...	Arrogant sepia gaping	07/01/25
trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is r...	Gold judgmental location selfie	07/01/25
Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. ...	Arrogant sepia gaping	07/01/25
James Bond surfing in die another day	Razzle unhinged brunch	07/01/25
Not even as bad as you’d think	Arrogant sepia gaping	07/01/25

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:13 AM Author: Arrogant sepia gaping (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2).#49062617)

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:37 AM Author: Gold judgmental location selfie trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is ruinous. This is why practical effects are necessary. While the FX from 80s monster movies have definitely aged they are at least still watchable and appreciable for the craft that went into them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2).#49062648)

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:28 AM Author: Arrogant sepia gaping Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. Good CGI isn’t even that expensive. Westerners just suck at making things efficiently. District 9 looked impressive iirc and it had a lowish budget iirc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2).#49063141)

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:44 AM Author: Razzle unhinged brunch James Bond surfing in die another day (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2).#49062660)

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: Arrogant sepia gaping Not even as bad as you’d think (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2).#49063133)