you present perceptual rerouting experiments as if they're novel, which is not true. they've been experimentally verified since the mid 20th century (possibly earlier; i don't remember when the first vision alteration experiments were performed). red flag #2.

you list off a bunch of AI tools/methods, but they all have the same underlying set of limited computational tools that are in principle unable to recreate the underlying mechanisms of thought (because these mechanisms are unknown and will likely forever remain unknown due to them being outside the scope of human intellectual capacity). okay, i'm starting to smell something. what's that smell? hmm...

let's skip over the largely irrelevant optimization part and come to the end: "LLMs assisting with code development." LJL. you know what i smell? a liberal arts major who hasn't worked on a serious software development project and would likely fail out of a pre-calculus class.

admit it, your liberal arts degree turned you into an ignorant fool who fell for the AI hype.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734550&forum_id=2).#48994965)

where did i present the perceptual rerouting experiments as if they are novel? i didn't imply that. i simply think they are a decisive piece of evidence. perhaps you should work on your reading comprehension skills.

" but they all have the same underlying set of limited computational tools that are in principle unable to recreate the underlying mechanisms of thought" This assertion is completely baseless and it is the sort of thing that someone would only assert if they were emotionally invested in the idea that humans are special, when there is now substantial empirical evidence that they aren't.

dipshits like you are about to succeeded by layers of matrix multiplications. you should probably try to make peace with that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734550&forum_id=2).#48995012)

> "cortical uniformity isn't really debatable in a significant way"

literally a simple google search will show you research results from "prestigious" research scientists saying that cortical uniformity has been shown to be false.

>"where did i present the perceptual rerouting experiments as if they are novel?"

you imply this by referencing experiments that can narrow this down to the cortex, which is novel. but the general idea was shown to be true before you were born.

>"This assertion is completely baseless and it is the sort of thing that someone would only assert if they were emotionally invested in the idea that humans are special, when there is now substantial empirical evidence that they aren't."

If you think about it for a moment, you'll see that I'm stating an uncontroversial fact about intellectual capacities of all organisms: they're necessarily limited in scope if you paid attention in high school biology. In no way do I even hint that humans are special; if I were verbose, I would've said the same principles would apply to all organisms and not just humans, but again, that's being verbose.

>"dipshits like you are about to succeeded by layers of matrix multiplications. you should probably try to make peace with that."

Tell me about a time you delivered a new feature in a complex software system built over decades and used by hundreds of thousands of people daily. Oh wait, I see that POLITICAL SCIENCE DIPLOMA ON YOUR WALL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734550&forum_id=2).#48995086)

Like I'd say short NVIDIA but there's actually still going to be substantial demand going forward because even if AI progress continues to stall, they still have to build out compute in order to service user demand

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734550&forum_id=2).#48994375)

At this point the whole American economy is dependent on them going up forever and I don't think they'll ever be allowed to correct to reality

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734550&forum_id=2).#48994428)

If you have more than like $10k in cash you're kind of Shorting equities anyway atm and earning Interest.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734550&forum_id=2).#48994488)