," "unaccountable," "unspecified," "covert," "clandestine," "shadowy," "private"

every single thing asserted in this paragraph is deliberately unfalsifiable hand-waving. it's like someone wrote this paragraph to mock "conspiracy theorist" types in bad faith

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905497)

Just read the article in op itself.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905501)

"Given the central banking-warfare investment model that rules our planet, it was appropriate that Dillon partners at various times lead both the Treasury Department and the Defense Department."

"While in Europe he became friends with Edward Stinnes, who recruited him after a short career with Booz Allen in Chicago to work in New York for the Rothschild family, considered to be one of if not the wealthiest family in the world."

"One of my favorite Dillon Read officers was the son of a former Dillon chairman and, thus, remarkably wise about the ways of the firm. I sought him out after a Birkelund temper tantrum and said that Birkelund was not at all like a “Brady Man” and that I was surprised at Nick’s choice. My colleague looked at me with surprise and said something to the effect of “Brady did not choose Birkelund. Birkelund is a ‘Rothschild Man’.” I then said something about Dillon being owned by the Dillon partners, so what did the Rothschild’s have to do with us? My colleague rolled his eyes and walked away as if I was an interloper out of my league among the moneyed classes — clueless as to who and what was really in charge at Dillon Read and in the world."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905537)

"Given the central banking-warfare investment model that rules our planet, it was appropriate that Dillon partners at various times lead both the Treasury Department and the Defense Department."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905540)

it is delivered apropos of nothing, as a complete non sequitur, with no context or argumentation or rationale to back it up. it is simply stated as fact, out of nowhere, lol

i feel like i've seen this pattern before. can't imagine where though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905552)

also, you're calling other people stupid this entire time in response to their suggestions that the first essay doesn't support your claim at all

great stuff man thanks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905626)

when you state "it is delivered apropos of nothing, as a complete non sequitur, with no context or argumentation or rationale to back it up. it is simply stated as fact, out of nowhere, lol", i gave you another link that delved deeper into her assertions.

hope you enjoyed the step by step explanation of food regurgitation, chicklet!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905635)

it seems that he just saw that there was a section that included "rothschild" and ran to present it as QED that a high-level insider agrees with him. but it does exactly the opposite.

i am enjoying consuela's sophistry in explaining how citing an article that proves him wrong actually proves him right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905636)

the "rothschild central banks control everything" theory is in the same category as the moon landings were fake. i actually used to believe both of these fwiw when i was like 22 years old. but they crumble pretty quickly under real scrutiny

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905649)

conspiracy theorists like consuela are searching for order in a world that is nuanced, chaotic, and unfair. that is why he is so emotionally invested in his beliefs. if it turns out that there isn't some nefarious puppet master controlling things, that means he was just weak by giving up compared to people that didn't. instead, he's convinced himself that giving up was smart, and the only reason we experience joy and hope is because we are naive sheeple.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5720657&forum_id=2).#48905663)