Bands like "Beach House" who release albums every 5yrs. WTF do they do all day?
| Narrow-minded fanboi | 12/03/24 | | Cerebral whorehouse doctorate | 12/03/24 | | Narrow-minded fanboi | 12/03/24 | | sticky candlestick maker | 12/03/24 | | swashbuckling french chef ape | 12/03/24 | | Narrow-minded fanboi | 12/03/24 | | stimulating private investor | 12/03/24 | | Narrow-minded fanboi | 12/03/24 | | pungent genital piercing | 12/03/24 | | stimulating private investor | 12/03/24 | | bronze appetizing house cuck | 12/03/24 | | stimulating private investor | 12/03/24 | | Exhilarant shrine skinny woman | 12/03/24 | | stimulating private investor | 12/03/24 | | scholarship | 09/18/26 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 09/18/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 3rd, 2024 10:57 PM Author: Exhilarant shrine skinny woman
The job is mostly touring and the overwhelming majority of fans prefer that you play familiar songs rather than new ideas that you're working out. They play like 100+ shows/year after putting out an album. That is a lot of work when you consider planning, rehearsals, travel, sound checks, and doing press. Also if you want to make money sitting at home you need a megahit that will be in movies and commercials, be streamed billions of times. You will make approximately no extra money having 10 albums in your catalog rather than 5.
I prefer when artists put out a ton of work, write on the road and test new songs, etc., but it's still a hit-driven business and people respond to the prevailing model and what the median moronic fan wants. For example see all the 90s/2000s bands who reunite and tour on playing old albums start to finish, maybe encore with a cover, an OK song from a side project, or an unreleased track that should have remained unreleased. It is hard to write great new songs and the incentives are to not bother if you've already got something the audience likes.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5643550&forum_id=2).#48408565) |
|
|