XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| flirting toaster | 07/04/25 | | Wine 180 legal warrant | 07/04/25 | | Dead bronze persian business firm | 07/04/25 | | Glittery Painfully Honest Plaza | 07/04/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/04/25 | | magenta mood | 07/04/25 | | Wine 180 legal warrant | 07/04/25 | | magenta mood | 07/04/25 | | Wine 180 legal warrant | 07/04/25 | | magenta mood | 07/04/25 | | Wine 180 legal warrant | 07/05/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/05/25 | | Anal iridescent abode | 07/05/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/06/25 | | Anal iridescent abode | 07/05/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/05/25 | | Anal iridescent abode | 07/06/25 | | Impertinent Ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | Nubile burgundy mexican piazza | 07/05/25 | | heady house | 07/06/25 | | Nubile burgundy mexican piazza | 07/06/25 | | magenta mood | 07/06/25 | | Nubile burgundy mexican piazza | 07/06/25 | | magenta mood | 07/06/25 | | Yapping Soul-stirring Nursing Home | 07/05/25 | | Comical judgmental principal's office jap | 07/06/25 | | black queen of the night indian lodge | 07/05/25 | | Slate twinkling uncleanness | 07/06/25 | | magenta mood | 07/06/25 | | Electric mischievous locale roommate | 07/06/25 | | magenta mood | 07/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle garrison laser beams | 07/06/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/06/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/06/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/06/25 | | Impertinent Ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/06/25 | | heady house | 07/06/25 | | flirting toaster | 07/06/25 | | Electric mischievous locale roommate | 07/06/25 | | Comical judgmental principal's office jap | 07/06/25 | | magenta mood | 07/06/25 | | Fighting mad-dog skullcap base | 07/06/25 | | nofapping national volcanic crater | 07/06/25 | | ivory aromatic area tank | 07/06/25 | | nofapping national volcanic crater | 07/06/25 | | dark mediation people who are hurt | 07/06/25 | | Nubile burgundy mexican piazza | 07/06/25 | | marvelous violent azn | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: magenta mood
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: magenta mood
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: magenta mood
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: magenta mood
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Slate twinkling uncleanness
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Impertinent Ladyboy
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Comical judgmental principal's office jap
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49076800) |
|
|