The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Humphrey’s Executor joining Barbaro and Roe v. Wade in hell
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:08 PM Author: Supple lime step-uncle's house pervert big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule HE without mentioning it and just pull the plug?"
https://x.com/WilliamBaude/status/1925671526390444089 |
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:42 PM Author: Supple lime step-uncle's house pervert [taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.]
is this still a law bort? c'mon, man, Humphrey's Executor just bit the dust. |
|
Date: December 8th, 2025 11:04 PM Author: Supple lime step-uncle's house pervert (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49495612) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 5:58 AM Author: Hairraiser useless brakes Next up, 13th Amendment! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49495893) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 8:41 AM Author: Arousing burgundy stag film quadroon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49496020) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: Supple lime step-uncle's house pervert Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are told.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1998123030917341316 |
 |
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:52 AM Author: rebellious maniacal piazza round eye the cons have the right position on this, but i think this is going to wind up being a chaotic disaster. practically speaking, these phd dorks are the experts to whom (in many cases) we should probably defer, although i think the solution for that is going to be to gut federal agencies and minimize the power they have. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49496287) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:55 AM Author: rebellious maniacal piazza round eye also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think jackson was saying the president should have NO power to fire agency heads, just that the "for cause" removal protections should be upheld.
the answer to the question she poses, though, is obviously that if the president is putting people in positions who know nothing, that's the senate's job to prevent that (which they clearly haven't done if you look at trump's nominees but that's a different issue altogether). |
|
Date: June 29th, 2026 10:38 AM Author: Supple lime step-uncle's house pervert https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2071599665666035776
Humphrey's is gone! |
|
Date: June 29th, 2026 10:58 AM Author: crusty zippy stead sbarro wrote the dissent. here we go...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-332_qn12.pdf |
|
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:00 AM Author: crusty zippy stead rofl she cites NO KINGS
In holding otherwise, the Court gives the President a power unknown even to the English Crown against which the Founders revolted, elevating him above his oncecoequal branches by transforming a duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed into a license to act in defiance of those very laws. If nothing else, the doctrine of stare decisis, which today’s decision cursorily dismisses, should have made this a profoundly easy case under Humphrey’s |
|
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:03 AM Author: Big internet-worthy church building somebody should've made soto sit down and diagram that first sentence before she was allowed to put it in the opinion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49968921) |
|
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:05 AM Author: crusty zippy stead (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2).#49968923) |
|
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:01 AM Author: crusty zippy stead i love rehnquist now!
Today’s majority, however, decides that it knows better: better than members of the founding generation who created agencies, like the Sinking Fund Commission and the Bank of the United States, free from unfettered Presidential control; better than a century and a half of Congresses and Presidents, starting with Grover Cleveland and continuing into the 21st century, who created agencies in the FTC’s mold; better than even Hamilton, Story, Webster, Holmes, Brandeis, Frankfurter, and Rehnquist.
These great statesmen and Justices knew something that today’s majority apparently does not: that fealty to the Constitution means |
|
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:03 AM Author: crusty zippy stead Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of one that distorts the structure of Government to fit the majority’s theory of unitary, total executive control. The result is a President who emerges with far greater power than ever before. It is a power, however, that neither the People, nor Congress, nor the Constitution bestowed upon him. In granting the President this unbridled authority, the Court upends its precedent, misconstrues our history, and sheds any pretense of judicial modesty. I respectfully dissent. |