Gemini has gotten better at shitlaw
| Geriatric Affirmative Action Foreskin | 07/08/25 | | Flatulent ivory property | 07/08/25 | | Concupiscible dark space | 07/08/25 | | Flatulent ivory property | 07/08/25 | | puce hairy legs location | 07/08/25 | | Flatulent ivory property | 07/08/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/08/25 | | Geriatric Affirmative Action Foreskin | 07/08/25 | | Flatulent ivory property | 07/08/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 | | Concupiscible dark space | 07/08/25 | | arrogant mediation lettuce | 07/09/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 | | arrogant mediation lettuce | 07/09/25 | | Transparent Milk | 07/09/25 | | Flatulent ivory property | 07/09/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 | | histrionic spot | 07/09/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 | | histrionic spot | 07/09/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 | | Bistre Messiness | 07/09/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 | | arrogant mediation lettuce | 07/09/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 | | Flatulent ivory property | 07/09/25 | | haunting mint orchestra pit | 07/09/25 | | Pungent Mewling Nowag | 07/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 8th, 2025 7:38 PM Author: Geriatric Affirmative Action Foreskin
I painstakingly had gpt and Claude separately review a hostile client situation and draft a proposed email. Claude was more breezy and casual and GPT was robotically professional.
Had Gemini Pro 2.5 look at both drafts and pick one, it said they're both shitty and absolutely DO NOT SEND EITHER. Gave me a huge list of bulleted feedback and cited actual bar ethics / rules. I told it to just write the damn thing itself from scratch
Then I showed the Gemini draft to Claude and GPT and both were like "oh yeah that's way better than mine"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747770&forum_id=2).#49083885) |
|
|