Cons what the fuck is "absolute immunity?" Is that a legal concept?
| Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | magenta set toaster | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | magenta set toaster | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | Puce heaven | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | Puce heaven | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | Adulterous chestnut double fault temple | 01/08/26 | | concupiscible dragon trust fund | 01/08/26 | | Very Tactful Athletic Conference Hall | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | flickering ocher black woman | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | flickering ocher black woman | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | flickering ocher black woman | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | flickering ocher black woman | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | flickering ocher black woman | 01/08/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/08/26 | | flickering ocher black woman | 01/09/26 | | Tan dog poop school | 01/09/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 8th, 2026 8:33 PM Author: flickering ocher black woman
i'm not sure you and i are focusing on the key issue.
absolute immunity becomes an issue when someone arguably fucks up. it doesn't become an issue when someone follows policy.
so if a judge makes a massively erroneous ruling but wasn't bribed, etc., then it was within the scope of the job but was outside policy -- and the judge gets absolute immunity.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2).#49573986) |
|
|