The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
should Hadrian have followed through with Parthia?
| garnet roast beef locale | 05/31/25 |
| translucent church building | 05/31/25 |
| Deep trip senate cuck | 05/31/25 |
| Flirting rigor | 05/31/25 |
| misanthropic learning disabled point | 05/31/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 31st, 2025 10:11 PM Author: garnet roast beef locale (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2).#48977918) |
Date: May 31st, 2025 10:15 PM Author: translucent church building he had peace, which is all the Romans could hope for there
|
|
Date: May 31st, 2025 11:43 PM Author: Deep trip senate cuck It would have been extremely difficult for him to control. The best case scenario would have been something like the Seleucids, Westerners who controlled most of modern day Iran for 150+ years after inheriting it from Alexander the Great. But they only had their eastern possessions yo worry about. Hadrian had to keep the barbarians along the German, British and Saharan frontiers in line, on top of ruling all the Western provinces and keeping a constant eye out for any generals who tried to become Emperor. It would have been very tough, and Hadrian realized that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2).#48978015) |
|
Date: May 31st, 2025 11:49 PM Author: Flirting rigor Better question is what would have happened if Caesar had lived to do his Parthian expedition. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2).#48978022) |
|
Date: May 31st, 2025 11:51 PM Author: misanthropic learning disabled point not a mfe but how would having followed through have made a big difference in Roman history? they were already pretty clearly overexpanded and couldn't manage the outer regions from the core (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2).#48978028) |